Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 17% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 33% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
St. Louis City SC II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.New York Red Bulls II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Philadelphia Union II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Tacoma Defiance
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Houston Dynamo FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Sporting Kansas City II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is St. Louis City SC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Sporting Kansas City II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 9 | 17 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 70% |
7 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
8 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 18 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
11 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
12 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 30% |
15 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 24 | -7 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
17 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
21 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
26 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 25 | -10 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, New York Red Bulls II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Philadelphia Union II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are St. Louis City SC II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can St. Louis City SC II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Toronto FC II USL fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Toronto FC II USL is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses.
• Sporting Kansas City II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.4 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
15 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
20 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
21 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 20% |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : St. Louis City SC II is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : New York Red Bulls II is on the same track as St. Louis City SC II with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Real Monarchs SLC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes New York City FC II, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Houston Dynamo FC II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.6 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Sporting Kansas City II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.4 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 2 goals and conceded 9! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Sporting Kansas City II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
11 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
17 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
20 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
22 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
23 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
24 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
26 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• St. Louis City SC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• New York Red Bulls II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as St. Louis City SC II.
• Carolina Core FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Carolina Core FC managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Sporting Kansas City II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Sporting Kansas City II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
7 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
19 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
20 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
24 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Los Angeles Galaxy II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Los Angeles Galaxy II have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Columbus Crew II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff