Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU UWS

Competición
Goles
- Estadísticas en esta categoría :
- Clasificación Local y Visitante -
- Clasificación de Forma -
- Ventaja Local -
- Predicciones -
- Asistencia -
- Estadísticas de Jugadores -
- Empates -
- Salarios
Clasificación de Forma - UWS
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | Siguiente Partido | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% | |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 23 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Troy City W | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 28 | -25 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 20 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
TABLA DE FORMA ÚLTIMOS 5 (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Last 5 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 26 | -24 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
¿A qué equipos les está yendo bien según los últimos 5 partidos? - Guía de forma
• Excelente : Flint City AFC lo está haciendo excepcionalmente bien con 3 puntos ganados por juego en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Muy bien: Racing Power W está en el mismo camino que Flint City AFC con un promedio de 3 puntos por partido en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Bien: Michigan Jaguars FC es el tercer equipo con mejor desempeño con 4 victorias y 0 derrotas en los últimos 5 partidos con una media de 2.6 puntos por partido.
• Rendimiento promedio : hay equipos que han estado en el promedio últimamente. Esto incluye a Midwest United FC, cuyas 3 victorias, 1 empates y 1 derrotas los llevan a una cantidad decepcionante de 2 puntos por partido en lo que va de temporada.
• No le va bien: MSI Soccer W se ha desempeñado por debajo del promedio en comparación con otros equipos con 0 victorias en los últimos 5 partidos. Esto los lleva a un promedio de puntos de 0 por partido, lo que lo convierte en uno de los equipos con peor desempeño de la temporada. A este ritmo, pueden correr el riesgo de descender y caer de la UWS.
• Peligrosamente pobre: el rendimiento de San Fernando Valley Women ha sido estadísticamente el más débil en la UWS. Recientemente han sido pésimos con solo 0 victorias en los últimos 5 juegos. El promedio de puntos por juego resulta ser 0, lo que los convierte en los de peor desempeño. ¡Solo han marcado 4 goles y encajado 22! Si siguen así, no estamos seguros de que los fanáticos puedan soportar asistir a más partidos del San Fernando Valley Women.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA LOCAL (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma en casa?
• Flint City AFC ha estado muy bien jugando de local con con - 0 derrotas y 3 victorias en los ultimos 6 partidos en su casa. Su promedio de puntos por partido es el más alto comparando con otros clubes con 3.
• Michigan Jaguars FC está con excelentes actuaciones en su estadio. Con 2 victorias, 0 empates y 0 derrotas. Su forma os lleva al segundo lugar en la tabla de forma local de UWS. El promedio de puntos por partido es 3, que es casi tan bueno como lo de Flint City AFC.
• El rendimiento del Lancaster Women ha sido inferior al estándar en su estadio. El Lancaster Women logró obtener solo 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados en su sede local. Su promedio de puntos por juego es 0, lo que los convierte en el segundo equipo con peor desempeño en UWS en casa.
• Triste, simplemente lamentable. Las actuaciones de Maine Mystics Women han sido pésimas en casa. Con 0 victorias, 0 empates, 3 derrotas y solo 0 de puntos por juego en sus últimos 6 juegos en casa, el Maine Mystics Women no está bien delante de sus aficcionados.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA VISITANTE (UWS)
| # | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% |
| 8 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma fuera de casa?
• Flint City AFC está en una racha increíble jugando de visitante. Consiguieron acumular 4 wins en sus últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa. El Flint City AFC tiene el mayor número de puntos con 12, lo que lo convierte en el mejor equipo jugando fuera de casa en la UWS.
• El MSI Soccer W está teniendo una mala racha en los partidos fuera de casa. Sigue siendo el peor con 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa, lo que es bastante desfavorable para el club y su afición.
Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 1
- División 4
- División 3
- División 4
- División 2
- División 3
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 3
































