Tableau de la forme - Etats-Unis USL League Two

Competition
Buts
- Stats dans cette catégorie :
- Tableaux extérieur & domicile -
- Tableau de Forme -
- Avantage à domicile -
- Pronostics -
- Fréquentation -
- Statistiques des joueurs -
- Egalités -
- Salaires
Tableau de la forme - USL League Two
# | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | Match suivant | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | - |
2 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | - |
3 | ![]() | FC Motown II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
4 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
5 | ![]() | Sarasota Paradise | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 24 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% | - |
6 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
7 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
8 | ![]() | North Carolina Fusion U23 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
9 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
10 | ![]() | Laredo Heat | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
11 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Hammers | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
12 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 33% | - |
13 | ![]() | Sporting JAX | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
14 | ![]() | Utah United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
15 | ![]() | Michigan Bucks | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
16 | ![]() | Western Mass Pioneers | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
17 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
18 | ![]() | Akron City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | - |
19 | ![]() | Steel City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
20 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
21 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
22 | ![]() | Sueno FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
23 | ![]() | Asheville City SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
24 | ![]() | Evergreen FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
25 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
26 | ![]() | Ocean City Noreasters FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
27 | ![]() | FC Tucson | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
28 | ![]() | Lionsbridge FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 83% | 67% | 17% | 33% | - |
29 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
30 | ![]() | Long Island Rough Riders | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
31 | ![]() | Fort Wayne FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
32 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
33 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
34 | ![]() | Lonestar | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
35 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
36 | ![]() | Oly Town FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
37 | ![]() | Brazos Valley FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
38 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
39 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 83% | 67% | 17% | 33% | - |
40 | ![]() | Manhattan SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
41 | ![]() | Rochester FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
42 | ![]() | Cleveland Force SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
43 | ![]() | Vermont Green FC | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 83% | 83% | 17% | 17% | - |
44 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | - |
45 | ![]() | Discoveries SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
46 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
47 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
48 | ![]() | Chicago Dutch Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
49 | ![]() | Staten Island Athletic Sporting Club | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
50 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
TABLEAU DES 5 DERNIÈRES FORMES (USL League Two)
# | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Akron City FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
4 | ![]() | FC Motown II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
5 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Sarasota Paradise | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
8 | ![]() | Evergreen FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | North Carolina Fusion U23 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Fort Wayne FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Sueno FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Laredo Heat | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Sporting JAX | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Utah United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
21 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC II | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Michigan Bucks | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
23 | ![]() | Western Mass Pioneers | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
24 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Hammers | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
26 | ![]() | Asheville City SC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Steel City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Long Island Rough Riders | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
31 | ![]() | Ocean City Noreasters FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
32 | ![]() | FC Tucson | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
33 | ![]() | Lionsbridge FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
34 | ![]() | Oly Town FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 20% |
36 | ![]() | Brazos Valley FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Rochester FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
38 | ![]() | Lonestar | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
39 | ![]() | Manhattan SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
40 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | Vermont Green FC | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
42 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
43 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
44 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
45 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
46 | ![]() | Cleveland Force SC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
47 | ![]() | Chicago Dutch Lions FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
48 | ![]() | Discoveries SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
49 | ![]() | Staten Island Athletic Sporting Club | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
50 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Quelles sont les équipes qui s'en sortent bien d'après leur forme des 5 derniers matchs ? - Guide de forme
• Excellent : Almaden FC se porte exceptionnellement bien avec 2.6 points par match lors des 5 derniers matchs.
• Très bien : Colorado Storm est sur la même piste que Almaden FC avec une moyenne de 2.4 de points par match sur les 5 derniers matchs
• Assez bien : Sarasota Paradise est la 3ème équipe la plus performante avec 3 victoires et 0 défaites lors des 5 derniers matchs avec une moyenne de 2.2 points par match.
• Performance moyenne : il y a quelques équipes qui ont été très moyennes récemment. Cela inclut Sueno FC, dont les 3 victoires, les 1 égalités et les 1 défaites les amènent à un nombre décevant de 2 points par match jusqu'à présent cette saison.
TABLEAU DE FORME A DOMICILE (USL League Two)
# | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Sporting JAX | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Sarasota Paradise | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 100% | 17% | 0% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | FC Motown II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
6 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
7 | ![]() | Sueno FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | FC Tucson | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
9 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Laredo Heat | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 11 | 15 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Fort Wayne FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 18 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Discoveries SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | North Carolina Fusion U23 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
16 | ![]() | Steel City FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 33% |
18 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Western Mass Pioneers | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Long Island Rough Riders | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Asheville City SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
23 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Hammers | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
24 | ![]() | Evergreen FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
25 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Utah United | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 33% |
28 | ![]() | Lionsbridge FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Rochester FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
31 | ![]() | Michigan Bucks | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | Brazos Valley FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Akron City FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Lonestar | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
37 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
38 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
39 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Vermont Green FC | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 100% | 83% | 0% | 17% |
41 | ![]() | Ocean City Noreasters FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Staten Island Athletic Sporting Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
44 | ![]() | Oly Town FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
45 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
46 | ![]() | Manhattan SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
47 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
48 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
49 | ![]() | Chicago Dutch Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
50 | ![]() | Cleveland Force SC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Quelles équipes ont les meilleurs et les pires formes à domicile ?
• Little Rock Rangers SC a été la plus performante dans son avec à domicile avec 0 défaites et 6 victoires lors des 6 derniers matchs à domicile. Leur moyenne de points par match est la plus élevée parmi tous les autres clubs avec 3.
• FC Tucson a montré d'excellentes performances dans son stade (Kino North Stadium). Avec 5 wins, 1 draw, et 0 losses. Leur forme les amène à la 2e place dans le tableau des formulaires à domicile USL League Two. Le nombre moyen de points par match est de 2.67, ce qui est presque aussi bon que Little Rock Rangers SC.
TABLEAU DE FORME A L'EXTERIEUR (USL League Two)
# | Equipe | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | 6 derniers matchs | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Plus de 2,5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Asheville City SC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | FC Motown II | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
4 | ![]() | Laredo Heat | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Vermont Green FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Sarasota Paradise | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Western Mass Pioneers | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
8 | ![]() | North Carolina Fusion U23 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
9 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 83% | 33% | 0% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Lionsbridge FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Des Moines Menace | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
12 | ![]() | Evergreen FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
14 | ![]() | Steel City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Ocean City Noreasters FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Fort Wayne FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
18 | ![]() | Sueno FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Ventura County Fusion SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Midwest United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Cleveland Force SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Akron City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
23 | ![]() | Michigan Bucks | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
24 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Utah United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC II | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
28 | ![]() | Long Island Rough Riders | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
31 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Rochester FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
35 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
36 | ![]() | Lonestar | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
37 | ![]() | Hudson Valley Hammers | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
39 | ![]() | Sporting JAX | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
40 | ![]() | Oly Town FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | FC Tucson | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
42 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
43 | ![]() | Brazos Valley FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
44 | ![]() | Manhattan SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
45 | ![]() | Discoveries SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
46 | ![]() | Staten Island Athletic Sporting Club | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
47 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
48 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
49 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
50 | ![]() | Chicago Dutch Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
Quelles équipes ont les meilleurs et les pires formes à l'extérieur ?
• Asheville City SC est sur une course incroyable en jouant lors de matchs à l'extérieur. Ils ont réussi à remporter 5 lors de leurs 6 derniers matchs joués à l'extérieur. Asheville City SC a le plus grand nombre de points avec 16, ce qui en fait le meilleur joueur sur les sites à l'extérieur de la USL League Two.
Tableau de la forme - Etats-Unis
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Coupe
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Coupe
- Coupe
- Coupe