Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
Colorado Rapids II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.New York Red Bulls II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.New England Revolution II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.FC Cincinnati II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Sporting Kansas City II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Colorado Rapids II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 27 | 12 | 15 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
4 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 16 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
6 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
7 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
12 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 22 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
16 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 22 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
22 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 26 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
27 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 28 | -10 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 28 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 31 | -20 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, New England Revolution II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• St. Louis City SC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Colorado Rapids II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Colorado Rapids II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Carolina Core FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Carolina Core FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.5 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
20 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
22 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
23 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Colorado Rapids II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : New England Revolution II is on the same track as Colorado Rapids II with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Vancouver Whitecaps FC II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Carolina Core FC, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Tacoma Defiance has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 3 goals and conceded 19! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
24 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
27 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
28 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Colorado Rapids II has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Dick's Sporting Goods Park) with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.33.
• New England Revolution II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Colorado Rapids II.
• Los Angeles Galaxy II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Los Angeles Galaxy II managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.5 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Sporting Kansas City II's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 0 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.5 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Sporting Kansas City II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
5 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
15 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
20 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
23 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
25 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 33% |
26 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
28 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• St. Louis City SC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. St. Louis City SC II have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Columbus Crew II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff