- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- USL League Two
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA USL League Two
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - USL League Two
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 83% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Project 51O | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 10 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 11 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | Texoma FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | McKinney Chupacabras FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Weston FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 26 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 40 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 41 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 47 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Snohomish United
is currently the most in form team in the USL League Two. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Minneapolis City SC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Colorado Storm
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
AMSG FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Flatirons Rush Pro Development
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- USL League Two (USA) Form Table consists of 158 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the USL League Two is Snohomish United
- The team with the worst form currently in the USL League Two is Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
Last 10 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 24 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 88% |
| 2 | ![]() | Peoria City | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 63% |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 19 |
| 2.71 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 71% |
| 4 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 8 | 22 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 24 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 11% | 22% | 56% |
| 6 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Dothan United | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 13% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Project 51O | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.44 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 13% | 50% | 63% |
| 12 | ![]() | McKinney Chupacabras FC | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 20 |
| 2.22 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 13% | 25% | 75% | 63% |
| 14 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Stars FC | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 57% |
| 16 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 38% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Texoma FC | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 13% | 25% | 63% | 75% |
| 19 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 15 |
| 1.67 | 22% | 11% | 78% | 78% |
| 21 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 13% | 25% | 63% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 22% | 22% | 56% | 56% |
| 24 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 57% |
| 25 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.38 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 22% | 56% | 56% |
| 27 | ![]() | River Light FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 86% |
| 28 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 71% |
| 29 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Weston FC | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 50% | 38% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 13% | 38% | 63% | 63% |
| 32 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.22 | 11% | 33% | 56% | 44% |
| 33 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.11 | 33% | 44% | 33% | 44% |
| 34 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 22% | 78% | 56% |
| 35 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 13% | 75% | 88% |
| 36 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 10 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 8 |
| 0.89 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 78% |
| 39 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 31 | -11 | 8 |
| 0.89 | 0% | 11% | 89% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 13% | 88% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Academica SC | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 22% | 78% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 30 | -19 | 5 |
| 0.56 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 89% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.56 | 11% | 33% | 56% | 89% |
| 46 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.44 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 88% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 27 | -18 | 1 |
| 0.11 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 24 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 88% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 31 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For USL League Two
• During the last 10 games, Snohomish United have been doing really well with 2.7 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the USL League Two just based on the last 10 matches.
• San Francisco City FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Ballard FC, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Ballard FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 USL League Two games, McKinney Chupacabras FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. McKinney Chupacabras FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 14 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Texoma FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | McKinney Chupacabras FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Snohomish United is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : San Francisco City FC is on the same track as Snohomish United with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Peoria City is the 3rd most well performing team with 5 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 3 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Ballard FC, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Texoma FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | McKinney Chupacabras FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Stars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Project 51O | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 23 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | River Light FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Weston FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 42 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 19 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Snohomish United has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Minneapolis City SC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the USL League Two home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Snohomish United.
Away Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | McKinney Chupacabras FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 18 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 19 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Dothan United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 31 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Texoma FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 39 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 46 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Project 51O is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Project 51O have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the USL League Two.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































