Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 3 | 35 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | N/A |
5 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
8 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
9 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% | N/A |
13 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
20 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% | N/A |
23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Port City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% | N/A |
28 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
30 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% | ![]() |
31 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
32 | ![]() | FC Florida | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% | N/A |
33 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% | N/A |
34 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | ![]() |
35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% | ![]() |
36 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% | ![]() |
37 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
38 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | N/A |
39 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
40 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
41 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
42 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
43 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% | ![]() |
44 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% | N/A |
45 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 20% | ![]() |
46 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% | ![]() |
47 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% | ![]() |
48 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
49 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 36 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% | ![]() |
Virginia Dream FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Hickory FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Jacksonville Armada FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.865 Alliance
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Katy 1895 FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 75 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Virginia Dream FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 3 | 35 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
13 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
20 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
22 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Port City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
25 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
31 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
32 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | FC Florida | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
34 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
35 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
36 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
37 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
40 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
45 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
46 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
47 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
48 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 36 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, Virginia Dream FC have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Hickory FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Jacksonville Armada FC II, whose tally of 12 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 3 points per game. Can Jacksonville Armada FC II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Appalachian FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Appalachian FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 3 | 35 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
12 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
13 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
21 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
24 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Port City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
32 | ![]() | FC Florida | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
33 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
34 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
36 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
37 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
40 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
44 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
45 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
46 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
47 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
48 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 36 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Virginia Dream FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Hickory FC is on the same track as Virginia Dream FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Jacksonville Armada FC II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 3 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Appalachian FC, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | American SC New York | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | FC Florida | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Port City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
34 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
38 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
45 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
46 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
47 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
48 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Jacksonville Armada FC II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Hickory FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Jacksonville Armada FC II.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Port City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Des Moines United FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
29 | ![]() | FC Florida | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Syracuse FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
33 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
34 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
35 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
39 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Arkansas Wolves FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
41 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
42 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
45 | ![]() | American SC New York | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
46 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
47 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
48 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Greater Lowell Rough Diamonds | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• New Jersey United AC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. New Jersey United AC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff