Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 5 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | |
| 7 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | |
| 8 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 21 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 17% | |
| 22 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
Los Angeles Galaxy II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Portland Timbers II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Chattanooga FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Real Monarchs SLC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Orlando City II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FC Cincinnati II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Los Angeles Galaxy II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is FC Cincinnati II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 2 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 11 | 16 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 19 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 17 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 22 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 20 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 24 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 30% |
| 26 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 28 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 30 | -14 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Connecticut United have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Los Angeles Galaxy II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Portland Timbers II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Portland Timbers II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• FC Cincinnati II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.5 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Los Angeles Galaxy II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : New York Red Bulls II is on the same track as Los Angeles Galaxy II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Portland Timbers II is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes New York City FC II, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Orlando City II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 1 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.6 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Sporting Kansas City II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 14! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Sporting Kansas City II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Chicago Fire Premier FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Columbus Crew II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Chicago Fire Premier FC II.
• FC Cincinnati II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. FC Cincinnati II managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. New England Revolution II's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 1 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.67 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, New England Revolution II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 17% |
| 17 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 27 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Portland Timbers II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Portland Timbers II have the highest points tally with 14 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Sporting Kansas City II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























