Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 13 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 21 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Philadelphia Union II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
New York Red Bulls II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Colorado Rapids II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Los Angeles Galaxy II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Connecticut United
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Philadelphia Union II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Connecticut United
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 14 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 23 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 27 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 24 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 24 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 29 | -8 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 24 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 32 | -22 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, New York Red Bulls II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Colorado Rapids II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Philadelphia Union II, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Philadelphia Union II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Huntsville City FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Huntsville City FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses.
• Connecticut United is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 12 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : New York Red Bulls II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Colorado Rapids II is on the same track as New York Red Bulls II with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Huntsville City FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Portland Timbers II, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Connecticut United's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 0 goals and conceded 0! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Connecticut United play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% |
| 13 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• New York Red Bulls II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.6.
• Philadelphia Union II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as New York Red Bulls II.
• Chicago Fire Premier FC II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Chicago Fire Premier FC II managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Los Angeles Galaxy II's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 2 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Los Angeles Galaxy II is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 16 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 29 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Connecticut United | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Minnesota United FC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Minnesota United FC II have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Connecticut United is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























