Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | United City II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 6 | 25 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 100% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 37 | -34 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 34 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
Michigan Jaguars FC
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Baltimore Blast WFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Racing Power Women
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Troy City II Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Montgomery Soccer Inc Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
San Fernando Valley Women
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 34 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is Michigan Jaguars FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is San Fernando Valley Women
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 11 | 31 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 34 | 11 | 23 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 8 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 12 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 88% |
| 6 | ![]() | United City II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 6 | 25 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 88% |
| 9 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 86% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.67 | 22% | 33% | 44% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 50% | 25% | 38% | 38% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 36 | -23 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 20 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 90% |
| 23 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 24 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 26 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 25 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 4 |
| 0.50 | 13% | 63% | 25% | 88% |
| 27 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 25 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 86% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 32 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.13 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 46 | -42 | 1 |
| 0.13 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 88% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 32 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 70% |
| 34 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 30 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 86% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, Michigan Jaguars FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Flint City AFC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Racing Power Women, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can Racing Power Women improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, Chicago Inter Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Chicago Inter Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses.
• Montgomery Soccer Inc Women is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | United City II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 30 | -27 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Michigan Jaguars FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Baltimore Blast WFC is on the same track as Michigan Jaguars FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Racing Power Women is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chicago Inter Women, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : San Fernando Valley Women has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : Montgomery Soccer Inc Women's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 2 goals and conceded 21! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Montgomery Soccer Inc Women play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 25 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Racing Power Women has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Flint City AFC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Racing Power Women.
• San Fernando Valley Women's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. San Fernando Valley Women managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Maine Mystics Women's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Maine Mystics Women is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | United City II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Midwest United FC Women is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Midwest United FC Women have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• San Fernando Valley Women is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


































