Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
Huntsville City FC
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Minnesota United FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Atlanta United FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Sporting Kansas City II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Huntsville City FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Sporting Kansas City II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 9 | 17 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 20 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 20 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 18 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 21 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 17 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 21 | 22 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 25 | -12 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 28 | -14 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 28 | -13 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Los Angeles Galaxy II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Chattanooga FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Austin FC II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Austin FC II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, New York City FC II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New York City FC II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• FC Cincinnati II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.5 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| 5 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Minnesota United FC II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Huntsville City FC is on the same track as Minnesota United FC II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Chattanooga FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes San Jose Earthquakes II, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Chicago Fire Premier FC II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 1 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.6 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Sporting Kansas City II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 1 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.6 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 6 goals and conceded 18! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Sporting Kansas City II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 13 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 17 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 29 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Los Angeles Galaxy II has been the finest performer at their home stadium (HDC University Field 1) with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• Chattanooga FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Los Angeles Galaxy II.
• New England Revolution II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. New England Revolution II managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.67 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. FC Cincinnati II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 2 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.33 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, FC Cincinnati II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 17% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 21 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Huntsville City FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Huntsville City FC have the highest points tally with 13 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























