Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 33% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 10 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 15 | 23 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 9 | 16 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Statesville | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% | |
| 14 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 21 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% | N/A |
| 24 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 27 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 36 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Hub City | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Newport | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 22 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 38 | -33 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 47 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 31 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 49 | -46 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 100% |
Bristol Rhythm AFC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Erie Commodores FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Virginia Dream FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Joy St. Louis Park
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hershey FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 55 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Bristol Rhythm AFC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Hershey FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 25 |
| 2.78 | 78% | 0% | 22% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 18 |
| 2.57 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 15 | 16 | 19 |
| 2.38 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 19 |
| 2.38 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 88% |
| 7 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.33 | 44% | 22% | 56% | 78% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 44 | 18 | 26 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 88% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 13% | 25% | 63% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.14 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 57% |
| 12 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 15 |
| 2.14 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 71% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Pride | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 78% |
| 15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 12 | 21 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 17 |
| 1.89 | 44% | 11% | 56% | 56% |
| 18 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 71% |
| 19 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 71% |
| 21 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 0% | 13% | 88% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Motown | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 14 |
| 1.56 | 11% | 22% | 67% | 89% |
| 24 | ![]() | Statesville | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 63% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | American SC New York | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 38% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 27 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 11% | 22% | 67% | 78% |
| 30 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 71% |
| 31 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 86% |
| 32 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 43% |
| 33 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 71% |
| 36 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 37 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.88 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 88% |
| 38 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.88 | 38% | 13% | 63% | 63% |
| 39 | ![]() | Hub City | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 22 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.88 | 0% | 13% | 88% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Newport | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 41 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 25 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.63 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 88% |
| 42 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 28 | -19 | 5 |
| 0.56 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 89% |
| 44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 63% |
| 46 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 88% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 71% |
| 48 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 53 | -47 | 1 |
| 0.11 | 0% | 44% | 56% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 53 | -45 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 54 | -51 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, Erie Commodores FC have been doing really well with 2.78 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Cleveland SC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Siouxland United FC, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.33 points per game. Can Siouxland United FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, New York Shockers fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New York Shockers is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 12 | 23 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 9 | 16 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 37 | ![]() | Newport | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 36 | -32 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 40% |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 22 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 26 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 42 | -39 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Ristozi FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Bristol Rhythm AFC is on the same track as Ristozi FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Erie Commodores FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes West Chester United Predators FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 12 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 23 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Pride | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Statesville | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 29 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hub City | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 38 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 41 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Newport | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 26 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 31 | -31 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Siouxland United FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.6.
• Ristozi FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Siouxland United FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 13 | 14 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | American SC New York | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 | ![]() | Newport | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 41 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 43 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 48 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 27 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Erie Commodores FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Erie Commodores FC have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































