- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- UWS
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 50% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 83% | 50% | 0% | 17% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 8 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 17% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 20 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 21 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 22 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 27 | ![]() | Prestige Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 28 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 29 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 30 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 31 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
New England Mutiny
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 2 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Michigan Legends FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
SoCal FC Women
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 1.83 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Crystal Lake Force Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Montgomery Soccer Inc Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Baltimore Blast WFC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 33 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is New England Mutiny
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is Baltimore Blast WFC
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 90% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 50% | 20% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 20 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 50% | 50% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 20% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 27 | -16 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Prestige Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, New England Mutiny have been doing really well with 2.2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Michigan Legends FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Michigan Jaguars FC, whose tally of 18 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 5 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.8 points per game. Can Michigan Jaguars FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, Flint City AFC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Flint City AFC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 3 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses.
• Baltimore Blast WFC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 80% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 8 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| 16 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Prestige Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Michigan Legends FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Los Angeles Soccer Club is on the same track as Michigan Legends FC with an average of of 2.2 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Baltimore Warriors FC Women is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.25 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Racing Power Women, whose 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Montgomery Soccer Inc Women has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : Baltimore Blast WFC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 0 goals and conceded 13! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Baltimore Blast WFC play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Prestige Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Michigan Legends FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• New England Mutiny has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Michigan Legends FC.
• Baltimore Blast WFC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Baltimore Blast WFC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Montgomery Soccer Inc Women's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 1 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Montgomery Soccer Inc Women is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 15 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Prestige Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Los Angeles Soccer Club is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Los Angeles Soccer Club have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• Crystal Lake Force Women is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff

































