- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- USL League Two
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA USL League Two
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - USL League Two
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Project 51O | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 11 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 13 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Weston FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 24 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 26 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 40 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 41 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 47 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
Minneapolis City SC
is currently the most in form team in the USL League Two. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Snohomish United
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Little Rock Rangers SC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
AMSG FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Flatirons Rush Pro Development
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- USL League Two (USA) Form Table consists of 158 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the USL League Two is Minneapolis City SC
- The team with the worst form currently in the USL League Two is Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
Last 10 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 24 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 88% |
| 2 | ![]() | Peoria City | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 63% |
| 3 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 19 |
| 2.71 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 43% |
| 4 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 19 |
| 2.71 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 71% |
| 5 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 24 |
| 2.67 | 44% | 11% | 44% | 78% |
| 6 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 24 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 11% | 22% | 56% |
| 7 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Dothan United | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 13% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Project 51O | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.44 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 13% | 50% | 63% |
| 13 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 13% | 25% | 75% | 63% |
| 14 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Stars FC | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 57% |
| 16 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 38% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 13% | 25% | 63% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 15 |
| 1.67 | 22% | 11% | 78% | 78% |
| 20 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 13% | 25% | 63% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 22% | 22% | 56% | 56% |
| 23 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 57% |
| 24 | ![]() | Weston FC | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 57% |
| 25 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.38 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 27 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 22% | 56% | 56% |
| 28 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 71% |
| 29 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 13% | 38% | 63% | 63% |
| 31 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.22 | 11% | 33% | 56% | 44% |
| 32 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.13 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.13 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.11 | 33% | 44% | 33% | 44% |
| 35 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 13% | 75% | 88% |
| 36 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 10 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 8 |
| 0.89 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 78% |
| 39 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 31 | -11 | 8 |
| 0.89 | 0% | 11% | 89% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 13% | 88% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Academica SC | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 22% | 78% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 27 | -16 | 5 |
| 0.63 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 88% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.56 | 11% | 33% | 56% | 89% |
| 46 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.44 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 8 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 88% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 27 | -18 | 1 |
| 0.11 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 86% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 31 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For USL League Two
• During the last 10 games, San Francisco City FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the USL League Two just based on the last 10 matches.
• Ballard FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Minneapolis City SC, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 3 points per game. Can Minneapolis City SC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 USL League Two games, Colorado Storm fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Colorado Storm is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Snohomish United is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : San Francisco City FC is on the same track as Snohomish United with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Peoria City is the 3rd most well performing team with 5 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 3 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Fort Lauderdale United FC, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Stars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Project 51O | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 23 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | River Light FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Weston FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 42 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 19 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Minneapolis City SC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Ballard FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the USL League Two home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Minneapolis City SC.
Away Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 15 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Dothan United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Weston FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | Atlético Unión | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | River Light FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 39 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 46 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 18 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Project 51O is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Project 51O have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the USL League Two.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































