Tabel Performa - Amerika Serikat UWS

Kompetisi
Gol
- Statistik di kategori ini :
- Tabel Tuan Rumah & Laga Tandang -
- Tabel Performa -
- Keunggulan Kandang -
- Prediksi -
- Kehadiran -
- Statistik Pemain -
- Seri -
- Gaji
Tabel Performa - UWS
# | Tim | PD | M | S | K | GM | GA | SG | P | 6 Terakhir | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2,5 | Pertandingan Berikutnya | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | - |
2 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | - |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
6 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
7 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 50% | - |
8 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 12 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
9 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
10 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
11 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 83% | - |
12 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
13 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
14 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% | - |
15 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
16 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
17 | ![]() | Pass W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | - |
18 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
19 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
20 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | - |
21 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
22 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
23 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | - |
24 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
25 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | - |
27 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
28 | ![]() | Troy City W | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
29 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
30 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
31 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% | - |
32 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
33 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | - |
34 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
35 | ![]() | Players SC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 67% | - |
36 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
37 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | - | |
38 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 43 | -38 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 33 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% | - |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
41 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% | - |
TABEL 5 PERFORMA TERAKHIR (UWS)
# | Tim | PD | M | S | K | GM | GA | SG | P | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Pass W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Troy City W | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
31 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Players SC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 37 | -35 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 33 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
Tim Mana yang Berprestasi Baik Berdasarkan 5 Performa Terakhir? - Panduan Formulir
• Luar Biasa : New England Mutiny bekerja dengan sangat baik dengan 2.6 poin per game yang diperoleh dalam 5 pertandingan terakhir.
• Bagus : Santa Clarita Blue Heat berada di jalur yang sama dengan New England Mutiny dengan rata-rata 2.6 poin per game dalam 5 pertandingan terakhir.
• Cukup bagus : Coppermine United adalah tim dengan performa terbaik ke-3 dengan 4 menang dan 1 kalah dalam 5 pertandingan terakhir dengan rata-rata 2.4 poin per game.
• Performa rata-rata : Ada beberapa tim yang memiliki performa rata-rata baru-baru ini. Ini termasuk FC Buffalo, yang 3 menang, 1 seri, dan 1 kekalahan membawa mereka ke 2 poin per game yang mengecewakan sejauh musim ini.
• Tidak baik : Michigan Burn SC telah tampil di bawah standar dibandingkan dengan tim lain dengan 0 menang dalam 5 pertandingan terakhir. Ini membawa mereka ke rata-rata 0 poin per game menjadikannya salah satu tim dengan performa terburuk musim ini. Pada tingkat ini, mereka mungkin berisiko terdegradasi atau terlempar dari UWS.
• Sangat buruk : Performa New York Magic W secara statistik adalah yang terlemah di UWS. Mereka memiliki performa sangat buruk baru-baru ini dengan hanya 0 menang dalam 5 pertandingan terakhir. Poin rata-rata per game adalah 0 membuat mereka menjadi pemain terburuk. Mereka hanya mencetak mencetak 2 gol dan kebobolan 37 gol kebobolan!. Jika mereka terus seperti ini, kami tidak yakin apakah para penggemar dapat menonton pertandingan New York Magic W.
TABEL PERFORMA KANDANG (UWS)
# | Tim | PD | M | S | K | GM | GA | SG | P | 6 Terakhir | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 1 | 33 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Pass W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
12 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
16 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
18 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
20 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
32 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 75% |
34 | ![]() | Players SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 14 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
Tim Manakah yang Memiliki Performa Tuan Rumah Terbaik dan Tandang?
• New England Mutiny telah menjadi pemain terbaik di stadium kandang mereka dengan 0 kekalahan dan 6 kemenangan dalam 6 pertandingan terakhir di kandang. Poin rata-rata mereka per pertandingan adalah yang tertinggi di antara semua klub lain dengan 3.
• Santa Clarita Blue Heat telah menunjukkan penampilan yang luar biasa di stadium kandang mereka. Dengan 5 kemenangan, 1 seri, dan 0 kekalahan. Bentuk mereka membawa mereka ke tempat ke-2 di tabel kondisi tuan rumah UWS. Poin rata-rata per game keluar sebagai 2.67 yang hampir sama bagusnya dengan New England Mutiny.
• Performa New York Magic W di bawah standar di stadium kandang mereka. New York Magic W berhasil mendapatkan 0 kemenangan saja dalam 6 pertandingan terakhir yang dimainkan di kandang. Poin rata-rata mereka per game adalah 0 membuat mereka menjadi tim dengan performa terburuk ke-2 di UWS di kandang.
• Sangat menyedihkan. Penampilan Worcester Smiles CIR Club sangat buruk di kandang sendiri. Dengan 0 kemenangan, 0 seri, 4 kekalahan, dan hanya 0 poin per game dalam 6 pertandingan kandang terakhir mereka untuk ditunjukkan, Worcester Smiles CIR Club sama sekali tidak muncul di pertandingan kandang.
TABEL PERFORMA TANDANG (UWS)
# | Tim | PD | M | S | K | GM | GA | SG | P | 6 Terakhir | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Santa Clarita Blue Heat | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
5 | ![]() | Calgary Foothills WFC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | New Jersey Copa FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | FC Buffalo | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Steel City Sparks | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Back Mountain Torrent W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Elite 14 W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Indiana Union | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Michigan Hawks SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
17 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | New York Magic W | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 34 | -27 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Steel United New Jersey W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Coppermine United | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Firebirds W | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Flower City 1872 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Cap City Athletic 1847 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 25% |
28 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
30 | ![]() | New Jersey Alliance FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Nationals FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | FC Arizona Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Chicago Rush SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | FC Berlin | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Players SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
36 | ![]() | Cincinnati Sirens FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Indiana United FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
38 | ![]() | WC Lions W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Michigan Burn SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Pass W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Worcester Smiles CIR Club | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
Tim Manakah yang Memiliki Performa Tandang Terbaik dan Terburuk?
• Michigan Jaguars FC bermain luar biasa di pertandingan Tandang. Mereka berhasil mengantongi 5 kemenangan dalam 6 pertandingan terakhir mereka bermain di luar kandang. Michigan Jaguars FC memiliki penghitungan poin tertinggi dengan 15 yang membuat mereka menjadi pemain terbaik di laga tandang di UWS.
• Worcester Smiles CIR Club tampil mengecewakan di pertandingan tandang. Mereka tetap menjadi pemain terburuk dengan 0 kemenangan dalam 6 pertandingan terakhir dimainkan jauh dari stadium home mereka, yang cukup tidak menguntungkan bagi klub dan penggemar mereka.
Tabel Performa - Amerika Serikat
- Divisi 1
- Divisi 2
- Divisi 4
- Divisi 1
- Divisi 4
- Divisi 3
- Piala
- Divisi 4
- Divisi 2
- Divisi 3
- Divisi 1
- Piala
- Divisi 2
- Divisi 4
- Divisi 3
- Piala
- Piala
- Piala