- FootyStats
- ›
- USA
- ›
- NPSL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA NPSL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - NPSL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | FC Pride | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 100% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Motown | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 13 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 16 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 20 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 23 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 27 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 28 | ![]() | American SC New York | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | |
| 29 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 30 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 31 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 32 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 35 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 22 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 38 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 39 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 40 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 24 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 32 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Virginia Dream FC
is currently the most in form team in the NPSL. They picked up an average of 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Jackson Lions FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Dakota Fusion FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Southern Indiana Guardians FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Niagara 1812
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hershey FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- NPSL (USA) Form Table consists of 42 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the NPSL is Virginia Dream FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the NPSL is Hershey FC
Last 10 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 14 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 11 | 20 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 10 | 21 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
| 7 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 11 | 23 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pride | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 9 | 19 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 13 | 12 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 19 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Motown | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 22 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 26 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 40% |
| 26 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
| 28 | ![]() | American SC New York | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 70% |
| 29 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 29 | -14 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 28 | -12 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
| 32 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 38 | -23 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
| 34 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 36 | -21 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.67 | 11% | 44% | 44% | 78% |
| 36 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 34 | -28 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 34 | -29 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
| 38 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 37 | -29 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 58 | -54 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 90% |
Last 10 Form Guide For NPSL
• During the last 10 games, Michigan Rangers FC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the NPSL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Virginia Dream FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Flower City Union, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Flower City Union improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 NPSL games, Dakota Fusion FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Dakota Fusion FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
• Hershey FC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the NPSL. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Motown | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Pride | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 25 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 26 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 29 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 30 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 32 | ![]() | American SC New York | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 34 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 35 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 36 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 37 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 20 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 28 | -26 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Ambassadors FC Ohio is on the same track as Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Virginia Dream FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes FC Motown, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Niagara 1812 has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the NPSL.
• Dangerously poor : Hershey FC's performance has statistically been the weakest in the NPSL. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 2 goals and conceded 28! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Hershey FC play.
Home - Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Pride | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Motown | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 20 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 22 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | American SC New York | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 39 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 40 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Virginia Dream FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• New Jersey United AC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the NPSL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 1.67 which is nearly as good as Virginia Dream FC.
• Southern Indiana Guardians FC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Southern Indiana Guardians FC managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in NPSL at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Hershey FC's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Hershey FC is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (NPSL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Jackson Lions FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Sioux Falls Thunder FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Soccer Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | New Haven United FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Pride | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | District Elite FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | American SC New York | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ristozi FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Joy St. Louis Park | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Motown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Duluth FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Osner’s FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | DMV Elite FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Rochester New York FC Academy (Rochester New York FC II) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Gio's Lions SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Frederick | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Players Development Academy | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 21 | ![]() | Siouxland United FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Ambassadors FC Ohio | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Flower City Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Dakota Fusion FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Virginia Dream FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Michigan Rangers FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Cleveland SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | New York Shockers | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Hub City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Southern Indiana Guardians FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Newport | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Santa Cruz FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Minnesota Blizzard FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Wisconsin Conquerors FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Buffalo Stallions | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 38 | ![]() | West Chester United Predators FC III | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Virginia Beach City FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Erie Commodores FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | New Jersey United AC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Hershey FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Jackson Lions FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Jackson Lions FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the NPSL.
• Hershey FC is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff










































