Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 15 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 19 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
Austin FC II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Houston Dynamo FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Los Angeles Football Club 2
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Colorado Rapids II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Austin FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 25 | -5 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 25 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 24 | -16 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | 31 | -20 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, Houston Dynamo FC II have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Austin FC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are New York Red Bulls II, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can New York Red Bulls II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, New England Revolution II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New England Revolution II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.2 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 30 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Austin FC II is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Houston Dynamo FC II is on the same track as Austin FC II with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : New England Revolution II is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes New York City FC II, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Colorado Rapids II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 6 goals and conceded 18! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• Columbus Crew II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II).
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.2 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Colorado Rapids II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Colorado Rapids II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| 3 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 6 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 29 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Houston Dynamo FC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Houston Dynamo FC II have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• FC Cincinnati II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























