* Time is in your local timezone (-07:00)
MLS Next Pro Table (USA) - 2026
Regular Season
- Conference - Quarter-finals
- Play-In Round
| Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | BTTS | xGF | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | Austin FC II | 28 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 54 | 21 | +33 | 63 |
| 2.25 | 54% | 46% | 1.65 | 79% | 43% | 2.68 | ||
| 2 |  | Crown Legacy | 28 | 15 | 8 | 5 | 67 | 39 | +28 | 53 |
| 1.89 | 29% | 61% | 1.65 | 93% | 75% | 3.79 | ||
| 3 |  | Chattanooga FC | 28 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 56 | 39 | +17 | 52 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 64% | 1.73 | 79% | 61% | 3.39 | ||
| 4 |  | Portland Timbers II | 28 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 37 | 29 | +8 | 52 |
| 1.86 | 52% | 41% | 1.67 | 66% | 48% | 2.34 | ||
| 5 |  | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 28 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 58 | 36 | +22 | 49 |
| 1.75 | 28% | 69% | 1.67 | 90% | 66% | 3.41 | ||
| 6 |  | Houston Dynamo FC II | 28 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 53 | 33 | +20 | 48 |
| 1.71 | 32% | 57% | 1.69 | 93% | 61% | 3.07 | ||
| 7 |  | Atlanta United FC II | 28 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 62 | 46 | +16 | 47 |
| 1.68 | 14% | 66% | 1.82 | 90% | 69% | 3.76 | ||
| 8 |  | New York Red Bulls II | 28 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 58 | 48 | +10 | 44 |
| 1.57 | 10% | 79% | 1.84 | 100% | 86% | 3.79 | ||
| 9 |  | Connecticut United | 28 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 59 | 52 | +7 | 44 |
| 1.57 | 14% | 76% | 1.65 | 90% | 79% | 3.86 | ||
| 10 |  | New York City FC II | 28 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 44 | +6 | 44 |
| 1.57 | 25% | 61% | 1.55 | 86% | 64% | 3.36 | ||
| 11 |  | New England Revolution II | 28 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 47 | 42 | +5 | 44 |
| 1.57 | 24% | 72% | 1.77 | 83% | 72% | 3.17 | ||
| 12 |  | Columbus Crew II | 28 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 49 | 43 | +6 | 43 |
| 1.54 | 17% | 72% | 1.56 | 86% | 66% | 3.28 | ||
| 13 |  | Minnesota United FC II | 28 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 43 | 39 | +4 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 24% | 55% | 1.74 | 76% | 52% | 3.00 | ||
| 14 |  | Huntsville City FC | 28 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 49 | 47 | +2 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 31% | 59% | 1.37 | 83% | 69% | 3.45 | ||
| 15 |  | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 28 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 50 | 48 | +2 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 14% | 75% | 1.78 | 86% | 71% | 3.50 | ||
| 16 |  | Orlando City II | 28 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 56 | 55 | +1 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 4% | 82% | 1.63 | 93% | 79% | 3.96 | ||
| 17 |  | Philadelphia Union II | 28 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 41 |
| 1.46 | 18% | 57% | 1.34 | 71% | 54% | 2.75 | ||
| 18 |  | St. Louis City SC II | 28 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 42 | 40 | +2 | 40 |
| 1.43 | 28% | 59% | 1.62 | 93% | 55% | 2.90 | ||
| 19 |  | San Jose Earthquakes II | 28 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 51 | 36 | +15 | 39 |
| 1.39 | 17% | 62% | 1.65 | 79% | 59% | 3.28 | ||
| 20 |  | Tacoma Defiance | 28 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 40 | 44 | -4 | 38 |
| 1.36 | 21% | 52% | 1.42 | 76% | 66% | 3.17 | ||
| 21 |  | Toronto FC II USL | 28 | 11 | 4 | 13 | 48 | 56 | -8 | 37 |
| 1.32 | 18% | 68% | 1.34 | 86% | 79% | 3.71 | ||
| 22 |  | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 28 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 35 |
| 1.25 | 18% | 64% | 1.70 | 89% | 82% | 3.50 | ||
| 23 |  | North Texas SC | 28 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 34 |
| 1.21 | 18% | 57% | 1.61 | 79% | 54% | 2.96 | ||
| 24 |  | Real Monarchs SLC | 28 | 8 | 5 | 15 | 38 | 55 | -17 | 29 |
| 1.04 | 14% | 54% | 1.46 | 86% | 75% | 3.32 | ||
| 25 |  | Carolina Core FC | 28 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 40 | 53 | -13 | 26 |
| 0.93 | 21% | 71% | 1.47 | 86% | 64% | 3.32 | ||
| 26 |  | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 28 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 61 | -21 | 25 |
| 0.89 | 11% | 71% | 1.62 | 86% | 68% | 3.61 | ||
| 27 |  | Sporting Kansas City II | 28 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 36 | 75 | -39 | 22 |
| 0.79 | 4% | 68% | 1.48 | 89% | 82% | 3.96 | ||
| 28 |  | Colorado Rapids II | 28 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 27 | 53 | -26 | 18 |
| 0.64 | 11% | 57% | 1.44 | 86% | 54% | 2.86 | ||
| 29 |  | FC Cincinnati II | 28 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 32 | 62 | -30 | 18 |
| 0.64 | 11% | 61% | 1.32 | 82% | 71% | 3.36 | ||
| 30 |  | Inter Miami II | 28 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 74 | -44 | 14 |
| 0.50 | 4% | 64% | 1.48 | 86% | 64% | 3.71 |
- Play-off
Terminologies
PPG : Average points picked up per match across the competition.
Higher numbers indicate a stronger team.
CS : Table of teams with the highest number of matches where they conceded 0 goals. Stats are taken from League runs only.
* Team must have played a minimum of 7 matches before they qualify for this CS table.
BTTS : List of teams with the highest number of matches where both teams scored. Stats from team's Domestic League runs only.
* Team must have played a minimum of 7 matches before they qualify for this BTTS table.
FTS : Matches where this team failed to score.
| Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | BTTS | xGF | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Austin FC II | 28 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 54 | 21 | +33 | 63 |
| 2.25 | 54% | 46% | 1.65 | 79% | 43% | 2.68 | ||
| 2 | | Portland Timbers II | 29 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 39 | 29 | +10 | 55 |
| 1.90 | 52% | 41% | 1.67 | 66% | 48% | 2.34 | ||
| 3 | | Crown Legacy | 28 | 15 | 8 | 5 | 67 | 39 | +28 | 53 |
| 1.89 | 29% | 61% | 1.65 | 93% | 75% | 3.79 | ||
| 4 | | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 29 | 15 | 7 | 7 | 61 | 38 | +23 | 52 |
| 1.79 | 28% | 69% | 1.67 | 90% | 66% | 3.41 | ||
| 5 | | Chattanooga FC | 28 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 56 | 39 | +17 | 52 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 64% | 1.73 | 79% | 61% | 3.39 | ||
| 6 | | Houston Dynamo FC II | 28 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 53 | 33 | +20 | 48 |
| 1.71 | 32% | 57% | 1.69 | 93% | 61% | 3.07 | ||
| 7 | | Atlanta United FC II | 29 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 62 | 47 | +15 | 47 |
| 1.62 | 14% | 66% | 1.82 | 90% | 69% | 3.76 | ||
| 8 | | New York Red Bulls II | 29 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 61 | 49 | +12 | 47 |
| 1.62 | 10% | 79% | 1.84 | 100% | 86% | 3.79 | ||
| 9 | | Connecticut United | 29 | 15 | 2 | 12 | 60 | 52 | +8 | 47 |
| 1.62 | 14% | 76% | 1.65 | 90% | 79% | 3.86 | ||
| 10 | | Columbus Crew II | 29 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 51 | 44 | +7 | 46 |
| 1.59 | 17% | 72% | 1.56 | 86% | 66% | 3.28 | ||
| 11 | | New York City FC II | 28 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 44 | +6 | 44 |
| 1.57 | 25% | 61% | 1.55 | 86% | 64% | 3.36 | ||
| 12 | | New England Revolution II | 29 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 48 | 44 | +4 | 44 |
| 1.52 | 24% | 72% | 1.77 | 83% | 72% | 3.17 | ||
| 13 | | Minnesota United FC II | 29 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 45 | 42 | +3 | 42 |
| 1.45 | 24% | 55% | 1.74 | 76% | 52% | 3.00 | ||
| 14 | | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 28 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 50 | 48 | +2 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 14% | 75% | 1.78 | 86% | 71% | 3.50 | ||
| 15 | | Orlando City II | 28 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 56 | 55 | +1 | 42 |
| 1.50 | 4% | 82% | 1.63 | 93% | 79% | 3.96 | ||
| 16 | | Huntsville City FC | 29 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 42 |
| 1.45 | 31% | 59% | 1.37 | 83% | 69% | 3.45 | ||
| 17 | | Philadelphia Union II | 28 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 41 |
| 1.46 | 18% | 57% | 1.34 | 71% | 54% | 2.75 | ||
| 18 | | San Jose Earthquakes II | 29 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 55 | 40 | +15 | 40 |
| 1.38 | 17% | 62% | 1.65 | 79% | 59% | 3.28 | ||
| 19 | | St. Louis City SC II | 29 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 40 |
| 1.38 | 28% | 59% | 1.62 | 93% | 55% | 2.90 | ||
| 20 | | Tacoma Defiance | 29 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 44 | 48 | -4 | 39 |
| 1.34 | 21% | 52% | 1.42 | 76% | 66% | 3.17 | ||
| 21 | | Toronto FC II USL | 28 | 11 | 4 | 13 | 48 | 56 | -8 | 37 | 1.32 | 18% | 68% | 1.34 | 86% | 79% | 3.71 | |||
| 22 | | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 28 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 35 |
| 1.25 | 18% | 64% | 1.70 | 89% | 82% | 3.50 | ||
| 23 | | North Texas SC | 28 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 34 |
| 1.21 | 18% | 57% | 1.61 | 79% | 54% | 2.96 | ||
| 24 | | Real Monarchs SLC | 28 | 8 | 5 | 15 | 38 | 55 | -17 | 29 |
| 1.04 | 14% | 54% | 1.46 | 86% | 75% | 3.32 | ||
| 25 | | Carolina Core FC | 28 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 40 | 53 | -13 | 26 |
| 0.93 | 21% | 71% | 1.47 | 86% | 64% | 3.32 | ||
| 26 | | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 28 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 61 | -21 | 25 |
| 0.89 | 11% | 71% | 1.62 | 86% | 68% | 3.61 | ||
| 27 | | Sporting Kansas City II | 28 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 36 | 75 | -39 | 22 |
| 0.79 | 4% | 68% | 1.48 | 89% | 82% | 3.96 | ||
| 28 | | Colorado Rapids II | 28 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 27 | 53 | -26 | 18 |
| 0.64 | 11% | 57% | 1.44 | 86% | 54% | 2.86 | ||
| 29 | | FC Cincinnati II | 28 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 32 | 62 | -30 | 18 |
| 0.64 | 11% | 61% | 1.32 | 82% | 71% | 3.36 | ||
| 30 | | Inter Miami II | 28 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 74 | -44 | 14 |
| 0.50 | 4% | 64% | 1.48 | 86% | 64% | 3.71 |
MLS Next Pro Table Analysis
The bottom team (SAB Spartans SC) need 8 more points to escape automatic relegation.
The point gap between Austin FC II at the top and Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II at the bottom is 37 points.
Difference between Austin FC II at 1st and Portland Timbers II at 2nd is 3 points.
USA - MLS Next Pro Detailed Stats
MLS Next Pro Stats (USA) - 2026
26.9min/Goal
(1423 Goals in 426 matches)
+32% Home ATK Advantage
(Scores 32% more goals than usual)
41% Clean Sheets
(174 times out of 426 matches)
24% Home DEF Advantage
(Concedes 24% less goals than usual)
63% Both Teams Scored
(270 times out of 426 matches)
92% - High Risk
(Scoreline is very unpredictable)
*Goal Heatmap shows when the goals happen in this league.
Red = High scoring. Yellow = Average. Green = Low Scoring
Home Win
Draw
Away Win
Over +
Under -
Frequent Total Goals - Full-Time
Frequent Scorelines - Full-Time
Half Time Stats (1st Half / 2nd Half)
FHG - Over X
2HG - Over X
* FHG = First Half Goals in USA - MLS Next Pro
* 2HG = Second Half Goals in USA - MLS Next Pro
Frequent Total Goals - Half-Time
Frequent Scorelines - Half-Time
2026 Club Stats
Goals Scored
Goals Conceded
* MLS Next Pro Club Stats from 2026 season
Clean Sheets
* MLS Next Pro Club Stats from 2026 season