Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 33% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 9 | 22 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 15 | 23 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Statesville | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 14 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 13 | 9 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% | N/A |
| 22 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | |
| 30 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Newport | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Hub City | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 20 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 38 | -33 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 47 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 16 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 50% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 31 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 53 | -50 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 100% |
Ristozi FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Bristol Rhythm AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Erie Commodores FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Joy St. Louis Park
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hershey FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 55 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Ristozi FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Hershey FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 21 |
| 3.00 | 86% | 0% | 14% | 29% |
| 2 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 2 | 29 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 21 |
| 2.63 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 15 | 27 | 22 |
| 2.44 | 11% | 0% | 89% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 19 |
| 2.38 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 88% |
| 6 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.33 | 44% | 22% | 56% | 78% |
| 7 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 71% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 44 | 18 | 26 | 18 |
| 2.25 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 88% |
| 9 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 22% | 0% | 78% | 78% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 12 | 21 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 11% | 33% | 56% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 17 |
| 1.89 | 44% | 11% | 56% | 56% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Pride | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 14 | 18 | 17 |
| 1.89 | 11% | 0% | 89% | 89% |
| 16 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 17 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 15 |
| 1.88 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 63% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 14 |
| 1.75 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 63% |
| 20 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 13% | 0% | 88% | 88% |
| 21 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Motown | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 38% | 0% | 63% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 63% |
| 24 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 14 |
| 1.56 | 11% | 22% | 67% | 89% |
| 25 | ![]() | Statesville | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 63% |
| 26 | ![]() | American SC New York | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 12 |
| 1.50 | 38% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 27 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 0% | 22% | 78% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 22% | 22% | 56% | 56% |
| 29 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.44 | 11% | 22% | 67% | 78% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 24 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.38 | 13% | 13% | 75% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 28 | -12 | 12 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 11% | 89% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 43% |
| 34 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 71% |
| 36 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 13% | 63% | 75% |
| 37 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 38 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.88 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 88% |
| 39 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.88 | 38% | 13% | 63% | 63% |
| 40 | ![]() | Hub City | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 0% | 22% | 78% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Newport | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.71 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 86% |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 28 | -17 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 25 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.63 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 88% |
| 44 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 32 | -22 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 90% |
| 45 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.38 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 88% |
| 46 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 56% | 44% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 71% |
| 48 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 53 | -47 | 1 |
| 0.11 | 0% | 44% | 56% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 53 | -45 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 38% | 63% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 65 | -62 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 88% | 13% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, Erie Commodores FC have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Jackson Lions FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.44 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Ristozi FC, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.63 points per game. Can Ristozi FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, New York Shockers fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. New York Shockers is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 12 | 23 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 9 | 16 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 30 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 37 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Newport | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 36 | -32 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 14 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 22 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 26 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 49 | -46 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Ristozi FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Bristol Rhythm AFC is on the same track as Ristozi FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Erie Commodores FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Oakland Stompers, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 10 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Pride | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 25 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 26 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 27 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Statesville | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 31 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 37 | ![]() | Hub City | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 41 | ![]() | Newport | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 42 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Sun City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 48 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 26 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 31 | -31 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Jackson Lions FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Siouxland United FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.6 which is nearly as good as Jackson Lions FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 21 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 16 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 13 | 14 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 19 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 21 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | American SC New York | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 35 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 38 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Newport | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 21 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 27 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 34 | -31 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Erie Commodores FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 6 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Erie Commodores FC have the highest points tally with 18 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































