Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
St. Louis City SC II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Chicago Fire Premier FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Philadelphia Union II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Chattanooga FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Columbus Crew II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is St. Louis City SC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Columbus Crew II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 12 | 18 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
2 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 70% |
4 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
6 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
8 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
9 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
11 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
22 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 26 | -11 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 30 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 26 | -16 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, St. Louis City SC II have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Chicago Fire Premier FC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Philadelphia Union II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Philadelphia Union II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, New England Revolution II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New England Revolution II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• Columbus Crew II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.4 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
10 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
22 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : St. Louis City SC II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Chicago Fire Premier FC II is on the same track as St. Louis City SC II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Huntsville City FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes FC Cincinnati II, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Tacoma Defiance has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Columbus Crew II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 6 goals and conceded 15! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Columbus Crew II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
5 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
12 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
16 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
25 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
26 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• San Jose Earthquakes II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• St. Louis City SC II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as San Jose Earthquakes II.
• Tacoma Defiance's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Tacoma Defiance managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.5 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Sporting Kansas City II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Sporting Kansas City II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
7 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
10 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
16 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
22 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
26 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 21 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Los Angeles Galaxy II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Los Angeles Galaxy II have the highest points tally with 14 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Columbus Crew II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff