Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 2 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | |
| 19 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 50% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Austin FC II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
New York City FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Columbus Crew II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Toronto FC II USL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Sporting Kansas City II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Austin FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 70% |
| 2 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 8 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 26 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 28 | -13 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 29 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Austin FC II have been doing really well with 2.7 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• New York City FC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are New England Revolution II, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can New England Revolution II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Los Angeles Football Club 2 fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Los Angeles Football Club 2 is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.1 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : New York City FC II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Connecticut United is on the same track as New York City FC II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Austin FC II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes New England Revolution II, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : St. Louis City SC II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.2 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Toronto FC II USL's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 5 goals and conceded 16! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Toronto FC II USL play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 18 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 13 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
| 27 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Houston Dynamo FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Columbus Crew II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Houston Dynamo FC II.
• Sporting Kansas City II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Sporting Kansas City II managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.67 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 2 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.33 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 17% |
| 4 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 14 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 21 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 22 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 17 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Austin FC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Austin FC II have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























