Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - New Zealand Regional Leagues
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Regional Leagues
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 6 | 19 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 28 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 17% | ![]() |
30 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
31 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
Cashmere Technical
is currently the most in form team in the Regional Leagues. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Western Springs AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Western Suburbs FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Island Bay United
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Selwyn United FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Universities of Canterbury AFC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Regional Leagues (New Zealand) Form Table consists of 32 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Regional Leagues is Cashmere Technical
- The team with the worst form currently in the Regional Leagues is Universities of Canterbury AFC
Last 10 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
2 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 11 | 24 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 16 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
6 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 31 | 8 | 23 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 70% |
10 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Petone FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
20 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 19 | 34 | -15 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
23 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 25 | -15 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 31 | -17 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 29 | -12 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 28 | -16 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 39 | -21 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
31 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 38 | -21 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
32 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 35 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Regional Leagues
• During the last 10 games, Western Springs AFC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Regional Leagues just based on the last 10 matches.
• Cashmere Technical is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Miramar Rangers AFC, whose tally of 23 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.3 points per game. Can Miramar Rangers AFC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Regional Leagues games, Eastern Suburbs AFC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Eastern Suburbs AFC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
• Selwyn United FC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.3 points per game. This is the worst in the Regional Leagues. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 19 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
15 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Petone FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
20 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
24 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 25 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
31 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Cashmere Technical is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Western Suburbs FC is on the same track as Cashmere Technical with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Miramar Rangers AFC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Coastal Spirit, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Selwyn United FC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Regional Leagues.
• Dangerously poor : Universities of Canterbury AFC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Regional Leagues. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 7 goals and conceded 19! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Universities of Canterbury AFC play.
Home - Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 12 | 13 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
10 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
13 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
16 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
17 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
24 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
25 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
28 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
29 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
31 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 31 | -24 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Wellington Olympic has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• Cashmere Technical has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Regional Leagues home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Wellington Olympic.
• West Coast Rangers FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. West Coast Rangers FC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.17 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Regional Leagues at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Selwyn United FC's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Selwyn United FC is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5 | 19 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
8 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
9 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
14 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
20 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
21 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
26 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 27 | -15 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
30 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
31 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 24 | -18 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 32 | -23 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Birkenhead United is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Birkenhead United have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Regional Leagues.
• Universities of Canterbury AFC is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - New Zealand
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 1
- Division 1