Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 17% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
Chattanooga FC
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Minnesota United FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Philadelphia Union II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Sporting Kansas City II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Chattanooga FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Sporting Kansas City II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 30% |
| 3 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 10 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 20 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 22 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 17 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 22 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
| 22 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 25 | -12 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 28 | -14 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 28 | -13 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Chattanooga FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Austin FC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Los Angeles Galaxy II, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can Los Angeles Galaxy II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Huntsville City FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Huntsville City FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses.
• FC Cincinnati II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.5 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| 24 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Chattanooga FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Austin FC II is on the same track as Chattanooga FC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Minnesota United FC II is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Toronto FC II USL, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Chicago Fire Premier FC II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 1 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.6 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Sporting Kansas City II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 1 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.6 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 6 goals and conceded 18! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Sporting Kansas City II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 19 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 22 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Chattanooga FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• New York City FC II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Chattanooga FC.
• FC Cincinnati II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. FC Cincinnati II managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.33 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Houston Dynamo FC II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 2 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.33 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Houston Dynamo FC II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 17% |
| 9 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 21 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) have the highest points tally with 13 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























