Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | - |
3 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 32 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 83% | 17% | 0% | 83% | - |
4 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
5 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
7 | ![]() | FC Buffalo Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
9 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 83% | - |
10 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
11 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
12 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 50% | - |
13 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
14 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
15 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
16 | ![]() | Elite 14 Performance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
17 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
18 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% | - |
19 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | - |
20 | ![]() | Pass FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | - |
21 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
22 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
23 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
25 | ![]() | Firebirds SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | - |
26 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
27 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
28 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC Women | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | - |
29 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
30 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
31 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
32 | ![]() | Players SC W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 23 | -16 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
33 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 21 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 67% | - |
34 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
35 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
36 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
37 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 37 | -29 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
38 | ![]() | Williamsport City Lions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
39 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% | - |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 41 | -37 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
New England Mutiny
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Santa Clarita Blue Heat
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Cincinnati Sirens FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Indiana United FC Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Worcester Smiles CIR Club
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.New York Magic
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 41 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is New England Mutiny
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is New York Magic
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 4 | 34 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 4 | 31 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 70% |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 35 | 11 | 24 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 8 | 24 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 43 | 7 | 36 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 50% | 25% | 38% | 75% |
7 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 39 | 15 | 24 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 15 | 17 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 90% |
9 | ![]() | FC Buffalo Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 36 | 20 | 16 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 90% |
11 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 13 | 30 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 29 | -3 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 71% |
17 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
18 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Pass FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% |
20 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
21 | ![]() | Elite 14 Performance | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 22% | 22% | 56% | 78% |
22 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 29 | -11 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 41 | -18 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Firebirds SC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 57% |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC Women | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 31 | -7 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
28 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 29 | -12 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 18 | 27 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 80% |
30 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 63% |
32 | ![]() | Players SC W | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 35 | -22 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 70% |
33 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 40 | -33 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
34 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 35 | -26 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
35 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 16 | 25 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
36 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 59 | -47 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 90% |
37 | ![]() | New York Magic | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 46 | -39 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 0% | 63% | 38% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 48 | -40 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 90% |
39 | ![]() | Williamsport City Lions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
41 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 47 | -44 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 70% | 30% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, New England Mutiny have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Santa Clarita Blue Heat is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.8 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Michigan Jaguars FC, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Michigan Jaguars FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, FC Buffalo Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. FC Buffalo Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses.
• Worcester Smiles CIR Club is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 19 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | FC Buffalo Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Elite 14 Performance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Pass FC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Firebirds SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
33 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | Players SC W | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
36 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Williamsport City Lions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
39 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 33 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 37 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : New England Mutiny is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Santa Clarita Blue Heat is on the same track as New England Mutiny with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Coppermine United is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Hudson Valley Crusaders, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Michigan Burn SC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : New York Magic's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 37! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching New York Magic play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 25 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
4 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
5 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Pass FC Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
11 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | FC Buffalo Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Elite 14 Performance | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
19 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
24 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
26 | ![]() | Firebirds SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | Players SC W | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
32 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
34 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
35 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Williamsport City Lions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 15 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Coppermine United has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Cincinnati Sirens FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.4 which is nearly as good as Coppermine United.
• Worcester Smiles CIR Club's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Worcester Smiles CIR Club managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. New York Magic's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, New York Magic is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | FC Buffalo Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Firebirds SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Elite 14 Performance | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
24 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
29 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Williamsport City Lions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
34 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Players SC W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
38 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
39 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Pass FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 26 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Michigan Jaguars FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Michigan Jaguars FC have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• New York Magic is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff