Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 5 | 24 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% | |
| 4 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% | |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Sun City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Motown | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 23 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Hub City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% | |
| 30 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 31 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 32 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 38 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Statesville | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Newport | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 46 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 51 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 52 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 53 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 24 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 28 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% | |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 46 | -42 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
El Farolito SC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Erie Commodores FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Michigan Rangers FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.6 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Hershey FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Real San Jose
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 55 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is El Farolito SC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Southern Indiana Guardians FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 5 | 24 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Pride | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Sun City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Motown | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Hub City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 26 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 33 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 37 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 42 | ![]() | Statesville | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Newport | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 51 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 52 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 53 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 24 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 28 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 46 | -42 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, El Farolito SC have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Erie Commodores FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Michigan Rangers FC, whose tally of 13 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.6 points per game. Can Michigan Rangers FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 5 | 24 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sun City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Motown | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Hub City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 27 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 37 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 41 | ![]() | Statesville | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Newport | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 48 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 51 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 52 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 53 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 24 | -24 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 28 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 37 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : El Farolito SC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Erie Commodores FC is on the same track as El Farolito SC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Michigan Rangers FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.25 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 6 | 25 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 17 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Hub City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | American SC New York | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Pride | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Statesville | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Newport | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 48 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 51 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 52 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 53 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 23 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• El Farolito SC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Michigan Rangers FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as El Farolito SC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sun City | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Vacaville Elite | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Hub City | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | American SC New York | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Newport | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Statesville | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 50 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 52 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 53 | ![]() | FC Motown | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 54 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 55 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 23 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Erie Commodores FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Erie Commodores FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff























































