Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 17% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 10 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | |
| 13 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 14 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 17% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Connecticut United
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Portland Timbers II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Los Angeles Galaxy II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
San Jose Earthquakes II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Real Monarchs SLC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Orlando City II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Connecticut United
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Orlando City II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 17 | 8 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 2 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 11 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| 15 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
| 22 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 30% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 27 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 27 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 28 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Connecticut United have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Los Angeles Galaxy II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Austin FC II, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Austin FC II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Atlanta United FC II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Atlanta United FC II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.6 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Los Angeles Galaxy II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Connecticut United is on the same track as Los Angeles Galaxy II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Austin FC II is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chicago Fire Premier FC II, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Orlando City II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Real Monarchs SLC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 3 goals and conceded 15! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Real Monarchs SLC play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
| 12 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 25 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Chicago Fire Premier FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Tacoma Defiance has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Cheney Stadium). With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Chicago Fire Premier FC II.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (). Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II managed to get just 2 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (). Their average points per game is 1.17 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. FC Cincinnati II's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0.83 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, FC Cincinnati II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
| 14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Portland Timbers II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Portland Timbers II have the highest points tally with 14 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Sporting Kansas City II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























