Formtabelle - VS UWS

Wettbewerb
Tore
- Statistiken in dieser Kategorie :
- Heim- & Auswärtstabelle -
- Formtabelle -
- Heimvorteil -
- Vorhersagen -
- Zuschauerzahl -
- Spielerstatistiken -
- Untentschieden -
- Gehalt
Formtabelle - UWS
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | Nächstes Spiel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% | |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
LETZTEN 5 FORMTABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Last 5 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Welche Teams schneiden basierend auf der Form der letzten 5 Spiele gut ab? - Formrichtung
• Ausgezeichnet : Flint City AFC schneidet mit 3 Punkten pro Spiel, die in den letzten 5 Spielen erzielt wurden, außergewöhnlich gut ab.
• Sehr gut : Racing Power W ist auf der gleichen Strecke wie Flint City AFC mit einem Durchschnitt von 3 Punkten pro Spiel in den letzten 5 Spielen.
• Ziemlich gut : Michigan Jaguars FC ist das drittbeste Team mit 4 Siegen und 0 Niederlagen in den letzten 5 Spielen mit durchschnittlich 2.6 Punkten pro Spiel.
• Durchschnittliche Leistung : Es gibt ein paar Teams, die in letzter Zeit absolut durchschnittlich waren. Dazu gehört Worcester Wanderers Women, dessen 3 Siege, 0 Unentschieden und 2 Niederlagen sie in dieser Saison bisher auf 1.8 Punkte pro Spiel gebracht haben.
• Nicht gut : Pinnacle Women hat im Vergleich zu anderen Teams mit 0 Siegen in den letzten 5 Spielen eine unterdurchschnittliche Leistung gezeigt. Dies bringt sie auf einen Durchschnitt von 0 Punkten pro Spiel und ist damit eines der leistungsschwächsten Teams der Saison. Bei diesem Tempo riskieren sie möglicherweise die Relegation oder steigen aus der UWS ab.
• Gefährlich schlecht : Die Leistung von San Fernando Valley Women war statistisch gesehen die schwächste in der UWS. Sie waren in letzter Zeitl mit nur 0 Siegen in den letzten 5 Spielen miserabel. Die durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 0, was sie zum schlechtesten Performer macht. Sie haben nur 4 Tore erzielt und 22 kassiert! Wenn sie so weitermachen, sind wir uns nicht sicher, ob die Fans es ertragen können, San Fernando Valley Women spielen zu sehen.
HEIMFORM TABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Troy City W | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Welche Teams haben die besten und schlechtesten Heimformen?
• Flint City AFC war in den letzten 6 Heimspielen das beste Team in seinem Heimstadion mit 0 Niederlagen und 3 Siegen. Ihre durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel ist unter allen anderen Vereinen mit 3 am höchsten.
• Michigan Jaguars FC hat in seinem Heimstadion hervorragende Leistungen gezeigt. Mit 2 Siegen, 0 Unentschieden und 0 Niederlagen. Ihre Form bringt sie auf den 2. Platz in der Heimformtabelle von UWS. Die durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 3, was fast so gut ist wie Flint City AFC.
• Die Leistung von Lancaster Women war in ihrem Heimstadion unterdurchschnittlich. Lancaster Women hat es geschafft, in den letzten 6 Spielen, die in seinem Heimstadion gespielt wurden, nur 0 Siege zu erzielen. Ihre durchschnittliche Punktzahl pro Spiel beträgt 0, was sie zu Hause zur zweitschlechtesten Mannschaft in der UWS macht.
• Schade, einfach nur schade. Die Leistungen von Maine Mystics Women waren zu Hause schrecklich. Mit 0 Siegen, 0 Unentschieden, 3 Niederlagen und nur 0 Punkten pro Spiel in den letzten 6 Heimspielen, die vorgewiesen werden können, kann Maine Mystics Women seine Leistung bei Heimspielen nicht abrufen.
AUSWÄRTSFORM TABELLE (UWS)
| # | Team | SP | S | U | N | T | GT | TD | Pkt | Letzte 6 | PPS | ZNS | Verschossen | BTTS | Über 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Welche Teams haben die besten und schlechtesten Auswärtsformen?
• Flint City AFC hat bei Auswärtsspielen einen unglaublichen Lauf. Sie haben es geschafft, in den letzten 6 Auswärtsspielen 4 Siege einzufahren. Flint City AFC hat mit 12 die höchste Punktzahl, was sie zum besten Performer an den Auswärtsspielorten in der UWS macht.
• MSI Soccer W hat bei Auswärtsspielen einen enttäuschenden Lauf. Sie bleiben mit 0 Siegen in den letzten 6 auswärts gespielten Spielen das schlechteste Team, was für den Verein und seine Fans sehr nachteilig ist.
Formtabelle - VS
- Klasse 1
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 1
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 3
- Pokal
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 3
- Klasse 1
- Pokal
- Klasse 2
- Klasse 4
- Klasse 3
- Pokal
- Pokal
- Pokal
- Pokal
































