Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU UWS

Competición
Goles
- Estadísticas en esta categoría :
- Clasificación Local y Visitante -
- Clasificación de Forma -
- Ventaja Local -
- Predicciones -
- Asistencia -
- Estadísticas de Jugadores -
- Empates -
- Salarios
Clasificación de Forma - UWS
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | Siguiente Partido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | United City II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 4 | 25 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Troy City W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 37 | -34 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 25 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
TABLA DE FORMA ÚLTIMOS 5 (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Last 5 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | United City II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 30 | -27 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
¿A qué equipos les está yendo bien según los últimos 5 partidos? - Guía de forma
• Excelente : Baltimore Blast W lo está haciendo excepcionalmente bien con 2.6 puntos ganados por juego en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Muy bien: Michigan Jaguars FC está en el mismo camino que Baltimore Blast W con un promedio de 2.6 puntos por partido en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Bien: Racing Power W es el tercer equipo con mejor desempeño con 4 victorias y 1 derrotas en los últimos 5 partidos con una media de 2.4 puntos por partido.
• Rendimiento promedio : hay equipos que han estado en el promedio últimamente. Esto incluye a Chicago Inter Women, cuyas 3 victorias, 1 empates y 1 derrotas los llevan a una cantidad decepcionante de 2 puntos por partido en lo que va de temporada.
• No le va bien: San Fernando Valley Women se ha desempeñado por debajo del promedio en comparación con otros equipos con 0 victorias en los últimos 5 partidos. Esto los lleva a un promedio de puntos de 0 por partido, lo que lo convierte en uno de los equipos con peor desempeño de la temporada. A este ritmo, pueden correr el riesgo de descender y caer de la UWS.
• Peligrosamente pobre: el rendimiento de MSI Soccer W ha sido estadísticamente el más débil en la UWS. Recientemente han sido pésimos con solo 0 victorias en los últimos 5 juegos. El promedio de puntos por juego resulta ser 0, lo que los convierte en los de peor desempeño. ¡Solo han marcado 1 goles y encajado 21! Si siguen así, no estamos seguros de que los fanáticos puedan soportar asistir a más partidos del MSI Soccer W.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA LOCAL (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 21 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 14 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 32 | -31 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma en casa?
• Racing Power W ha estado muy bien jugando de local con con - 0 derrotas y 4 victorias en los ultimos 6 partidos en su casa. Su promedio de puntos por partido es el más alto comparando con otros clubes con 3.
• United City II está con excelentes actuaciones en su estadio. Con 3 victorias, 1 empates y 0 derrotas. Su forma os lleva al segundo lugar en la tabla de forma local de UWS. El promedio de puntos por partido es 2.5, que es casi tan bueno como lo de Racing Power W.
• El rendimiento del San Fernando Valley Women ha sido inferior al estándar en su estadio. El San Fernando Valley Women logró obtener solo 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados en su sede local. Su promedio de puntos por juego es 0, lo que los convierte en el segundo equipo con peor desempeño en UWS en casa.
• Triste, simplemente lamentable. Las actuaciones de Maine Mystics Women han sido pésimas en casa. Con 0 victorias, 0 empates, 4 derrotas y solo 0 de puntos por juego en sus últimos 6 juegos en casa, el Maine Mystics Women no está bien delante de sus aficcionados.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA VISITANTE (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | United City II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma fuera de casa?
• Midwest United FC está en una racha increíble jugando de visitante. Consiguieron acumular 4 wins en sus últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa. El Midwest United FC tiene el mayor número de puntos con 13, lo que lo convierte en el mejor equipo jugando fuera de casa en la UWS.
• El San Fernando Valley Women está teniendo una mala racha en los partidos fuera de casa. Sigue siendo el peor con 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa, lo que es bastante desfavorable para el club y su afición.
Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 1
- División 4
- División 3
- División 4
- División 2
- División 3
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 3

































