Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 100% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 17% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% | - |
Appalachian FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Flower City Union
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Virginia Dream FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
West Chester United Predators FC III
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Wisconsin Conquerors FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Katy 1895 FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 77 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Appalachian FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Katy 1895 FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 70% | 20% | 30% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 8 | 24 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 39 | 8 | 31 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 70% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 9 | 21 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 5 | 19 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 15 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 7 | 23 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 20% | 30% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 24 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 30 | ![]() | Port City FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 31 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 33 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 86% |
| 35 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 16 | 14 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 90% |
| 36 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 37 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 40 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 30% |
| 43 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 31 | -18 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 46 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 31 | -16 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 11% | 0% | 89% | 78% |
| 47 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 25 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 36 | -30 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, El Farolito SC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Flower City Union is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Virginia Dream FC, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can Virginia Dream FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, New Jersey United AC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New Jersey United AC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 100% | 40% | 0% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 31 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 41 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 42 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 43 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Virginia Dream FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Appalachian FC is on the same track as Virginia Dream FC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Flower City Union is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Hickory FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 4 | 18 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 17 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 43 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 45 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Virginia Dream FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• El Farolito SC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Virginia Dream FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 100% | 17% | 0% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 23 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 35 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 37 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 38 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 39 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 41 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 43 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 49 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 20 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• El Farolito SC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. El Farolito SC have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































