Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA USL League Two
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - USL League Two
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 5 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 6 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 7 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 8 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Project 51O | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 12 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 18 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 19 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 24 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 41 | ![]() | Academica SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 17% | N/A |
| 44 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 46 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | N/A |
| 47 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 48 | ![]() | Weston FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 50% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 67% | N/A |
Bangers FC
is currently the most in form team in the USL League Two. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Minneapolis City SC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Colorado Storm
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Weston FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Toledo Villa FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- USL League Two (USA) Form Table consists of 158 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the USL League Two is Bangers FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the USL League Two is Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
Last 10 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Dothan United | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 14 | 19 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 11 | 20 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Peoria City | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 10 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 70% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Project 51O | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 22 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 24 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 28 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 27 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Stars FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 31 | -22 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | River Light FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 34 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Academica SC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 26 | -13 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| 41 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 24 | -14 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 43 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 44 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 32 | -11 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 60% | 30% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 35 | -22 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 50 | ![]() | Weston FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 26 | -21 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 60% | 40% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For USL League Two
• During the last 10 games, Dothan United have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the USL League Two just based on the last 10 matches.
• Colorado Storm is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Ballard FC, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Ballard FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 USL League Two games, Ventura County Fusion SC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Ventura County Fusion SC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 34 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 38 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 40 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 20% |
| 43 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Bangers FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Snohomish United is on the same track as Bangers FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Dothan United is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes The Villages FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Dothan United | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
| 6 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | River Light FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Project 51O | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Peoria City | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Weston FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 | ![]() | Academica SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 45 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Bangers FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Dothan United has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the USL League Two home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Bangers FC.
Away Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Project 51O | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Dothan United | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | River Light FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Academica SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 29 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 38 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Stars FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 44 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 50 | ![]() | Weston FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• San Francisco Glens SC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. San Francisco Glens SC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the USL League Two.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































