Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 8 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 15 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 24 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
Connecticut United
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Los Angeles Galaxy II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Portland Timbers II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Toronto FC II USL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Connecticut United
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 9 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 20 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 22 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 30% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 90% |
| 27 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 24 | -18 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Austin FC II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Connecticut United is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Tacoma Defiance, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Tacoma Defiance improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, New England Revolution II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New England Revolution II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.4 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Connecticut United is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Portland Timbers II is on the same track as Connecticut United with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Los Angeles Galaxy II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Atlanta United FC II, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : FC Cincinnati II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : New York Red Bulls II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 14! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching New York Red Bulls II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 20 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Los Angeles Galaxy II has been the finest performer at their home stadium (HDC University Field 1) with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• Houston Dynamo FC II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Los Angeles Galaxy II.
• Huntsville City FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Huntsville City FC managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 1 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.67 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 13 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
| 16 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 22 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Austin FC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Austin FC II have the highest points tally with 14 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























