Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
11 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
12 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
15 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
17 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 33% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
28 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
30 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
31 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
32 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% | ![]() |
33 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 24 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
34 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 83% | ![]() |
35 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
36 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
37 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
38 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | N/A |
39 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
40 | ![]() | American SC New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
41 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
42 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
43 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
44 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
45 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
46 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
47 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
48 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 24 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 42 | -39 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
West Texas FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Virginia Dream FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Hartford City FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II)
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 67 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is West Texas FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 14 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 60% |
4 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
6 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 8 | 29 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 21 | 2 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
10 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
12 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
13 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
16 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 23 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 24 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 19 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
20 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
22 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 90% |
24 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 50% | 30% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 26 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 14 | 27 | -13 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 90% |
29 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
30 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
31 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 25 | -13 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 90% |
32 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 26 | -16 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 90% |
34 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 38 | -27 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 26 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
36 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 30 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
38 | ![]() | Port City FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 27 | -18 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 40 | -33 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 90% |
40 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | American SC New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 70 | -64 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, West Texas FC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Virginia Dream FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are FC Motown, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can FC Motown improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Hickory FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Hickory FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
30 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
31 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 17 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
34 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
36 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | American SC New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
40 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
47 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
48 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 20 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 24 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 37 | -34 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Pennsylvania Classics is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Alexandria Reds is on the same track as Pennsylvania Classics with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : West Texas FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Grove Soccer United, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
8 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
12 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 75% |
18 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
33 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
35 | ![]() | American SC New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
36 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
40 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
45 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
46 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
47 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
48 | ![]() | Port City FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
49 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• West Texas FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• FC Motown has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 2 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2 which is nearly as good as West Texas FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
10 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
11 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
13 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
18 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
21 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
26 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Port City FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
30 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
33 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | FC Motown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 16 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | American SC New York | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
40 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 29 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
48 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 17 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Virginia Dream FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Virginia Dream FC have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff