Home Advantage - New Zealand Regional Leagues
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Home Advantage - Regional Leagues
# | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | -9% | -5% | -12% | 0.00 /0.00 |
2 | ![]() | Petone FC | +8% | +19% | -3% | 0.00 /0.00 |
3 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | -17% | -16% | -18% | 0.00 /0.00 |
4 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | +25% | +75% | -25% | 0.00 /0.00 |
5 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | +47% | -6% | +100% | 0.00 /0.00 |
6 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | +9% | +29% | -11% | 0.00 /0.00 |
7 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | +6% | -5% | +17% | 0.00 /0.00 |
8 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | +58% | +66% | +50% | 0.00 /0.00 |
9 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | +53% | +56% | +50% | 0.00 /0.00 |
10 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | -17% | -17% | -17% | 0.00 /0.00 |
11 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | -52% | -100% | -4% | 0.00 /0.00 |
12 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | -20% | -18% | -22% | 0.00 /0.00 |
13 | ![]() | Island Bay United | -53% | -44% | -62% | 0.00 /0.00 |
14 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | -50% | -50% | -50% | 0.00 /0.00 |
15 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | -15% | 0% | -29% | 0.00 /0.00 |
16 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | +36% | +67% | +5% | 0.00 /0.00 |
17 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | +15% | +11% | +19% | 0.00 /0.00 |
18 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | -76% | -58% | -94% | 0.00 /0.00 |
19 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | +2% | -55% | +58% | 0.00 /0.00 |
20 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | -66% | -64% | -67% | 0.00 /0.00 |
21 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | +48% | +19% | +76% | 0.00 /0.00 |
22 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | +21% | -19% | +61% | 0.00 /0.00 |
23 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | +6% | +25% | -14% | 0.00 /0.00 |
24 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | +55% | +50% | +59% | 0.00 /0.00 |
25 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | +16% | +36% | -5% | 0.00 /0.00 |
26 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | -39% | -41% | -36% | 0.00 /0.00 |
27 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | +10% | -25% | +45% | 0.00 /0.00 |
28 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | -34% | -75% | +7% | 0.00 /0.00 |
29 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | -39% | -49% | -28% | 0.00 /0.00 |
30 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | +25% | +41% | +9% | 0.00 /0.00 |
31 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | -49% | -4% | -94% | 0.00 /0.00 |
32 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | -18% | -48% | +12% | 0.00 /0.00 |
1. Home Advantage : Increased overall performance levels of each team when they play at home venue.
2. Scoring : Increased likelihood of scoring more goals when the teams play at their home venue. Calculated based on the goals scored.
3. Defence : Increased likelihood of conceding less goals when the teams play at their home venue. Calculated based on the goals conceded.
Home Advantage is calculated based on how many more goals each team scores or concedes during their home matches.
This is an accurate way of measuring their home performance as it calculates using more accurate statistics rather than simply relying on match outcomes.
Which Team Has The Most Home Advantage in the Regional Leagues?
If we just talk about the home advantage of teams in the Regional Leagues, Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves, Universities of Canterbury AFC and Fencibles United AFC shows tremendous difference between home and away performance. For example, Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves scored 0% more goals at the home games compared to away games and conceded nearly 0% less goals at their home ground. Following a similar pattern, Universities of Canterbury AFC scored 0% more goals as the home team and conceded about 0% less goals. Going a little down the table South City Royals FC and Auckland United FC are enjoying a mild 0% and 0% of scoring advantage at home. Moreover, in terms of defence at home, South City Royals FC conceded 0% less goals at home and Auckland United FC shares similar stats of 0%.
Now, onto those Regional Leagues teams with 0 or negative home advantage which is rare. These teams are at the bottom of home advantage charts and they are Auckland FC II and Eastern Suburbs AFC. Neither team have been impressive at home. While Eastern Suburbs AFC scored 0% less goals playing at their home ground, Auckland FC II's output were also noticeably poor. Auckland FC II scored 0% less goals in their matches played home. They score more at away venues than at home. Auckland FC II also conceded 0% more goals at home, which is not only a rare occurrance, but also not a happy news for the Auckland FC II supporters.
Home Goals Scored Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | -5% | 0 | 0 |
2 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | +11% | 0 | 0 |
3 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | -4% | 0 | 0 |
4 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | +41% | 0 | 0 |
5 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | -49% | 0 | 0 |
6 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | -75% | 0 | 0 |
7 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | -25% | 0 | 0 |
8 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | -41% | 0 | 0 |
9 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | +36% | 0 | 0 |
10 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | +50% | 0 | 0 |
11 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | +25% | 0 | 0 |
12 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | -19% | 0 | 0 |
13 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | +19% | 0 | 0 |
14 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | -64% | 0 | 0 |
15 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | -55% | 0 | 0 |
16 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | -58% | 0 | 0 |
17 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | +67% | 0 | 0 |
18 | ![]() | Petone FC | +19% | 0 | 0 |
19 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | 0% | 0 | 0 |
20 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | -50% | 0 | 0 |
21 | ![]() | Island Bay United | -44% | 0 | 0 |
22 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | -18% | 0 | 0 |
23 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | -100% | 0 | 0 |
24 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | -17% | 0 | 0 |
25 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | +56% | 0 | 0 |
26 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | +66% | 0 | 0 |
27 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | -5% | 0 | 0 |
28 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | +29% | 0 | 0 |
29 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | -6% | 0 | 0 |
30 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | +75% | 0 | 0 |
31 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | -16% | 0 | 0 |
32 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | -48% | 0 | 0 |
Home Defence (Conceded) Table (Regional Leagues)
# | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Wellington Phoenix FC Reserves | -12% | 0 | 0 |
2 | ![]() | Petone FC | -3% | 0 | 0 |
3 | ![]() | Fencibles United AFC | -18% | 0 | 0 |
4 | ![]() | West Coast Rangers FC | -25% | 0 | 0 |
5 | ![]() | South City Royals FC | +100% | 0 | 0 |
6 | ![]() | Auckland United FC | -11% | 0 | 0 |
7 | ![]() | Christchurch United AFC | +17% | 0 | 0 |
8 | ![]() | Wanaka AFC | +50% | 0 | 0 |
9 | ![]() | Waterside Karori AFC | +50% | 0 | 0 |
10 | ![]() | North Wellington AFC | -17% | 0 | 0 |
11 | ![]() | Upper Hutt City | -4% | 0 | 0 |
12 | ![]() | Selwyn United FC | -22% | 0 | 0 |
13 | ![]() | Island Bay United | -62% | 0 | 0 |
14 | ![]() | Western Springs AFC | -50% | 0 | 0 |
15 | ![]() | Tauranga City United AFC | -29% | 0 | 0 |
16 | ![]() | Universities of Canterbury AFC | +5% | 0 | 0 |
17 | ![]() | Auckland City FC | +19% | 0 | 0 |
18 | ![]() | Ferrymead Bays FC | -94% | 0 | 0 |
19 | ![]() | Napier City Rovers | +58% | 0 | 0 |
20 | ![]() | Miramar Rangers AFC | -67% | 0 | 0 |
21 | ![]() | Coastal Spirit | +76% | 0 | 0 |
22 | ![]() | Birkenhead United | +61% | 0 | 0 |
23 | ![]() | Cashmere Technical | -14% | 0 | 0 |
24 | ![]() | Nelson Suburbs FC | +59% | 0 | 0 |
25 | ![]() | Bay Olympic | -5% | 0 | 0 |
26 | ![]() | East Coast Bays AFC | -36% | 0 | 0 |
27 | ![]() | Wellington Olympic | +45% | 0 | 0 |
28 | ![]() | Manurewa AFC | +7% | 0 | 0 |
29 | ![]() | Nomads United AFC | -28% | 0 | 0 |
30 | ![]() | Western Suburbs FC | +9% | 0 | 0 |
31 | ![]() | Eastern Suburbs AFC | -94% | 0 | 0 |
32 | ![]() | Auckland FC II | +12% | 0 | 0 |
Home Advantage - New Zealand
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 1
- Division 1