- FootyStats的足球统计数据
- ›
- 美国
- ›
- 美国足球乙级联赛
- ›
- 状态表
状态表 - 美国足球乙级联赛
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | 下一场球赛 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Project 51O | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 10 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Dothan United | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 13 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Stars FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 16 | ![]() | 文图拉县溶合 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Northern Indiana | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | 得梅因威胁 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | Red River | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Weston FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Bangers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | N/A |
| 27 | ![]() | River Light FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | 密西西比布里拉 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | N/A |
| 34 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | St Louis Ambush | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Atletico Union | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | N/A |
| 40 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 42 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 44 | ![]() | 南加州海马 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Academica SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 19 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 47 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | N/A |
最近5场比赛状态表 (美国足球乙级联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | Last 5 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 13 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | 文图拉县溶合 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Stars FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | 得梅因威胁 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Red River | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Northern Indiana | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Weston FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | River Light FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Bangers | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | 密西西比布里拉 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Atletico Union | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | St Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 37 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | 南加州海马 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Springfield | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
根据Last 5 Form,哪些团队表现良好? - 表格指南
• 优异 :Snohomish United 在过去 5 场比赛中,每场比赛都获得3分,表现地非常出色。
• 非常好:San Francisco City FC与Snohomish United在同一级别上,在过去的5场比赛中,平均每场比赛都得3分。
• 相当不错:Peoria City 是过去 5 场比赛中表现最佳的球队中,排名第三的球队,5获胜,0失败,每场比赛平均获得3分。
• 表现普通:最近有几支球队表现平平。这包括Fort Lauderdale United,他们的4获胜、0平局和1失败,使他们本赛季到目前为止的场均得分为2.4分。
主场状态表 (美国足球乙级联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Dothan United | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Northern Indiana | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Bangers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Red River | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Stars FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | 南加州海马 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Project 51O | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | 文图拉县溶合 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | 得梅因威胁 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 28 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | 密西西比布里拉 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 30 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 35 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Weston FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | River Light FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | St Louis Ambush | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 42 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Atletico Union | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 44 | ![]() | Academica SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 45 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Springfield | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 19 | -18 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
在主场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• Minneapolis City SC在过去的6场主场比赛中,一直是主场表现最好的球队。有0场的败绩和5场的胜利。他们每场比赛的平均得分为3分,在所有俱乐部中排名最高。
• Ballard FC 在他们的主场一直表现很出色。 5场的获胜,0场的平局和0局的失败。使他们在美国足球乙级联赛的主场纪录表格中排名第二。每场比赛的平均得分为3分,几乎与Minneapolis City SC一样好。
客场状态表 (美国足球乙级联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Project 51O | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ballard FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | San Francisco City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Fort Lauderdale United | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | 文图拉县溶合 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Peoria City | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Colorado Storm | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Albion SC Colorado | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Minneapolis City SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Snohomish United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | The Villages FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Lakeland United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Redlands FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Almaden FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Miami Athletic Club | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 17 | ![]() | Apotheos FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Dothan United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | St Louis Ambush | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 21 | ![]() | Denton Diablos FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Capistrano FC II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Weston FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Atletico Union | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Red River | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Stars FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Kings Hammer Columbus | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | 得梅因威胁 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Racine Kenosha County Soccer Club | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | River Light FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Davis Legacy SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Marin FC Legends | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Academica SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Toledo Villa FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Bangers | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Dayton Dutch Lions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | 密西西比布里拉 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 38 | ![]() | Shark Coast | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | West Seattle Junction FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | San Juan SC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Springfield | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Northern Indiana | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 44 | ![]() | Midlakes United | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | 南加州海马 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 46 | ![]() | Edgewater Castle | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Bigfoot | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 18 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | AMSG FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Flatirons Rush Pro Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
在客场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• Project 51O在客场比赛中表现出色。他们在最近6场客场比赛中,都取得了5场的胜利。Project 51O获得了15分,这使他们成为美国足球乙级联赛的客场比赛中,表现最好的球队。
状态表 - 美国
美国职业足球大联盟 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
美国足球冠军联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
美国足球冠军乙级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
国家女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
美国足球乙级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
美国足球冠军甲级联赛 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
美国公开杯 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
NPSL国家足球超级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
WPSL女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
国家独立足球协会 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
国家女子足球联赛挑战杯 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
国家女子足球联赛秋季 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
UWS女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
USL W League 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
MLS Next Pro 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
Leagues Cup 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
MLS All Star 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
USL Cup 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯


















































