- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- WPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA WPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - WPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 67% | N/A |
| 3 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
| 4 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 17% | N/A |
| 6 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 3 | 25 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 7 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 6 | 19 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 8 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 13 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 18 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 19 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 20 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 33% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 67% | 67% | 17% | 17% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 33% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | N/A |
| 28 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% | N/A |
| 31 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Erie FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 39 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 25 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 40 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | N/A |
| 42 | ![]() | Yuba | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 50% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 44 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | N/A |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | District Elite | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 47 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 48 | ![]() | Fever Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 49 | ![]() | Glacier | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Portland Thorns FC II
is currently the most in form team in the WPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
California Storm FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Arlington Soccer
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Fever Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Glacier
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Inter CT FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- WPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 147 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the WPSL is Portland Thorns FC II
- The team with the worst form currently in the WPSL is Inter CT FC
Last 10 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 5 | 36 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 9 | 17 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 12 | 18 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 49 | 6 | 43 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 8 | 17 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 41 | 11 | 30 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 70% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 80% | 30% | 10% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 36 | 11 | 25 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 4 | 30 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 12 | 17 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | Davis FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 24 | -6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 30 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 31 | -10 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 34 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 36 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 26 | -13 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 25 | 22 | 3 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 39 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 20% |
| 40 | ![]() | Erie FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 32 | -14 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 43 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Yuba | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 29 | -19 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 47 | ![]() | District Elite | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fever Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Glacier | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For WPSL
• During the last 10 games, Arlington Soccer have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the WPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Decatur FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.6 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are 865 Alliance Women, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can 865 Alliance Women improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 WPSL games, Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| 8 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 25 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 26 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 80% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Erie FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 37 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 39 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 40% |
| 41 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Kensington | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 43 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | District Elite | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fever Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Glacier | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Arlington Soccer is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Portland Thorns FC II is on the same track as Arlington Soccer with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : California Storm FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Merrimack Valley Hawks FC, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 26 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 75% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 36 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | District Elite | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Erie FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fever Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Glacier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Kensington | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Yuba | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Middletown Sporting CT has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Portland Thorns FC II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the WPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Middletown Sporting CT.
Away Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 7 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Erie FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 23 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Davis FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Brooklyn City F.C. | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 34 | ![]() | Yuba | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Kensington | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 39 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC Women | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | District Elite | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fever Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Glacier | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Austin Rise FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Austin Rise FC have the highest points tally with 13 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the WPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































