Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU UWS

Competición
Goles
- Estadísticas en esta categoría :
- Clasificación Local y Visitante -
- Clasificación de Forma -
- Ventaja Local -
- Predicciones -
- Asistencia -
- Estadísticas de Jugadores -
- Empates -
- Salarios
Clasificación de Forma - UWS
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | Siguiente Partido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 21 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 24 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 26 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
TABLA DE FORMA ÚLTIMOS 5 (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Last 5 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
¿A qué equipos les está yendo bien según los últimos 5 partidos? - Guía de forma
• Excelente : Midwest United FC lo está haciendo excepcionalmente bien con 3 puntos ganados por juego en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Muy bien: Michigan Jaguars FC está en el mismo camino que Midwest United FC con un promedio de 3 puntos por partido en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Bien: New England Mutiny es el tercer equipo con mejor desempeño con 2 victorias y 0 derrotas en los últimos 5 partidos con una media de 3 puntos por partido.
• Rendimiento promedio : hay equipos que han estado en el promedio últimamente. Esto incluye a FC Pontiac Women, cuyas 1 victorias, 0 empates y 1 derrotas los llevan a una cantidad decepcionante de 1.5 puntos por partido en lo que va de temporada.
• No le va bien: San Fernando Valley Women se ha desempeñado por debajo del promedio en comparación con otros equipos con 0 victorias en los últimos 5 partidos. Esto los lleva a un promedio de puntos de 0 por partido, lo que lo convierte en uno de los equipos con peor desempeño de la temporada. A este ritmo, pueden correr el riesgo de descender y caer de la UWS.
• Peligrosamente pobre: el rendimiento de Michigan Jaguars II Women ha sido estadísticamente el más débil en la UWS. Recientemente han sido pésimos con solo 0 victorias en los últimos 5 juegos. El promedio de puntos por juego resulta ser 0, lo que los convierte en los de peor desempeño. ¡Solo han marcado 3 goles y encajado 13! Si siguen así, no estamos seguros de que los fanáticos puedan soportar asistir a más partidos del Michigan Jaguars II Women.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA LOCAL (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma en casa?
• Internacional Club Atletico ha estado muy bien jugando de local con con - 1 derrotas y 2 victorias en los ultimos 6 partidos en su casa. Su promedio de puntos por partido es el más alto comparando con otros clubes con 2.
• FC Pontiac Women está con excelentes actuaciones en su estadio. Con 1 victorias, 0 empates y 1 derrotas. Su forma os lleva al segundo lugar en la tabla de forma local de UWS. El promedio de puntos por partido es 1.5, que es casi tan bueno como lo de Internacional Club Atletico.
• El rendimiento del Maine Mystics Women ha sido inferior al estándar en su estadio. El Maine Mystics Women logró obtener solo 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados en su sede local. Su promedio de puntos por juego es 0, lo que los convierte en el segundo equipo con peor desempeño en UWS en casa.
• Triste, simplemente lamentable. Las actuaciones de Tulip City United Women han sido pésimas en casa. Con 0 victorias, 0 empates, 2 derrotas y solo 0 de puntos por juego en sus últimos 6 juegos en casa, el Tulip City United Women no está bien delante de sus aficcionados.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA VISITANTE (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma fuera de casa?
• Midwest United FC está en una racha increíble jugando de visitante. Consiguieron acumular 2 wins en sus últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa. El Midwest United FC tiene el mayor número de puntos con 6, lo que lo convierte en el mejor equipo jugando fuera de casa en la UWS.
• El Maine Mystics Women está teniendo una mala racha en los partidos fuera de casa. Sigue siendo el peor con 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa, lo que es bastante desfavorable para el club y su afición.
Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 1
- División 4
- División 3
- División 4
- División 2
- División 3
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 3
































