- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- WPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA WPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - WPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 22 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 4 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 5 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 9 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 10 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 13 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 14 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 33% | |
| 16 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 17% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 18 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 83% | 67% | 17% | 17% | N/A |
| 20 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 21 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | SUSA FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 17% | |
| 26 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 28 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 31 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 83% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 39 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 41 | ![]() | District Elite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 42 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 43 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 44 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 45 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 46 | ![]() | Kensington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 47 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 48 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 49 | ![]() | Yuba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
Portland Thorns FC II
is currently the most in form team in the WPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Arlington Soccer
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Minnesota Thunder
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
The Futbol Collective
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Yuba
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
KICS Football Club
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- WPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 143 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the WPSL is Portland Thorns FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the WPSL is KICS Football Club
Last 10 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 63% | 13% | 38% | 88% |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 13 | 27 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 5 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 34 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 90% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 11 | 25 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 9 | ![]() | Davis FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 4 | 29 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 23 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 13 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 70% | 50% | 20% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 8 | 17 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 50% | 30% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 50% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.57 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 57% |
| 21 | ![]() | SUSA FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 70% | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 26 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% |
| 28 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 32 | -18 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 60% | 20% | 30% |
| 30 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 31 | 20 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 34 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 29 | -12 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 27 | -14 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 14% |
| 37 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 70% |
| 38 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 27 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 40 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 12 | 33 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | District Elite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Kensington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Yuba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For WPSL
• During the last 10 games, Decatur FC have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the WPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Minnesota Thunder is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Beach Futbol Club, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Beach Futbol Club improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 WPSL games, Arlington Soccer fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Arlington Soccer is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 18 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 26 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | SUSA FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 34 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 37 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | District Elite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Kensington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Yuba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Decatur FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Portland Thorns FC II is on the same track as Decatur FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Arlington Soccer is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes 865 Alliance Women, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | SUSA FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 100% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | ![]() | District Elite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Kensington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Yuba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 46 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Portland Thorns FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Arlington Soccer has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the WPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Portland Thorns FC II.
Away Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 2 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 21 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | SUSA FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | District Elite | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Kensington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Yuba | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• St. Croix SC Women is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 2 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. St. Croix SC Women have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the WPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































