Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - USA USL Championship
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - USL Championship
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | San Antonio FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Louisville City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Detroit City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Monterey Bay FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Tulsa Roughnecks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Loudoun United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | New Mexico United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Lexington SC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Indy Eleven | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Sacramento Republic FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | North Carolina FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Orange County SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Charleston Battery | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Las Vegas Lights FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | El Paso Locomotive FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Phoenix Rising FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Birmingham Legion FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Rhode Island FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Oakland Roots SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Miami FC II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
San Antonio FC
is currently the most in form team in the USL Championship. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Louisville City FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Detroit City FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Hartford Athletic
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Oakland Roots SC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Miami FC II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- USL Championship (USA) Form Table consists of 24 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the USL Championship is San Antonio FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the USL Championship is Miami FC II
Last 10 Form Table (USL Championship)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | San Antonio FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Louisville City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
3 | ![]() | Detroit City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Monterey Bay FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Tulsa Roughnecks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | Loudoun United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | New Mexico United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
8 | ![]() | Indy Eleven | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Sacramento Republic FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Lexington SC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
11 | ![]() | Las Vegas Lights FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Charleston Battery | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Orange County SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
15 | ![]() | North Carolina FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
16 | ![]() | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | El Paso Locomotive FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Phoenix Rising FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Birmingham Legion FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Rhode Island FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
23 | ![]() | Oakland Roots SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Miami FC II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For USL Championship
• During the last 10 games, San Antonio FC have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the USL Championship just based on the last 10 matches.
• Louisville City FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.33 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Detroit City FC, whose tally of 7 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 2 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.33 points per game. Can Detroit City FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 USL Championship games, Indy Eleven fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Indy Eleven is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 1 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses.
• Miami FC II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the USL Championship. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (USL Championship)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | San Antonio FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Louisville City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
3 | ![]() | Detroit City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Monterey Bay FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Tulsa Roughnecks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | Loudoun United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | New Mexico United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
8 | ![]() | Lexington SC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
9 | ![]() | Indy Eleven | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Sacramento Republic FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | North Carolina FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
13 | ![]() | Orange County SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Charleston Battery | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Las Vegas Lights FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | El Paso Locomotive FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Phoenix Rising FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Birmingham Legion FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Rhode Island FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
23 | ![]() | Oakland Roots SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Miami FC II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : San Antonio FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Louisville City FC is on the same track as San Antonio FC with an average of of 2.33 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Detroit City FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 2 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.33 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Indy Eleven, whose 1 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Oakland Roots SC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the USL Championship.
• Dangerously poor : Miami FC II's performance has statistically been the weakest in the USL Championship. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 2 goals and conceded 7! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Miami FC II play.
Home - Form Table (USL Championship)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | San Antonio FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | ![]() | Lexington SC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Sacramento Republic FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Orange County SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Louisville City FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | New Mexico United | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | ![]() | Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | ![]() | Charleston Battery | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Monterey Bay FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Tulsa Roughnecks FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Las Vegas Lights FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | El Paso Locomotive FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Detroit City FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | North Carolina FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Phoenix Rising FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Birmingham Legion FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Hartford Athletic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
18 | ![]() | Indy Eleven | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
19 | ![]() | Loudoun United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
20 | ![]() | Rhode Island FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
21 | ![]() | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
22 | ![]() | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Oakland Roots SC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Miami FC II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• San Antonio FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Toyota Field) with 0 losses and 2 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Lexington SC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 1 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the USL Championship home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2 which is nearly as good as San Antonio FC.
• Oakland Roots SC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Oakland Roots SC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in USL Championship at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Miami FC II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Miami FC II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (USL Championship)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Detroit City FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Loudoun United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Louisville City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | Indy Eleven | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | North Carolina FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | San Antonio FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | New Mexico United | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Monterey Bay FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
10 | ![]() | Tulsa Roughnecks FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
13 | ![]() | Birmingham Legion FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Lexington SC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Phoenix Rising FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Rhode Island FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Sacramento Republic FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
18 | ![]() | El Paso Locomotive FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
19 | ![]() | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Charleston Battery | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
21 | ![]() | Las Vegas Lights FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
22 | ![]() | Orange County SC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
23 | ![]() | Oakland Roots SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Miami FC II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Detroit City FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 2 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Detroit City FC have the highest points tally with 6 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the USL Championship.
• Miami FC II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff