- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- WPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA WPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - WPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 4 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 5 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 8 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 9 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 67% | N/A |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 13 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 18 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 17% | N/A |
| 19 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 20 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 50% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 17% | |
| 26 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 28 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 25 | -13 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
| 31 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 34 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | Erie FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 17% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 40 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 83% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 41 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 44 | ![]() | District Elite | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 48 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 49 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
Portland Thorns FC II
is currently the most in form team in the WPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Arlington Soccer
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Minnesota Thunder
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Glacier
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Inter CT FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
KICS Football Club
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- WPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 147 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the WPSL is Portland Thorns FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the WPSL is KICS Football Club
Last 10 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 5 | 34 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 13 | 27 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 5 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 41 | 7 | 34 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 90% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 36 | 12 | 24 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 4 | 29 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 12 | 23 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 80% | 40% | 10% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 70% | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 33 | -9 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 25 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Davis FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.22 | 44% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 26 | -9 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
| 32 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 32 | -18 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 36 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 25 | 22 | 3 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 39 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 22% | 44% | 44% | 22% |
| 40 | ![]() | Erie FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 27 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 43 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | District Elite | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 12 | 33 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Last 10 Form Guide For WPSL
• During the last 10 games, Arlington Soccer have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the WPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Decatur FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.8 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Minnesota Thunder, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Minnesota Thunder improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 WPSL games, Salvo SC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Salvo SC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 13 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 16 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 34 | ![]() | Erie FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 24 | -14 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 37 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 38 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 43 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | District Elite | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Decatur FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Portland Thorns FC II is on the same track as Decatur FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Arlington Soccer is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes 865 Alliance Women, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Davis FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 34 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | District Elite | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Erie FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Kensington | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 46 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Yuba | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Portland Thorns FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Arlington Soccer has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the WPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Portland Thorns FC II.
Away Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 2 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 23 | -13 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Erie FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Davis FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 21 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 22 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Yuba | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 | ![]() | Kensington | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | District Elite | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Austin Rise FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Austin Rise FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the WPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































