Form Tabell - USA UWS

Mål
- Statistik i denna kategori :
- Hem & bortatabeller -
- Formtabell -
- Hemmafördel -
- Prognos -
- Närvaro -
- Spelarstatistik -
- Oavgjort -
- Löner
Form Tabell - UWS
| # | Team | MP | V | O | F | MF | MM | MS | Png | Sista 6 | MPM | HN | MAG | BLGM | Över 2.5 | Nästa match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional CA | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% | |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% | |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Senaste 5 FORMTABELL (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | V | O | F | MF | MM | MS | Png | Last 5 | MPM | HN | MAG | BLGM | Över 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Internacional CA | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Vilka lag går det bra för baserat på senaste 5 matcherna - Form Guide
• Utmärkt : Flint City AFC klarar sig exceptionellt bra med 3 poäng mer match intjänade i de senaste 5 matcherna.
• Väldigt bra : Michigan Jaguars FC är på samma spår som Flint City AFC med ett snitt på 2.6 poäng per match i de senaste matcherna.
• Ganska bra : United City II är det 3:e mest välpresterande laget med 4 vinster och 0 förluster i de senaste 5 matcherna med ett snitt på 3 poäng per match.
• Genomsnittlig prestation : Det finns några lag som har varit rakt av helt okej. Detta inkluderar Chicago Inter Women vars 3 vinster, 0 oavgjorda och 2 förluster tar dem till en överväldigande 1.8 poäng per match hittills denna säsongen.
• Inte bra : MSI Soccer W har presterat undermåligt jämfört med andra lag med 0 vinster i de senaste 5 matcherna. Detta tar dem till ett genomsnitt på 0 poäng per match vilket gör det till ett av säsongens sämst presterande lag. I den här takten kan de riskera nedflyttning eller kastas ut ur UWS
• Otroligt dåligt : San Fernando Valley Women prestanda har statistiskt sett varit varit svagast i UWS. De har varit urusla den senaste tiden med bara 0 vinster de senaste 5 matcherna. De genomsnittliga poängen per match visas sig att vara 0 vilket gör dem till den sämsta presterande lagen. De har bara gjort 4 mål och släppt in 22!. Om de fortsätter med detta är vi inte säkra på om fansen bara kan titta på San Fernando Valley Women spela.
Hemma formtabell (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | V | O | F | MF | MM | MS | Png | Sista 6 | MPM | HN | MAG | BLGM | Över 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Internacional CA | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Midwest United | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | SoCal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Vilka lag har de bästa och sämsta hemmaformerna?
• Michigan Jaguars FC har varit den bästa lagen på sina hemmaarena med 0 förluster och 2 vinster i de senaste 6 matcherna på hemmaplan. Deras genomsnittliga poäng per match står högst bland alla klubbar med 3.
• United City II har visat utmärkta prestationer på sin hemmaarena . Med 2 vinster, 0 oavgjort och 0 förluster. Deras form tar dem till 2:a plats i UWS hemformtabellen. Genomsnittliga poäng per match kommer ut som 3 vilket är nästan lika bra som Michigan Jaguars FC.
• Lansing City Women:s prestationer har varit undermåliga på deras hemmaarena. Lansing City Women lyckades få bara 0 vinster i de senaste 6 matcher som spelades på deras hemmaarena. Deras genomsnittliga poäng per match är 0 vilket gör dem till det 2:a sämst presterande laget i UWS på hemmaplan.
• Bedrövligt, bara bedrövligt. Maine Mystics Women:s prestationer har varit hemska på hemmaplan. Med 0 vinster, 0 oavgjorda, 3 förluster och bara 0 poäng per match i sina 6 senaste hemmamatcher att visa upp sig för, dyker Maine Mystics Women helt enkelt inte upp på hemmamatcher.
Borta formtabell (UWS)
| # | Team | MP | V | O | F | MF | MM | MS | Png | Sista 6 | MPM | HN | MAG | BLGM | Över 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Midwest United | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | SoCal | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Internacional CA | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Vilka lag har bäst och sämst bortaformer?
• Flint City AFC är på en otrolig resa som spelar på bortamatcher. De lyckades ta 4 vinster i sina 6 senaste matcher som spelades hemifrån. Flint City AFC har de högsta poängen med 12 vilket gör dem till den bästa presterande lagen på bortaplan i UWS.
• Lancaster Women är på en besvikelse på bortamatcher. De är fortfarande den sämsta med 0 vinster i de senaste 6 matcherna som spelats borta från deras hemmaarena, vilket är ganska ogynnsamt för klubben och deras fans.
Form Tabell - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup
- Cup
- Cup
































