Formtabelle - VS UWS

Wettbewerb
Tore
- Statistiken in dieser Kategorie :
- Heim- & Auswärtstabelle -
- Formtabelle -
- Heimvorteil -
- Vorhersagen -
- Zuschauerzahl -
- Spielerstatistiken -
- Untentschieden -
- Gehalt
Formtabelle - UWS
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | Nächstes Spiel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 21 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 24 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 26 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
LETZTEN 5 FORMTABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Last 5 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Welche Teams schneiden basierend auf der Form der letzten 5 Spiele gut ab? - Formrichtung
• Ausgezeichnet : Midwest United FC schneidet mit 3 Punkten pro Spiel, die in den letzten 5 Spielen erzielt wurden, außergewöhnlich gut ab.
• Sehr gut : Michigan Jaguars FC ist auf der gleichen Strecke wie Midwest United FC mit einem Durchschnitt von 3 Punkten pro Spiel in den letzten 5 Spielen.
• Ziemlich gut : New England Mutiny ist das drittbeste Team mit 2 Siegen und 0 Niederlagen in den letzten 5 Spielen mit durchschnittlich 3 Punkten pro Spiel.
• Durchschnittliche Leistung : Es gibt ein paar Teams, die in letzter Zeit absolut durchschnittlich waren. Dazu gehört FC Pontiac Women, dessen 1 Siege, 0 Unentschieden und 1 Niederlagen sie in dieser Saison bisher auf 1.5 Punkte pro Spiel gebracht haben.
• Nicht gut : San Fernando Valley Women hat im Vergleich zu anderen Teams mit 0 Siegen in den letzten 5 Spielen eine unterdurchschnittliche Leistung gezeigt. Dies bringt sie auf einen Durchschnitt von 0 Punkten pro Spiel und ist damit eines der leistungsschwächsten Teams der Saison. Bei diesem Tempo riskieren sie möglicherweise die Relegation oder steigen aus der UWS ab.
• Gefährlich schlecht : Die Leistung von Michigan Jaguars II Women war statistisch gesehen die schwächste in der UWS. Sie waren in letzter Zeitl mit nur 0 Siegen in den letzten 5 Spielen miserabel. Die durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 0, was sie zum schlechtesten Performer macht. Sie haben nur 3 Tore erzielt und 13 kassiert! Wenn sie so weitermachen, sind wir uns nicht sicher, ob die Fans es ertragen können, Michigan Jaguars II Women spielen zu sehen.
HEIMFORM TABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | United City II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Welche Teams haben die besten und schlechtesten Heimformen?
• Internacional Club Atletico war in den letzten 6 Heimspielen das beste Team in seinem Heimstadion mit 1 Niederlagen und 2 Siegen. Ihre durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel ist unter allen anderen Vereinen mit 2 am höchsten.
• FC Pontiac Women hat in seinem Heimstadion hervorragende Leistungen gezeigt. Mit 1 Siegen, 0 Unentschieden und 1 Niederlagen. Ihre Form bringt sie auf den 2. Platz in der Heimformtabelle von UWS. Die durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 1.5, was fast so gut ist wie Internacional Club Atletico.
• Die Leistung von Maine Mystics Women war in ihrem Heimstadion unterdurchschnittlich. Maine Mystics Women hat es geschafft, in den letzten 6 Spielen, die in seinem Heimstadion gespielt wurden, nur 0 Siege zu erzielen. Ihre durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 0, was sie zu Hause zur zweitschlechtesten Mannschaft in der UWS macht.
• Schade, einfach nur schade. Die Leistungen von Tulip City United Women waren zu Hause schrecklich. Mit 0 Siegen, 0 Unentschieden, 2 Niederlagen und nur 0 Punkten pro Spiel in den letzten 6 Heimspielen, die vorgewiesen werden können, kann Tulip City United Women seine Leistung bei Heimspielen nicht abrufen.
AUSWÄRTSFORM TABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Troy City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Welche Teams haben die besten und schlechtesten Auswärtsformen?
• Midwest United FC hat bei Auswärtsspielen einen unglaublichen Lauf. Sie haben es geschafft, in den letzten 6 Auswärtsspielen 2 Siege einzufahren. Midwest United FC hat mit 6 die höchste Punktzahl, was sie zum besten Performer an den Auswärtsspielorten in der UWS macht.
• Maine Mystics Women hat bei Auswärtsspielen einen enttäuschenden Lauf. Sie bleiben mit 0 Siegen in den letzten 6 auswärts gespielten Spielen das schlechteste Team, was für den Verein und seine Fans sehr nachteilig ist.
Formtabelle - VS
- Klasse 1
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 1
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 3
- Pokal
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 3
- Klasse 1
- Pokal
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 3
- Pokal
- Pokal
- Pokal
- Pokal
































