- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- UWS
- ›
- Home Advantage
Home Advantage - USA UWS
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Home Advantage - UWS
# | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | +29% | +100% | -43% | 0.00 /0.00 |
2 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | +53% | +67% | +38% | 0.00 /0.00 |
3 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | -17% | +33% | -67% | 0.00 /0.00 |
4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | +42% | -16% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
5 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | +50% | 0% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
6 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | +44% | +46% | +42% | 0.00 /0.00 |
7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | -41% | -65% | -16% | 0.00 /0.00 |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | +62% | +24% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
9 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | +44% | +75% | +12% | 0.00 /0.00 |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | +43% | +14% | +71% | 0.00 /0.00 |
11 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | +55% | +34% | +75% | 0.00 /0.00 |
12 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | +14% | -21% | +48% | 0.00 /0.00 |
13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | -32% | -43% | -20% | 0.00 /0.00 |
14 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | +32% | +48% | +16% | 0.00 /0.00 |
15 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | +25% | 0% | +50% | 0.00 /0.00 |
16 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | +50% | 0% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
17 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | +20% | 0% | +39% | 0.00 /0.00 |
18 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | +20% | +50% | -11% | 0.00 /0.00 |
19 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | -18% | -13% | -23% | 0.00 /0.00 |
20 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | +18% | +45% | -9% | 0.00 /0.00 |
21 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | +31% | +12% | +50% | 0.00 /0.00 |
22 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | -7% | -3% | -10% | 0.00 /0.00 |
23 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | 0% | -100% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
24 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 0% | +33% | 0% | 0.00 /0.00 |
25 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 0% | -100% | 0% | 0.00 /0.00 |
26 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | -44% | -62% | -25% | 0.00 /0.00 |
27 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | +15% | +16% | +13% | 0.00 /0.00 |
28 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | +39% | +72% | +5% | 0.00 /0.00 |
29 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | +22% | +19% | +25% | 0.00 /0.00 |
1. Home Advantage : Increased overall performance levels of each team when they play at home venue.
2. Scoring : Increased likelihood of scoring more goals when the teams play at their home venue. Calculated based on the goals scored.
3. Defence : Increased likelihood of conceding less goals when the teams play at their home venue. Calculated based on the goals conceded.
Home Advantage is calculated based on how many more goals each team scores or concedes during their home matches.
This is an accurate way of measuring their home performance as it calculates using more accurate statistics rather than simply relying on match outcomes.
Which Team Has The Most Home Advantage in the UWS?
If we just talk about the home advantage of teams in the UWS, SoCal FC Women, New Jersey Alliance FC and Worcester Smiles CIR Club shows tremendous difference between home and away performance. For example, SoCal FC Women scored 0% more goals at the home games compared to away games and conceded nearly 0% less goals at their home ground. Following a similar pattern, New Jersey Alliance FC scored 0% more goals as the home team and conceded about 0% less goals. Going a little down the table New Jersey Copa FC Women and Flint City AFC are enjoying a mild 0% and 0% of scoring advantage at home. Moreover, in terms of defence at home, New Jersey Copa FC Women conceded 0% less goals at home and Flint City AFC shares similar stats of 0%.
Now, onto those UWS teams with 0 or negative home advantage which is rare. These teams are at the bottom of home advantage charts and they are Olé Eagles Women and Montgomery Soccer Inc Women. Neither team have been impressive at home. While Montgomery Soccer Inc Women scored 0% less goals playing at their home ground, Olé Eagles Women's output were also noticeably poor. Olé Eagles Women scored 0% less goals in their matches played home. They score more at away venues than at home. Olé Eagles Women also conceded 0% more goals at home, which is not only a rare occurrance, but also not a happy news for the Olé Eagles Women supporters.
Home Goals Scored Table (UWS)
# | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | +100% | 0 | 0 |
2 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | +67% | 0 | 0 |
3 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | +33% | 0 | 0 |
4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | -16% | 0 | 0 |
5 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | 0% | 0 | 0 |
6 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | +46% | 0 | 0 |
7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | -65% | 0 | 0 |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | +24% | 0 | 0 |
9 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | +75% | 0 | 0 |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | +14% | 0 | 0 |
11 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | +34% | 0 | 0 |
12 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | -21% | 0 | 0 |
13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | -43% | 0 | 0 |
14 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | +48% | 0 | 0 |
15 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | 0% | 0 | 0 |
16 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | 0% | 0 | 0 |
17 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | 0% | 0 | 0 |
18 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | +50% | 0 | 0 |
19 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | -13% | 0 | 0 |
20 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | +45% | 0 | 0 |
21 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | +12% | 0 | 0 |
22 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | -3% | 0 | 0 |
23 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | -100% | 0 | 0 |
24 | ![]() | Future FC Women | +33% | 0 | 0 |
25 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | -100% | 0 | 0 |
26 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | -62% | 0 | 0 |
27 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | +16% | 0 | 0 |
28 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | +72% | 0 | 0 |
29 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | +19% | 0 | 0 |
Home Defence (Conceded) Table (UWS)
# | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | SoCal FC Women | -43% | 0 | 0 |
2 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | +38% | 0 | 0 |
3 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | -67% | 0 | 0 |
4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | +100% | 0 | 0 |
5 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC Women | +100% | 0 | 0 |
6 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | +42% | 0 | 0 |
7 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | -16% | 0 | 0 |
8 | ![]() | Coppermine United | +100% | 0 | 0 |
9 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 W | +12% | 0 | 0 |
10 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | +71% | 0 | 0 |
11 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | +75% | 0 | 0 |
12 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | +48% | 0 | 0 |
13 | ![]() | Maine Footy | -20% | 0 | 0 |
14 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC Women | +16% | 0 | 0 |
15 | ![]() | Troy City WFC | +50% | 0 | 0 |
16 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey | +100% | 0 | 0 |
17 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors FC | +39% | 0 | 0 |
18 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | -11% | 0 | 0 |
19 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | -23% | 0 | 0 |
20 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | -9% | 0 | 0 |
21 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | +50% | 0 | 0 |
22 | ![]() | Tudela FC LA Women | -10% | 0 | 0 |
23 | ![]() | Inland Empire FC Women | +100% | 0 | 0 |
24 | ![]() | Future FC Women | 0% | 0 | 0 |
25 | ![]() | Racing Power Futures Women | 0% | 0 | 0 |
26 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors FC Women | -25% | 0 | 0 |
27 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast WFC | +13% | 0 | 0 |
28 | ![]() | Montgomery Soccer Inc Women | +5% | 0 | 0 |
29 | ![]() | Olé Eagles Women | +25% | 0 | 0 |
Home Advantage - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff