Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 100% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% | - |
Hickory FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Appalachian FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Flower City Union
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
West Chester United Predators FC III
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Wisconsin Conquerors FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Katy 1895 FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 77 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Hickory FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Katy 1895 FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 6 | 24 | 27 |
| 2.70 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 8 | 24 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 90% |
| 4 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 13 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 39 | 8 | 31 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 9 | 25 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
| 7 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 15 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 30 | 7 | 23 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 20% | 30% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 17 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 12 | 11 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 24 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 31 | ![]() | Port City FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 32 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 33 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 86% |
| 34 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 16 | 14 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 90% |
| 35 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 24 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 36 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 37 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 38 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 39 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 40 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 30% |
| 43 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 31 | -18 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 46 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 31 | -16 | 7 |
| 0.78 | 11% | 0% | 89% | 78% |
| 47 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 19 | 25 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 78% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 36 | -30 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, Hickory FC have been doing really well with 2.8 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• El Farolito SC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.7 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Flower City Union, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Flower City Union improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Ambassadors FC Ohio fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Ambassadors FC Ohio is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 7 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 32 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 34 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 36 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 38 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 40 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 42 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 43 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 45 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Hickory FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Virginia Dream FC is on the same track as Hickory FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Appalachian FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Club De Lyon FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 20 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Port City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 43 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 44 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 45 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Hickory FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Virginia Dream FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Hickory FC.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | El Farolito SC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Hickory FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| 5 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | West Texas FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Jacksonville Armada FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Oklahoma United FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Lubbock Matadors | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Naples United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Charlottetowne Hops FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Cruizers FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Appalachian FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club De Lyon FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 30 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueros FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Port City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 33 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Electric City Shock | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 36 | ![]() | California Odyssey SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 37 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 38 | ![]() | Sacramento Gold | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 41 | ![]() | Hartford City FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | New Orleans Jesters | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 43 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 47 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 48 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 49 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union Development Squad (Philadelphia Union III) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Katy 1895 FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 20 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• El Farolito SC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 6 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. El Farolito SC have the highest points tally with 18 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















































