Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 100% | - |
3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
4 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
6 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
7 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
8 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
9 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
10 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
11 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
13 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
14 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
15 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
16 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
17 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
18 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
19 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
20 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
21 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
22 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
23 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | - |
24 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
25 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 67% | - |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
27 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
28 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
29 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
30 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
31 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
32 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
33 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
34 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
35 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
36 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
37 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
38 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
39 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
40 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | - |
41 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
42 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
43 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
44 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
45 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
46 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
47 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
48 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
49 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 23 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
El Farolito SC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Flower City Union
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Ristozi FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Wisconsin Conquerors FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Oklahoma United FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 68 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is El Farolito SC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 3 | 28 | 30 |
| 3.00 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 70% |
2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 47 | 12 | 35 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 9 | 25 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
4 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 9 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
6 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 13 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 41 | 15 | 26 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 10 | 21 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 11 | 23 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
14 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 70% |
15 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
16 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 11 | 20 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
18 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
21 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 9 | 19 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
25 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Port City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
28 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
30 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 26 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
31 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
32 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 90% |
33 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
34 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 19 | 12 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 40% |
36 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
37 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
38 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
39 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
40 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
41 | ![]() | American SC New York | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 70% |
42 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
43 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
44 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 38 | -23 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
45 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 25 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
46 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 36 | -21 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
47 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 78% |
48 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 34 | -28 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 32 | -24 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 90% |
50 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, El Farolito SC have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Virginia Dream FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are West Texas FC, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can West Texas FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Jacksonville Armada FC II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Jacksonville Armada FC II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
19 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
20 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
21 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
30 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
31 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
32 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
36 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
39 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
40 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
42 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
43 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
45 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
46 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
47 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
48 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
49 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : El Farolito SC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Virginia Dream FC is on the same track as El Farolito SC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Flower City Union is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Ambassadors FC Ohio, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
4 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
10 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
16 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | FC Pride | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
28 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
37 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Port City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
42 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
45 | ![]() | American SC New York | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
46 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
47 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• West Texas FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 2 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.
• Hickory FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.4 which is nearly as good as West Texas FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
4 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
7 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
8 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | FC Pride | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Port City FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
18 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
19 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
21 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
23 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
24 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
30 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
33 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
39 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
42 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
45 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
47 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
48 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Jackson Lions FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Jackson Lions FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff