- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- WPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA WPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - WPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 4 | 22 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 6 | 29 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 4 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 5 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 8 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 9 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 33% | 0% | 50% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 14 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 20 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 24 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | |
| 30 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 100% | N/A |
| 31 | ![]() | Fever Women | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Erie FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | Yuba | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 17% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% | N/A |
| 40 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 22 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 42 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Kensington | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Glacier | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 49 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 25 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 83% | N/A |
Portland Thorns FC II
is currently the most in form team in the WPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Milwaukee Torrent FC Women
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
California Storm FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Hattiesburg FC Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Prestige II W
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Inter CT FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- WPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 149 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the WPSL is Portland Thorns FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the WPSL is Inter CT FC
Last 10 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 4 | 31 | 30 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 34 | 3 | 31 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 63% | 13% | 38% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 6 | 24 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 70% | 10% | 20% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 5 | 28 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 52 | 12 | 40 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 34 | 10 | 24 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 33 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 13 | 23 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 20% | 20% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 12 | 13 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 9 | 28 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 90% |
| 16 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 17 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 8 | 22 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 40% | 10% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 25 | -10 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 27 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 25 | 21 | 4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 50% | 30% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Davis FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 60% | 20% | 10% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fever Women | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
| 37 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.71 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 31 | -13 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Erie FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 35 | -26 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 35 | -27 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 25 | -18 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 30% | 40% |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 30 | -19 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 36 | -24 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 70% |
| 45 | ![]() | Yuba | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 38% |
| 46 | ![]() | Kensington | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 28 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 48 | ![]() | Glacier | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.29 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 71% |
| 49 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 25 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 83% |
Last 10 Form Guide For WPSL
• During the last 10 games, Portland Thorns FC II have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the WPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Minnesota Thunder is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are California Storm FC, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can California Storm FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 WPSL games, Little Rock Rangers fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Little Rock Rangers is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 6 | 23 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 4 | 17 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 27 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Fever Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 31 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 34 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 37 | ![]() | Erie FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 20 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Kensington | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 42 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 43 | ![]() | Glacier | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 47 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 19 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 23 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Portland Thorns FC II is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Milwaukee Torrent FC Women is on the same track as Portland Thorns FC II with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : California Storm FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes St. Croix SC Women, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Fever Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Glacier | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Yuba | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 37 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 41 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 43 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Kensington | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Erie FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 18 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• California Storm FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the WPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women.
Away Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Erie FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Yuba | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fever Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Kensington | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 40 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 42 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 43 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 44 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 45 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Glacier | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
| 48 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Little Rock Rangers is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Little Rock Rangers have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the WPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































