Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - New Zealand Regional Leagues
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Regional Leagues
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 5 | 26 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Petone FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 27 | -14 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
30 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | ![]() |
31 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
32 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 27 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
Auckland City FC
is currently the most in form team in the Regional Leagues. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Christchurch United AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Miramar Rangers AFC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Auckland FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 1 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Eastern Suburbs AFC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.North Wellington AFC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Regional Leagues (New Zealand) Form Table consists of 32 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Regional Leagues is Auckland City FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Regional Leagues is North Wellington AFC
Last 10 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 11 | 22 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
4 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 39 | 9 | 30 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 70% |
7 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 17 |
| 1.89 | 33% | 11% | 56% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 10 | 21 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 86% |
10 | ![]() | Petone FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 25 | -8 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
11 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 24 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
12 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
13 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
15 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
17 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
18 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
19 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
20 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 39 | -16 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
22 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 28 | -11 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 90% |
25 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 27 | -14 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
26 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
27 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 36 | -24 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 90% |
28 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 30 | -19 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
30 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
31 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 35 | -22 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 90% |
32 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 30 | -20 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Regional Leagues
• During the last 10 games, Auckland City FC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Regional Leagues just based on the last 10 matches.
• Birkenhead United is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Christchurch United AFC, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can Christchurch United AFC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Regional Leagues games, Petone FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Petone FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• Auckland FC II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 1 points per game. This is the worst in the Regional Leagues. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 21 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 7 | 22 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Petone FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
31 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
32 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 23 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Auckland City FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Western Springs AFC is on the same track as Auckland City FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Auckland United FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Birkenhead United, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Eastern Suburbs AFC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.2 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Regional Leagues.
• Dangerously poor : North Wellington AFC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Regional Leagues. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 23! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching North Wellington AFC play.
Home - Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
4 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
9 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Petone FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
15 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
23 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
26 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
29 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Auckland City FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Kiwitea Street) with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Christchurch United AFC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Regional Leagues home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Auckland City FC.
• Western Suburbs FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Western Suburbs FC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Regional Leagues at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Island Bay United's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Island Bay United is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Island Bay United | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
19 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
21 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Petone FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
28 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
31 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Auckland City FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Auckland City FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Regional Leagues.
• Manurewa AFC is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - New Zealand
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 1
- Division 1