Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 67% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Newport | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Statesville | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 18 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Sun City | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 20 | -9 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 29 | -24 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Hub City | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 23 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 42 | -35 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 55 | -49 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | - |
El Farolito SC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Ambassadors FC Ohio
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Oakland Stompers
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Real San Jose
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hershey FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 55 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is El Farolito SC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Hershey FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 2 | 29 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 90% | 20% | 10% | 70% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 10 | 18 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 9 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 56 | 29 | 27 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 10 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 21 | 16 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 13 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 40 | 21 | 19 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | American SC New York | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 41 | 23 | 18 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Sun City | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 7 | 24 | 13 |
| 1.63 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 63% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 22 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Newport | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 24 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 26 | ![]() | Statesville | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 20 | -4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 20 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 22 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 90% |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 29 | -7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 33 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 34 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.22 | 11% | 22% | 67% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 36 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 31 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 38 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 30 | -13 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 28 | -15 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 40 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 78% |
| 43 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 38 | -25 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 90% |
| 44 | ![]() | Hub City | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 34 | -16 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 31 | -20 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 90% |
| 46 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 42 | -32 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 32 | -24 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 59 | -50 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 61 | -51 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 79 | -73 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, El Farolito SC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Ristozi FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Siouxland United FC, whose tally of 23 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.3 points per game. Can Siouxland United FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Michigan Rangers FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Michigan Rangers FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Newport | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 20 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Sun City | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 35 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 41 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 43 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 27 | -24 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 31 | -24 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 24 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 40 | -34 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : El Farolito SC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Michigan Rangers FC is on the same track as El Farolito SC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Duluth FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Siouxland United FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 4 | 26 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Statesville | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Newport | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 40 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Sun City | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 29 | -25 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 40 | -40 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• El Farolito SC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Ambassadors FC Ohio has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as El Farolito SC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Bristol Rhythm AFC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 10 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 11 | 21 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 83% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Newport | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 19 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Sun City | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Greenville United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Oakland Stompers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 13 | 14 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Statesville | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 25 | -20 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
| 36 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 37 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 38 | ![]() | Hub City | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Mint Hill | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 43 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 26 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
| 45 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Burlington United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Real San Jose | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 27 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 32 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 39 | -33 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Erie Commodores FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 6 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Erie Commodores FC have the highest points tally with 18 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































