Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | - |
2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
3 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
4 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 13 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
6 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% | - |
7 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | - |
8 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 83% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
12 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
14 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | - |
16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
20 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
21 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
22 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 22 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
25 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
26 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
27 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
New England Mutiny
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Michigan Jaguars FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Coppermine United
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Inland Empire FC Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Baltimore Blast WFC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Indiana United FC Women
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is New England Mutiny
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is Indiana United FC Women
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 4 | 29 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 9 | 30 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 40 | 16 | 24 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 90% |
7 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 44 | 10 | 34 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 40% |
10 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 70% |
12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 75% |
13 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 20 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
15 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 20% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 24 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
17 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 39 | -18 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
21 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 27 | -16 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 35 | -27 | 3 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 89% |
23 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
24 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 45 | -41 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 90% |
25 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 40 | -35 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, New England Mutiny have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Michigan Jaguars FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.7 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Edgewater Castle, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Edgewater Castle improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, Olé Eagles Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Olé Eagles Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses.
• Indiana United FC Women is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 20% |
11 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% |
14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
23 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : New England Mutiny is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Olé Eagles Women is on the same track as New England Mutiny with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Edgewater Castle is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Baltimore Warriors FC Women, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.25 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Baltimore Blast WFC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : Indiana United FC Women's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 3 goals and conceded 18! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Indiana United FC Women play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 75% |
4 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
8 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
11 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
14 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
22 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
23 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
24 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Coppermine United has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.4.
• Edgewater Castle has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Coppermine United.
• Indiana United FC Women's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Indiana United FC Women managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Worcester Smiles CIR Club's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Worcester Smiles CIR Club is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
14 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
27 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Racing Power Futures Women is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Racing Power Futures Women have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• Coppermine United is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff