- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- NPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 14 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 17 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 21 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 23 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 26 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 35 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 39 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 41 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 43 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 48 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 49 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 50 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 51 | ![]() | Statesville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 52 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 53 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 54 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 29 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 55 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 32 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Virginia Dream FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Jackson Lions FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
El Farolito SC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Niagara 1812
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hershey FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 55 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Virginia Dream FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Hershey FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 7 | 32 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 70% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 13 | 21 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 11 | 20 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 10 | 21 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
| 8 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 11 | 23 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 10 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 9 | 19 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 22 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 26 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 21 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 26 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 31 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 33 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
| 35 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 28 | -12 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | American SC New York | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 70% |
| 38 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 39 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 38 | -23 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
| 41 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 36 | -21 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 78% |
| 43 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 34 | -28 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 25 | -16 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 45 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 34 | -29 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
| 46 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 9 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 29 | -23 | 2 |
| 0.22 | 22% | 44% | 56% | 78% |
| 47 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 36 | -32 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 70% | 30% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | ![]() | Statesville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 44 | -37 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 55 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 58 | -54 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, El Farolito SC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Michigan Rangers FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Virginia Dream FC, whose tally of 23 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.3 points per game. Can Virginia Dream FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Siouxland United FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Siouxland United FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 33 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 43 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 22 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | ![]() | Statesville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 54 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 55 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 28 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Ambassadors FC Ohio is on the same track as Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Virginia Dream FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Dakota Fusion FC, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 6 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Pride | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 25 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 39 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 40 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 41 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | American SC New York | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 43 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Statesville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 51 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 52 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 53 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 20 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Virginia Dream FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• New Jersey United AC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 1.67 which is nearly as good as Virginia Dream FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pride | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 25 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | American SC New York | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Statesville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 51 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 52 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 53 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Jackson Lions FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Jackson Lions FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff























































