Tableau de la forme - Etats-Unis UWS

Competition
Buts
- Stats dans cette catégorie :
- Tableaux extérieur & domicile -
- Tableau de Forme -
- Avantage à domicile -
- Pronostics -
- Fréquentation -
- Stats de joueur -
- Egalités -
- Salaires
Tableau de la forme - UWS
| # | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | Match suivant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 14 | ![]() | Troy City W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 16 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 19 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 20 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 21 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 22 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 23 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 26 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 27 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 28 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 29 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 30 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 32 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
TABLEAU DES 5 DERNIÈRES FORMES (UWS)
| # | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Troy City W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Quelles sont les équipes qui s'en sortent bien d'après leur forme des 5 derniers matchs ? - Guide de forme
• Excellent : Midwest United FC se porte exceptionnellement bien avec 3 points par match lors des 5 derniers matchs.
• Très bien : SoCal FC est sur la même piste que Midwest United FC avec une moyenne de 3 de points par match sur les 5 derniers matchs
• Assez bien : Internacional Club Atletico est la 3ème équipe la plus performante avec 2 victoires et 1 défaites lors des 5 derniers matchs avec une moyenne de 2 points par match.
• Performance moyenne : il y a quelques équipes qui ont été très moyennes récemment. Cela inclut Grand Rapids Women, dont les 1 victoires, les 0 égalités et les 1 défaites les amènent à un nombre décevant de 1.5 points par match jusqu'à présent cette saison.
• forme mauvaise : Tulip City United Women a réalisé des performances inférieures à celles des autres équipes avec 0 victoires au cours des 5 derniers matchs. Cela les amène à une moyenne de points 0 par match, ce qui en fait l'une des équipes les moins performantes de la saison. À ce rythme, ils risquent d'être relégués ou d'être expulsés de la UWS.
• Dangereusement médiocre : les performances de San Fernando Valley Women ont statistiquement été les plus faibles de UWS. Ils ont été catastrophiques récemment avec seulement 0 lors des 5 derniers matchs. La moyenne de points par match s'avère être 0, ce qui en fait le pire joueur. Ils n'ont marqué que 2 et encaissé 11 !. S'ils continuent comme ça, nous ne savons pas si les fans pourront supporter de regarder San Fernando Valley Women jouer.
TABLEAU DE FORME A DOMICILE (UWS)
| # | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 8 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Troy City W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Quelles équipes ont les meilleurs et les pires formes à domicile ?
• Internacional Club Atletico a été la plus performante dans son avec à domicile avec 1 défaites et 2 victoires lors des 6 derniers matchs à domicile. Leur moyenne de points par match est la plus élevée parmi tous les autres clubs avec 2.
• SoCal FC a montré d'excellentes performances dans son stade . Avec 1 wins, 0 draw, et 0 losses. Leur forme les amène à la 2e place dans le tableau des formulaires à domicile UWS. Le nombre moyen de points par match est de 3, ce qui est presque aussi bon que Internacional Club Atletico.
• Les performances de San Fernando Valley Women ont été inférieures aux normes dans leur stade . San Fernando Valley Women a réussi à obtenir seulement 0 victoires lors des 6 derniers matchs disputés à domicile . Leur moyenne de points par match est de 0, ce qui en fait la deuxième équipe la moins performante de UWS à domicile.
• Lamentable, juste lamentable. Les performances de Tulip City United Women ont été terribles à domicile. Avec 0, 0 nuls, 2 défaites, et seulement les 0 points par match lors de leurs 6 derniers matchs à domicile, Tulip City United Women ne se présente tout simplement pas aux matchs à domicile.
TABLEAU DE FORME A L'EXTERIEUR (UWS)
| # | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | SoCal FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | ![]() | Chicago Inter Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flint City AFC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Grand Rapids Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Los Angeles Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | New England Mutiny | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Worcester Wanderers Women | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Internacional Club Atletico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Maine Footy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Baltimore Blast W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Baltimore Warriors W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Berber City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Connecticut Legends Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | ![]() | DeKalb County United FC Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pontiac Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Lancaster Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Maine Mystics Women | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Michigan Jaguars II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Michigan Legends FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Stars FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Midland Fusion Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | MSI Soccer W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Pinnacle Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Racing Power W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Rockford Raptors II Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Troy City W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | ![]() | United City II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Crystal Lake Force Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Lansing City Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | ![]() | San Fernando Valley Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Tulip City United Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Quelles équipes ont les meilleurs et les pires formes à l'extérieur ?
• Midwest United FC est sur une course incroyable en jouant lors de matchs à l'extérieur. Ils ont réussi à remporter 2 lors de leurs 6 derniers matchs joués à l'extérieur. Midwest United FC a le plus grand nombre de points avec 6, ce qui en fait le meilleur joueur sur les sites à l'extérieur de la UWS.
• Tulip City United Women est sur une série décevante lors des matchs à l'extérieur. Ils restent les moins performants avec 0 victoires lors des 6 derniers matchs disputés à l'extérieur de leur stade, ce qui est assez défavorable pour le club et ses supporters.
Tableau de la forme - Etats-Unis
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Coupe
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Coupe
- Coupe
- Coupe
































