- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- UWS
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - UWS
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 8 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 25 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 27 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Michigan Jaguars FC
is currently the most in form team in the UWS. They picked up an average of 2 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Michigan Legends FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
SoCal FC Women
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Tulip City United Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
San Fernando Valley Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Baltimore Blast WFC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- UWS (USA) Form Table consists of 33 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the UWS is Michigan Jaguars FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the UWS is Baltimore Blast WFC
Last 10 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 90% |
| 5 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 50% | 40% | 30% |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 28 | -12 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For UWS
• During the last 10 games, Michigan Jaguars FC have been doing really well with 2.1 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the UWS just based on the last 10 matches.
• Michigan Legends FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are SoCal FC Women, whose tally of 19 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.9 points per game. Can SoCal FC Women improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 UWS games, Crystal Lake Force Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Crystal Lake Force Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses.
• Baltimore Blast WFC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the UWS. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Michigan Jaguars FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Michigan Legends FC is on the same track as Michigan Jaguars FC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : SoCal FC Women is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes New England Mutiny, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : San Fernando Valley Women has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the UWS.
• Dangerously poor : Baltimore Blast WFC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the UWS. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 0 goals and conceded 13! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Baltimore Blast WFC play.
Home - Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 4 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Michigan Jaguars FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Michigan Legends FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the UWS home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Michigan Jaguars FC.
• San Fernando Valley Women's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. San Fernando Valley Women managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in UWS at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Tulip City United Women's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 2 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Tulip City United Women is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atlético | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Racing Power Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• SoCal FC Women is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. SoCal FC Women have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the UWS.
• Tulip City United Women is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff

































