- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- WPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA WPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - WPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 25 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Kansas City Current II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Georgia Impact | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | PA Classics | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 16 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 7 | 18 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Pensacola FC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 8 | 22 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Lou Fusz Athletic | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Miss Kick FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Love City | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Columbus Eagles FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 50% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | North Carolina II Women | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 83% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Spokane SC Shadow Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 50% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 27 | -25 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 23 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 67% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 27 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 83% | - |
California Storm FC
is currently the most in form team in the WPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Arlington Soccer
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Portland Thorns FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Prestige II W
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Inter CT FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- WPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 149 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the WPSL is California Storm FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the WPSL is Inter CT FC
Last 10 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 3 | 39 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | PA Classics | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 90% |
| 5 | ![]() | Georgia Impact | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 22 |
| 2.44 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 78% |
| 7 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Kansas City Current II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Pensacola FC Women | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 8 | 52 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 90% |
| 10 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 4 | 28 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lou Fusz Athletic | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 20 |
| 2.22 | 56% | 0% | 44% | 44% |
| 12 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 20 |
| 2.22 | 44% | 0% | 56% | 78% |
| 13 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 43 | 10 | 33 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 90% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 8 | 24 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 63% |
| 15 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Miss Kick FC | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 19 |
| 2.11 | 33% | 11% | 56% | 56% |
| 17 | ![]() | North Carolina II Women | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 19 |
| 2.11 | 44% | 11% | 44% | 89% |
| 18 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 19 |
| 2.11 | 44% | 11% | 44% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 88% |
| 20 | ![]() | Love City | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Columbus Eagles FC | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 9 | 20 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 44% | 11% | 44% | 78% |
| 22 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 52 | 18 | 34 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
| 24 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 26 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 63% |
| 27 | ![]() | Spokane SC Shadow Women | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 14 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.75 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 57% | 29% | 14% | 43% |
| 31 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 38% | 13% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 38% | 25% | 38% | 25% |
| 34 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 38% | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 90% |
| 37 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.25 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 75% |
| 38 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Davis FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 21 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 13% | 88% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 43% |
| 42 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 26 | -17 | 6 |
| 0.75 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 88% |
| 43 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 28 | -24 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 71% |
| 44 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.50 | 13% | 38% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 34 | -30 | 4 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 63% | 38% | 88% |
| 46 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 13% | 63% | 25% | 63% |
| 47 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 35 | -30 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.29 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 86% |
| 49 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 31 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Last 10 Form Guide For WPSL
• During the last 10 games, California Storm FC have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the WPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• New York Athletic Club Women is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.7 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are PA Classics, whose tally of 27 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 9 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.7 points per game. Can PA Classics improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 WPSL games, Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 2 | 27 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 23 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Columbus Eagles FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Georgia Impact | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Kansas City Current II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Miss Kick FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | PA Classics | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Pensacola FC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Lou Fusz Athletic | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Love City | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | North Carolina II Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 31 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Spokane SC Shadow Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 41 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 20 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 26 | -25 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Portland Thorns FC II is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : California Storm FC is on the same track as Portland Thorns FC II with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : FC Dallas Women is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Kansas City Current II, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Pensacola FC Women | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 49 | 3 | 46 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 22 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Georgia Impact | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | PA Classics | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Kansas City Current II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Miss Kick FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | North Carolina II Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Columbus Eagles FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Spokane SC Shadow Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Love City | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lou Fusz Athletic | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 38 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 39 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 44 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 45 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 48 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 18 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Pensacola FC Women has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• California Storm FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the WPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Pensacola FC Women.
Away Form Table (WPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | California Storm FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Kansas City Current II | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Arlington Soccer | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Pensacola FC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Lou Fusz Athletic | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | New York Athletic Club Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Love City | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chicago House AC Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 13 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | PA Classics | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Miss Kick FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Georgia Impact | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Columbus Eagles FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | North Carolina II Women | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush Women | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 25 | ![]() | San Francisco Nighthawks | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 27 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 29 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 30 | ![]() | St. Croix SC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 36 | ![]() | Spokane SC Shadow Women | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 25% |
| 40 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 41 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty Women | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 25% |
| 44 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | 865 Alliance Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 46 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 24 | -20 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Prestige II W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• California Storm FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 6 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. California Storm FC have the highest points tally with 18 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the WPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































