Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - New Zealand Regional Leagues
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Regional Leagues
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 6 | 16 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | |
| 19 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 31 | -23 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 100% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 27 | -17 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
Cashmere Technical
is currently the most in form team in the Regional Leagues. They picked up an average of 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Eastern Suburbs AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Western Springs AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
West Coast Rangers FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Universities of Canterbury AFC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Selwyn United FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Regional Leagues (New Zealand) Form Table consists of 32 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Regional Leagues is Cashmere Technical
- The team with the worst form currently in the Regional Leagues is Selwyn United FC
Last 10 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 34 | 10 | 24 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 4 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 15 | 16 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 19 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 70% |
| 11 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 13 | 14 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 26 | 15 | 11 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 20 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 18 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Petone FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 22 | 23 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 20 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 70% |
| 22 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 25 | -16 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 29 | -11 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 27 | -16 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 38 | -26 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 49 | -34 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 30% | 70% | 30% | 10% |
| 31 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 43 | -30 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
| 32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 39 | -29 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Regional Leagues
• During the last 10 games, Cashmere Technical have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Regional Leagues just based on the last 10 matches.
• Wellington Olympic is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Miramar Rangers AFC, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can Miramar Rangers AFC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Regional Leagues games, Nomads United AFC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Nomads United AFC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses.
• Universities of Canterbury AFC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.1 points per game. This is the worst in the Regional Leagues. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 15 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Petone FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 27 | -20 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
| 30 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Western Springs AFC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Cashmere Technical is on the same track as Western Springs AFC with an average of of 2.2 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Eastern Suburbs AFC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Auckland FC II, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Universities of Canterbury AFC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.2 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Regional Leagues.
• Dangerously poor : Island Bay United's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Regional Leagues. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 1 goals and conceded 17! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Island Bay United play.
Home - Form Table (Regional Leagues)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 17% |
| 6 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 15 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 17 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 17 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 21 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
| 26 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 29 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 28 | -17 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Cashmere Technical has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.33.
• Auckland City FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Kiwitea Street). With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Regional Leagues home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Cashmere Technical.
• Selwyn United FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (). Selwyn United FC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (). Their average points per game is 0.17 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Regional Leagues at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Universities of Canterbury AFC's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Universities of Canterbury AFC is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Regional Leagues)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 17% |
| 19 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 23 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
| 24 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 25 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 29 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 25 | -16 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 22 | -16 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 31 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 21 | -18 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Cashmere Technical is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Cashmere Technical have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Regional Leagues.
• Universities of Canterbury AFC is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - New Zealand
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 1
- Division 1
































