- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- USL League Two
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA USL League Two
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - USL League Two
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | N/A |
| 3 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 4 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 5 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 33% | 0% | 33% | N/A |
| 8 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 11 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | |
| 14 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Santafé Wanderers | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | Project 51O | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | N/A |
| 26 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 83% | 67% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 30 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | |
| 32 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Academica SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Sunflower State FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Memphis FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 39 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | Weston FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 46 | ![]() | Jackson Boom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 47 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 48 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | N/A | |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 23 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 32 | -31 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 83% |
Almaden FC
is currently the most in form team in the USL League Two. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Colorado Storm
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Albion SC Colorado
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Shark Coast
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Fort Worth Vaqueros FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Miami Athletic Club
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- USL League Two (USA) Form Table consists of 158 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the USL League Two is Almaden FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the USL League Two is Miami Athletic Club
Last 10 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 2 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 9 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 30% |
| 7 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 17 | 11 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 9 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Peoria City | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 18 | ![]() | Project 51O | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 70% | 50% | 20% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 16 | 19 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 90% |
| 24 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 26 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sunflower State FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 28 | ![]() | Santafé Wanderers | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 28 | -7 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 29 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
| 30 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 32 | ![]() | Academica SC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | River Light FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 20 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 26 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 36 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 37 | -25 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 90% |
| 40 | ![]() | Memphis FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 27 | -16 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Stars FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 42 | ![]() | Weston FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 26 | -14 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 90% |
| 43 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 30 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 44 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 30% |
| 45 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 32 | -24 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 90% |
| 46 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Jackson Boom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 44 | -40 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For USL League Two
• During the last 10 games, Des Moines Menace have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the USL League Two just based on the last 10 matches.
• Capistrano FC II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 USL League Two games, Almaden FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Almaden FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 12 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Santafé Wanderers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 30 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 33 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Memphis FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 40 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Sunflower State FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 43 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Jackson Boom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 29 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Albion SC Colorado is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Almaden FC is on the same track as Albion SC Colorado with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : The Villages FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes San Francisco Glens SC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Project 51O | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Memphis FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Sunflower State FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | River Light FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Stars FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 34 | ![]() | Santafé Wanderers | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Weston FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Jackson Boom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Academica SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 24 | -23 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• The Villages FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Capistrano FC II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the USL League Two home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as The Villages FC.
Away Form Table (USL League Two)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Santafé Wanderers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 12 | ![]() | Northern Indiana FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Bangers FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Academica SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Peoria City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Project 51O | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | River Light FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | St. Louis Ambush | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Springfield FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Red River Raiders FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Memphis FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Mississippi Brilla FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 34 | ![]() | Sunflower State FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Bigfoot FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 37 | ![]() | Stars FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Southern California Seahorses | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Weston FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Jackson Boom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Almaden FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Almaden FC have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the USL League Two.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































