Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - USA MLS Next Pro
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - MLS Next Pro
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 3 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
Philadelphia Union II
is currently the most in form team in the MLS Next Pro. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Atlanta United FC II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
New York Red Bulls II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Los Angeles Football Club 2
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- MLS Next Pro (USA) Form Table consists of 29 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the MLS Next Pro is Philadelphia Union II
- The team with the worst form currently in the MLS Next Pro is Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Last 10 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 10 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 12 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 21 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 27 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 21 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
| 22 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 20 | 24 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 24 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 29 | -8 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 26 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 25 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 10 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 32 | -22 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For MLS Next Pro
• During the last 10 games, New York Red Bulls II have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the MLS Next Pro just based on the last 10 matches.
• Philadelphia Union II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are New England Revolution II, whose tally of 19 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.9 points per game. Can New England Revolution II improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 MLS Next Pro games, Austin FC II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Austin FC II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.4 points per game. This is the worst in the MLS Next Pro. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : New York Red Bulls II is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Huntsville City FC is on the same track as New York Red Bulls II with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : FC Cincinnati II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chattanooga FC, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the MLS Next Pro.
• Dangerously poor : Los Angeles Football Club 2's performance has statistically been the weakest in the MLS Next Pro. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 2 goals and conceded 9! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Los Angeles Football Club 2 play.
Home - Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 6 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 19 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
| 27 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 29 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Huntsville City FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• New York Red Bulls II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the MLS Next Pro home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Huntsville City FC.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.33 making them the 2nd worst performing side in MLS Next Pro at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Los Angeles Football Club 2's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 6 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Los Angeles Football Club 2 is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (MLS Next Pro)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | North Texas SC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | St. Louis City SC II | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | New England Revolution II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Austin FC II | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Colorado Rapids II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Real Monarchs SLC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Atlanta United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Minnesota United FC II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | San Jose Earthquakes II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Los Angeles Football Club 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Philadelphia Union II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Crown Legacy FC (Charlotte FC II) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tacoma Defiance | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Sporting Kansas City II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 16 | ![]() | Houston Dynamo FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Carolina Core FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 18 | ![]() | Toronto FC II USL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 19 | ![]() | Portland Timbers II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 20 | ![]() | Vancouver Whitecaps FC II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | New York Red Bulls II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Huntsville City FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Cincinnati II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | New York City FC II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Chicago Fire Premier FC II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Los Angeles Galaxy II | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Orlando City II | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 28 | ![]() | Columbus Crew II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 21 | -16 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• St. Louis City SC II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. St. Louis City SC II have the highest points tally with 13 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the MLS Next Pro.
• Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - USA
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 1
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 4
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff





























