- FootyStats的足球统计数据
- ›
- 美国
- ›
- UWS女子足球联赛
- ›
- 状态表
状态表 - UWS女子足球联赛
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | 下一场球赛 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | 新英格兰 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% | |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% | |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
最近5场比赛状态表 (UWS女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | Last 5 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | 新英格兰 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
根据Last 5 Form,哪些团队表现良好? - 表格指南
• 优异 :Flint City AFC 在过去 5 场比赛中,每场比赛都获得3分,表现地非常出色。
• 非常好:Michigan Jaguars FC与Flint City AFC在同一级别上,在过去的5场比赛中,平均每场比赛都得2.6分。
• 相当不错:United City II 是过去 5 场比赛中表现最佳的球队中,排名第三的球队,4获胜,0失败,每场比赛平均获得3分。
• 表现普通:最近有几支球队表现平平。这包括Chicago Inter Women,他们的3获胜、0平局和2失败,使他们本赛季到目前为止的场均得分为1.8分。
• 表现欠佳:MSI Soccer W在过去5场比赛中0获胜,表现不及其他球队。这使他们平均每场比赛得分为0分,使其成为本赛季表现最差的球队之一。按照这个节奏,他们可能会面临降级或被踢出UWS女子足球联赛的危险。
• 表现极差:San Fernando Valley Women的表现在联赛的统计上是UWS女子足球联赛中最弱的。他们最近很糟糕,在过去的5场比赛中只赢了0场。每场比赛的平均得分为0分,使他们成为表现最差的。他们只打进了4球和失22分。如果他们保持这种状态,我们不确定球迷是否会观看San Fernando Valley Women比赛。
主场状态表 (UWS女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | 新英格兰 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
在主场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• Michigan Jaguars FC在过去的6场主场比赛中,一直是主场表现最好的球队。有0场的败绩和2场的胜利。他们每场比赛的平均得分为3分,在所有俱乐部中排名最高。
• United City II 在他们的主场一直表现很出色。 2场的获胜,0场的平局和0局的失败。使他们在UWS女子足球联赛的主场纪录表格中排名第二。每场比赛的平均得分为3分,几乎与Michigan Jaguars FC一样好。
• Lansing City Women的表现在他们的主场中表现不佳。 Lansing City Women在主场中进行的近期6场比赛中只获得了0的胜利。他们每场比赛的平均得分是0分,这使他们成为主场UWS女子足球联赛中表现第二差的球队。
• 太惨了,简直惨不忍睹。 Maine Mystics Women在主场的表现很糟糕。凭借0场的获胜、0场的平局以和3场的失利,以及他们在过去6场主场比赛中每场比赛的0得分,Maine Mystics Women根本没有机会再出现在主场比赛中。
客场状态表 (UWS女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | 新英格兰 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Midwest United FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
在客场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• Flint City AFC在客场比赛中表现出色。他们在最近6场客场比赛中,都取得了4场的胜利。Flint City AFC获得了12分,这使他们成为UWS女子足球联赛的客场比赛中,表现最好的球队。
• Lancaster Women 在客场比赛中的表现令人失望。他们仍然是表现地最差的球队,在过去的6场客场比赛中取得了0场的胜利,这对俱乐部和他们的球迷来说是非常令人不快的。
状态表 - 美国
- 组别 1
- 组别 2
- 组别 4
- 组别 1
- 组别 4
- 组别 3
- 赛杯
- 组别 4
- 组别 2
- 组别 3
- 组别 1
- 赛杯
- 组别 2
- 组别 4
- 组别 3
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
- 赛杯

































