Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU UWS

Competición
Goles
- Estadísticas en esta categoría :
- Clasificación Local y Visitante -
- Clasificación de Forma -
- Ventaja Local -
- Predicciones -
- Asistencia -
- Estadísticas de Jugador -
- Empates -
- Salarios
Clasificación de Forma - UWS
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | Siguiente Partido | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | - |
2 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
6 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
7 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 50% | - |
8 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
9 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
10 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
11 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 83% | - |
12 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
13 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
14 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% | - |
15 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
16 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
17 | ![]() | Pass W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | - |
18 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
19 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | - |
21 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
22 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
23 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | - |
24 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | - |
27 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
28 | ![]() | Troy City W | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
29 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
30 | ![]() | FC Arizona Femenino | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
31 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% | - |
32 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
33 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
34 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
35 | ![]() | Players SC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 67% | - |
36 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
37 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | - | |
38 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 43 | -38 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 33 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% | - |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
41 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% | - |
TABLA DE FORMA ÚLTIMOS 5 (UWS)
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Last 5 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Pass W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
31 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Players SC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | FC Arizona Femenino | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 37 | -35 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 33 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
¿A qué equipos les está yendo bien según los últimos 5 partidos? - Guía de forma
• Excelente : New England Mutiny lo está haciendo excepcionalmente bien con 2.6 puntos ganados por juego en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Muy bien: Santa Clarita Blue Heat está en el mismo camino que New England Mutiny con un promedio de 2.6 puntos por partido en los últimos 5 partidos.
• Bien: Coppermine United es el tercer equipo con mejor desempeño con 4 victorias y 1 derrotas en los últimos 5 partidos con una media de 2.4 puntos por partido.
• Rendimiento promedio : hay equipos que han estado en el promedio últimamente. Esto incluye a FC Buffalo, cuyas 3 victorias, 1 empates y 1 derrotas los llevan a una cantidad decepcionante de 2 puntos por partido en lo que va de temporada.
• No le va bien: Michigan Burn SC se ha desempeñado por debajo del promedio en comparación con otros equipos con 0 victorias en los últimos 5 partidos. Esto los lleva a un promedio de puntos de 0 por partido, lo que lo convierte en uno de los equipos con peor desempeño de la temporada. A este ritmo, pueden correr el riesgo de descender y caer de la UWS.
• Peligrosamente pobre: el rendimiento de New York Magic W ha sido estadísticamente el más débil en la UWS. Recientemente han sido pésimos con solo 0 victorias en los últimos 5 juegos. El promedio de puntos por juego resulta ser 0, lo que los convierte en los de peor desempeño. ¡Solo han marcado 2 goles y encajado 37! Si siguen así, no estamos seguros de que los fanáticos puedan soportar asistir a más partidos del New York Magic W.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA LOCAL (UWS)
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 1 | 33 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Pass W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
12 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
16 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
18 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
20 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
32 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | FC Arizona Femenino | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 75% |
34 | ![]() | Players SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 14 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma en casa?
• New England Mutiny ha estado muy bien jugando de local con con - 0 derrotas y 6 victorias en los ultimos 6 partidos en su casa. Su promedio de puntos por partido es el más alto comparando con otros clubes con 3.
• Santa Clarita Blue Heat está con excelentes actuaciones en su estadio. Con 5 victorias, 1 empates y 0 derrotas. Su forma os lleva al segundo lugar en la tabla de forma local de UWS. El promedio de puntos por partido es 2.67, que es casi tan bueno como lo de New England Mutiny.
• El rendimiento del New York Magic W ha sido inferior al estándar en su estadio. El New York Magic W logró obtener solo 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados en su sede local. Su promedio de puntos por juego es 0, lo que los convierte en el segundo equipo con peor desempeño en UWS en casa.
• Triste, simplemente lamentable. Las actuaciones de Worcester Smiles CIR Club han sido pésimas en casa. Con 0 victorias, 0 empates, 4 derrotas y solo 0 de puntos por juego en sus últimos 6 juegos en casa, el Worcester Smiles CIR Club no está bien delante de sus aficcionados.
CLASIFICACIÓN FORMA VISITANTE (UWS)
# | Equipo | PJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | Últimos 6 | PPP | Pa0 | PSM | AEM | Más de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
5 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
17 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 34 | -27 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 25% |
28 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
30 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | FC Arizona Femenino | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Players SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
36 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
38 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Pass W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
¿Qué equipos tienen la mejor y la peor forma fuera de casa?
• Michigan Jaguars FC está en una racha increíble jugando de visitante. Consiguieron acumular 5 wins en sus últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa. El Michigan Jaguars FC tiene el mayor número de puntos con 15, lo que lo convierte en el mejor equipo jugando fuera de casa en la UWS.
• El Worcester Smiles CIR Club está teniendo una mala racha en los partidos fuera de casa. Sigue siendo el peor con 0 victorias en los últimos 6 partidos jugados fuera de casa, lo que es bastante desfavorable para el club y su afición.
Clasificación de Forma - EE.UU
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 1
- División 4
- División 3
- División 4
- División 2
- División 3
- División 1
- División 2
- División 4
- División 3