Loading
FC Swift Hesperange vs FC Progrès NiederkornStats, H2H & xG


Data | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
Possession | 43% | 57% |
Shots | 12 | 11 |
Shots On Target | 8 | 3 |
Shots Off Target | 4 | 8 |
Cards | 3 | 2 |
Corners | 3 | 3 |
Fouls | N/A | N/A |
Offsides | N/A | N/A |
xG | 1.62 | 1.35 |
#
Starting 11
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
#
Substitutes
#
Starting 11
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
#
Substitutes
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
GPT-o1 AI Stats Summary
Under the Stade Alphonse Theis roof, this fixture leans towards a tight contest. Both teams display a cautious approach, with an average of just 25% for first-half BTTS and a mere 15% for the opening 45 minutes, suggesting a slow start is likely...
*FC Swift Hesperange and FC Progrès Niederkorn's average prediction data across current season
- L
- L
- W
- L
- L
- W
- L
- W
- L
- L
- D
- W
- L
- W
- L
- W
- W
- L
- W
- L
- L
- W
- W
- W
- L
- D
- W
- W
- L
- W


57%
Scored first in 16 / 28 matches


57%
Scored first in 16 / 28 matches
Goals By Minute
Swift Hesperange and Progrès Niederkorn's goals by 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
10 Mins | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 10 Mins | 7% | 11% |
11 - 20 Mins | 15% | 7% |
21 - 30 Mins | 10% | 11% |
31 - 40 Mins | 13% | 5% |
41 - 50 Mins | 13% | 15% |
51 - 60 Mins | 5% | 15% |
61 - 70 Mins | 8% | 8% |
71 - 80 Mins | 7% | 14% |
81 - 90 Mins | 19% | 12% |
15 Mins | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 15 Mins | 14% | 14% |
16 - 30 Mins | 19% | 15% |
31 - 45 Mins | 22% | 15% |
46 - 60 Mins | 8% | 20% |
61 - 75 Mins | 9% | 18% |
76 - 90 Mins | 24% | 16% |
Scored (10 min) | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 10 Mins | 6% | 13% |
11 - 20 Mins | 12% | 4% |
21 - 30 Mins | 15% | 11% |
31 - 40 Mins | 15% | 4% |
41 - 50 Mins | 13% | 15% |
51 - 60 Mins | 4% | 11% |
61 - 70 Mins | 8% | 9% |
71 - 80 Mins | 10% | 17% |
81 - 90 Mins | 17% | 13% |
Scored (15 min) | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 15 Mins | 13% | 15% |
16 - 30 Mins | 19% | 13% |
31 - 45 Mins | 25% | 15% |
46 - 60 Mins | 8% | 15% |
61 - 75 Mins | 10% | 21% |
76 - 90 Mins | 25% | 17% |
Conceded (10 min) | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 10 Mins | 9% | 7% |
11 - 20 Mins | 21% | 11% |
21 - 30 Mins | 3% | 11% |
31 - 40 Mins | 9% | 7% |
41 - 50 Mins | 12% | 15% |
51 - 60 Mins | 6% | 22% |
61 - 70 Mins | 9% | 7% |
71 - 80 Mins | 3% | 7% |
81 - 90 Mins | 21% | 11% |
Conceded (15 min) | Swift Hesperange | Progrès Niederkorn |
---|---|---|
0 - 15 Mins | 15% | 11% |
16 - 30 Mins | 18% | 19% |
31 - 45 Mins | 18% | 15% |
46 - 60 Mins | 9% | 30% |
61 - 75 Mins | 9% | 11% |
76 - 90 Mins | 24% | 15% |
45' and 90' includes injury time goals.
Cedric Biever
Cards & Bookings | Stat |
---|---|
Matches Refereed (in FooyStats Data) | 24 games |
Cards / Match | 3.96 cards |
Cards (Home Team) / Match | 1.79 cards |
Cards (Away Team) / Match | 2.17 cards |
Over 0.5 Cards | 100% |
Over 1.5 Cards | 96% |
Over 2.5 Cards | 88% |
Over 3.5 Cards | 54% |
Over 4.5 Cards | 28% |
Over 5.5 Cards | 8% |
Minutes / Card | 23 minutes |
Pens & Goals | Stat |
---|---|
Penalties / Match | 0.25 |
Home Team Pens / Match | 0.08 |
Away Team Pens / Match | 0.17 |
Goals / Match | 2.67 goals |
Home Team Scored | 1.42 goals |
Away Team Scored | 1.25 goals |
Referee stats (Cedric Biever) use the most recent data. Not pre-match data.
Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Differdange 03 |
14 | 86% | 32 | 1 | 31 | 38 | 2.36 |
2 |
Racing |
14 | 79% | 29 | 10 | 19 | 34 | 2.79 |
3 |
Progrès Niederkorn |
14 | 64% | 28 | 14 | 14 | 30 | 3.00 |
4 |
UNA Strassen |
14 | 64% | 35 | 9 | 26 | 29 | 3.14 |
5 |
Swift Hesperange |
14 | 64% | 29 | 13 | 16 | 28 | 3.00 |
6 |
F91 Dudelange |
14 | 57% | 31 | 20 | 11 | 26 | 3.64 |
7 |
Jeunesse d'Esch |
14 | 50% | 29 | 20 | 9 | 26 | 3.50 |
8 |
Mondorf-les-Bains |
14 | 50% | 23 | 19 | 4 | 24 | 3.00 |
9 |
UT Pétange |
14 | 36% | 20 | 12 | 8 | 19 | 2.29 |
10 |
Hostert |
14 | 36% | 22 | 31 | -9 | 18 | 3.79 |
11 |
Victoria Rosport |
14 | 29% | 11 | 15 | -4 | 17 | 1.86 |
12 |
Wiltz |
14 | 36% | 16 | 25 | -9 | 17 | 2.93 |
13 |
Rodange |
14 | 21% | 17 | 22 | -5 | 15 | 2.79 |
14 |
Bettembourg |
14 | 14% | 13 | 30 | -17 | 7 | 3.07 |
15 |
Fola Esch |
14 | 14% | 3 | 32 | -29 | 7 | 2.50 |
16 |
Mondercange |
14 | 7% | 7 | 27 | -20 | 5 | 2.43 |
Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Differdange 03 |
14 | 93% | 36 | 4 | 32 | 39 | 2.86 |
2 |
F91 Dudelange |
14 | 57% | 29 | 12 | 17 | 28 | 2.93 |
3 |
UNA Strassen |
14 | 50% | 23 | 14 | 9 | 25 | 2.64 |
4 |
Mondorf-les-Bains |
14 | 50% | 21 | 17 | 4 | 23 | 2.71 |
5 |
Progrès Niederkorn |
14 | 43% | 19 | 13 | 6 | 22 | 2.29 |
6 |
Swift Hesperange |
14 | 36% | 23 | 21 | 2 | 20 | 3.14 |
7 |
Racing |
14 | 36% | 17 | 10 | 7 | 19 | 1.93 |
8 |
UT Pétange |
14 | 36% | 13 | 16 | -3 | 19 | 2.07 |
9 |
Hostert |
14 | 43% | 25 | 28 | -3 | 19 | 3.79 |
10 |
Victoria Rosport |
14 | 21% | 14 | 25 | -11 | 14 | 2.79 |
11 |
Bettembourg |
14 | 29% | 13 | 24 | -11 | 13 | 2.64 |
12 |
Jeunesse d'Esch |
14 | 21% | 9 | 24 | -15 | 13 | 2.36 |
13 |
Wiltz |
14 | 21% | 16 | 29 | -13 | 11 | 3.21 |
14 |
Rodange |
14 | 21% | 19 | 32 | -13 | 11 | 3.64 |
15 |
Mondercange |
14 | 14% | 11 | 37 | -26 | 7 | 3.43 |
16 |
Fola Esch |
14 | 14% | 12 | 39 | -27 | 6 | 3.64 |
* Luxembourg National Division Home Table and Away Tables are also available
Showing the most recently used lineup for Swift Hesperange and Progrès Niederkorn.
#
Starting 11
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
#
Substitutes
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
#
Starting 11
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
#
Substitutes
Forwards
Midfielders
Defenders
Goalkeeper
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
* Stats from 2024/25 season of National Division
Green Odds are the best odds for that market. Red Odds are the lowest odds for that market.