Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Flint City AFC
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Michigan Jaguars FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
New England Mutiny
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Rockford Raptors II Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Montgomery Soccer Inc Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
San Fernando Valley Women
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 33 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is Flint City AFC
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is San Fernando Valley Women
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, Flint City AFC have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Michigan Jaguars FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.67 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are New England Mutiny, whose tally of 14 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.33 points per game. Can New England Mutiny improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, FC Pontiac Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. FC Pontiac Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses.
• San Fernando Valley Women is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Flint City AFC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Michigan Jaguars FC is on the same track as Flint City AFC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : United City II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 3 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chicago Inter Women, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Pinnacle Women has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : San Fernando Valley Women's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 22! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching San Fernando Valley Women play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 33 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Michigan Jaguars FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 2 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• United City II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Michigan Jaguars FC.
• Lansing City Women's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Lansing City Women managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Maine Mystics Women's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Maine Mystics Women is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Flint City AFC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Flint City AFC have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• Montgomery Soccer Inc Women is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff

































