Vormtabel - VS UWS

Competitie
Goals
Meer/Minder Dan
- Stats in deze Categorie :
- Thuis & Uit Tabellen -
- Vormtabel -
- Thuisvoordeel -
- Voorspellingen -
- Toeschouwersaantal -
- Speler Stats -
- Gelijke Spelen -
- Salarissen
Vormtabel - UWS
| # | Ploeg | WG | W | G | V | DV | DT | DS | Ptn | Laatste 6 | PPW | CS | FTS | BTS | Meer dan 2.5 | Volgende Wedstrijd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 4 | 23 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% | |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
LAATSTE 5 VORMTABEL (UWS)
| # | Ploeg | WG | W | G | V | DV | DT | DS | Ptn | Last 5 | PPW | CS | FTS | BTS | Meer dan 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 3 | 26 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Troy City W | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Welke Ploegen zijn goed bezig gebaseerd op hun vorm in de Laatste 5 wedstrijden? - Vormgids
• Excellent: Flint City AFC doet het uitstekend met gemiddeld 3 punten per wedstrijd uit hun laatste 5 wedstrijden.
• Heel Goed: Michigan Jaguars FC volgt van kortbij op Flint City AFC met gemiddeld 2.6 punten per wedstrijd uit de laatste 5.
• Redelijk Goed: United City II staat 3e qua vorm op dit moment met 4 zeges en 0 nederlagen uit hun laatste 5, een gemiddelde van 3 punten per wedstrijd.
• Gemiddeld: Sommige ploegen zitten gewoon in de middenmoot, zo ook FC Pontiac Women 3 zeges, 0 gelijke spelen en 2 nederlagen resulteren in een matige 1.8 punten per wedstrijd dit seizoen.
• Ondermaats: Pinnacle Women speelt best ondermaats met amper 0 zeges in hun laatste 5 wedstrijden. Dit brengt hun gemiddeld aantal punten per wedstrijd op 0, en dus een van de zwakste ploegen dit seizoen. Als er niet gauw verbetering komt riskeren ze degradatie uit de UWS.
• Zwaar Ondermaats: San Fernando Valley Women is statistisch gezien de slechtste ploeg in de UWS. Recent waren ze zwaar ondermaats met 0 zeges in de laatste 5. Met gemiddeld 0 punten per wedstrijd, maakt het hun de slechtste leerling van de klas. Amper 4 doelpunten werden gescoord en ondertussen kregen ze er 22 tegen!. Het moet echt pijn doen aan de ogen van de fans van San Fernando Valley Women om hun aan het werk te zien.
THUISVORM TABEL (UWS)
| # | Ploeg | WG | W | G | V | DV | DT | DS | Ptn | Laatste 6 | PPW | CS | FTS | BTS | Meer dan 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 28 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Welke Ploegen hebben de Beste en de Slechtste Thuisvorm?
• Michigan Jaguars FC maakt een oninneembare burcht van hun eigen met 0 nederlagen en 2 zeges in hun laatste 6 thuiswedstrijden. Met gemiddeld 3 punten per thuiswedstrijd zijn ze de beste leerling van de klas.
• United City II speelt op dit moment fenomenaal in hun. Met 2 zeges, 0 gelijke spelen, en 0 nederlagen. Deze prestatie in eigen huis brengt hun op plaats 2e in de vormtabel in de UWS qua thuiswedstrijden. Met een gemiddelde van 3 punten per wedstrijden doen ze net iets minder goed als Michigan Jaguars FC.
• Lansing City Womenheeft op dit moment moeite in het eigen . Lansing City Women luktte slechts 0 zeges in de laatste 6 thuiswedstrijden in het . Met gemiddeld 0 punten per wedstrijd zijn ze de op 1 na slechtste thuisploeg in de UWS.
• Gewoon niet om aan te zien. Maine Mystics Women hun thuiswedstrijden zijn ronduit rampzalig de laatste tijd. Met 0 zeges, 0 puntendelingen en 3 nederlagen en dus amper 0 punten per wedstrijd in de laatste 6 thuiswedstrijden is Maine Mystics Women veruit de slechtste thuisploeg van de competitie.
UITVORM TABEL (UWS)
| # | Ploeg | WG | W | G | V | DV | DT | DS | Ptn | Laatste 6 | PPW | CS | FTS | BTS | Meer dan 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | United City II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Troy City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Welke Ploegen hebben de Beste en Slechtste Vorm in Uitwedstrijden?
• Flint City AFC is ongeloofelijk sterk bezig in hun uitwedstrijden. Met maar liefst 4 zeges in hun laatste 6 uitwedstrijden scoort Flint City AFC het hoogste aantal 12 in uitwedstrijden in de UWS.
• Lancaster Women doet het teleurstellend in hun uitwedstrijden. Met amper 0 zeges in de laatste 6 uitwedstrijden blijven ze de slechtste uitploeg. Dit moet een enorme teleurstelling zijn voor de hele club en hun fans.
Vormtabel - VS
- Divisie 1
- Divisie 2
- Divisie 4
- Divisie 1
- Divisie 4
- Divisie 3
- Beker
- Divisie 4
- Divisie 2
- Divisie 3
- Divisie 1
- Beker
- Divisie 2
- Divisie 4
- Divisie 3
- Beker
- Beker
- Beker
- Beker
































