Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
St. Louis City SC II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Minnesota United FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Chattanooga FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Sporting Kansas City II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Atlanta United FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Colorado Rapids II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is St. Louis City SC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Colorado Rapids II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
2 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
3 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
5 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 20 | 1 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 20 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 25 | -7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
21 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 21 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
28 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 25 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, St. Louis City SC II have been doing really well with 2.2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• North Texas SC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Orlando City II, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can Orlando City II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Real Monarchs SLC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Real Monarchs SLC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses.
• Colorado Rapids II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.2 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
22 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
23 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : St. Louis City SC II is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Chattanooga FC is on the same track as St. Louis City SC II with an average of of 2.2 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : New York Red Bulls II is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Orlando City II, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Vancouver Whitecaps FC II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Colorado Rapids II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 5 goals and conceded 10! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Colorado Rapids II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
4 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
16 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
19 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
29 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Houston Dynamo FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• North Texas SC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.4 which is nearly as good as Houston Dynamo FC II.
• Huntsville City FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Huntsville City FC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Atlanta United FC II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Atlanta United FC II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
2 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
5 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
8 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 25% |
9 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
10 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
19 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
28 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Huntsville City FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Huntsville City FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Houston Dynamo FC II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff