Loading
Shanghai SIPG FC vs Chiangrai United FCStats, H2H & xG
Shanghai SIPG vs Chiangrai United's head to head record shows that in the previous 1 meetings, Shanghai SIPG has won 1 times, Chiangrai United has won 0 times, and 0 ended in a draw. Shanghai SIPG scored 1 goals and Chiangrai United scored 0 goals in these matches.
Shanghai SIPG v Chiangrai United Past H2H Results & Fixtures
*Shanghai SIPG FC and Chiangrai United FC's average prediction data across current season
- W
- D
- W
- W
- W
- L
- W
- D
- W
- W
- W
- W
- W
- W
- L
- L
- D
- L
- D
- L
- W
- W
- L
- W
- L
- D
- L
- D
Shanghai SIPG is +69% better in terms of Goals Scored
Shanghai SIPG at Home
Chiangrai United at Away
| Scored Per Game | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 90% |
| Over 1.5 | 100% | 40% |
| Over 2.5 | 50% | 20% |
| Over 3.5 | 20% | 10% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 10% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 80% | 70% |
| Scored in 2H | 80% | 40% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 60% | 20% |
| Scored Average 1H | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.10 | 0.80 |
* Stats include both home and away games that Shanghai SIPG FC and Chiangrai United FC have played.
Shanghai SIPG is +21% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Shanghai SIPG at Home
Chiangrai United at Away
| Conceded / Game | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 90% | 90% |
| Over 1.5 | 40% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 10% | 30% |
| Over 3.5 | 0% | 0% |
| Clean Sheets | 10% | 10% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 80% | 40% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 20% | 40% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0.2 | 1 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 1.20 | 0.70 |
* Goals conceded data include both home and away games that Shanghai SIPG FC and Chiangrai United FC have played.
UNLOCKCorners / Match
* Average Corner Kicks per match between Shanghai SIPG and Chiangrai United
| Match Corners | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 6 | |||
| Over 7 | |||
| Over 8 | |||
| Over 9 | |||
| Over 10 | |||
| Over 11 | |||
| Over 12 | |||
| Over 13 |
| First Half | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH Average | |||
| FH Over 4 | |||
| FH Over 5 | |||
| FH Over 6 |
| Second Half | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2H Average | |||
| 2H Over 4 | |||
| 2H Over 5 | |||
| 2H Over 6 |
Total Match Corners for Shanghai SIPG FC and Chiangrai United FC. League AVG is Asia AFC Champions League's average across 132 matches in the 2022 season.
Asia AFC Champions League Corner Stats
0%
10%
10%
High Chance
90%
* Sum of bookings per match between Shanghai SIPG and Chiangrai United
| Match Cards | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Over 3.5 | |||
| Over 4.5 | |||
| Over 5.5 | |||
| Over 6.5 |
| Team Cards | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cards For Average | |||
| Over 0.5 For | |||
| Over 1.5 For | |||
| Over 2.5 For | |||
| Over 3.5 For |
| Cards Against | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 Against | |||
| Over 1.5 Against | |||
| Over 2.5 Against | |||
| Over 3.5 Against |
Total Match Cards for Shanghai SIPG FC and Chiangrai United FC. League AVG is Asia AFC Champions League's average. There were 472 cards in 132 matches in the 2022 season.
Asia AFC Champions League Card StatsShanghai SIPG80%
Scored first in 8 / 10 matches
Chiangrai United60%
Scored first in 6 / 10 matches
Goals By Minute
Shanghai SIPG and Chiangrai United's goals by 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
| 10 Mins | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 2% | 6% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 7% | 9% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 7% | 6% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 5% | 12% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 28% | 21% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 15% | 6% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 15% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 7% | 9% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 12% | 27% |
| 15 Mins | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 5% | 9% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 12% | 12% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 27% | 33% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 22% | 6% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 17% | 9% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 17% | 27% |
| Scored (10 min) | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 0% | 6% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 11% | 13% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 11% | 13% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 7% | 0% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 37% | 19% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 11% | 6% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 7% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 7% | 19% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 7% | 25% |
| Scored (15 min) | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 4% | 13% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 19% | 19% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 37% | 19% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 19% | 6% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 11% | 19% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 11% | 25% |
| Conceded (10 min) | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 7% | 6% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 0% | 6% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 0% | 0% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 0% | 24% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 14% | 24% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 21% | 6% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 28% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 7% | 0% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 21% | 28% |
| Conceded (15 min) | Shanghai SIPG | Chiangrai United |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 7% | 6% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 0% | 6% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 7% | 47% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 28% | 6% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 28% | 0% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 28% | 28% |
45' and 90' includes injury time goals.
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Urawa Reds |
9 | 67% | 31 | 4 | 27 | 3.89 |
2 |
Al Shabab |
7 | 86% | 20 | 1 | 19 | 3.00 |
3 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
9 | 56% | 14 | 8 | 6 | 2.44 |
4 |
Al Hilal |
7 | 71% | 14 | 6 | 8 | 2.86 |
5 |
Al Duhail |
7 | 71% | 18 | 10 | 8 | 4.00 |
6 |
Bangkok Glass |
8 | 50% | 15 | 6 | 9 | 2.63 |
7 |
Foolad |
7 | 57% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1.14 |
8 |
Daegu |
8 | 50% | 16 | 7 | 9 | 2.88 |
9 |
Vissel Kobe |
7 | 57% | 18 | 11 | 7 | 4.14 |
10 |
Al Rayyan |
7 | 57% | 11 | 8 | 3 | 2.71 |
11 |
Ulsan |
7 | 57% | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3.43 |
12 |
Yokohama F. Marinos |
7 | 57% | 11 | 6 | 5 | 2.43 |
13 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
7 | 57% | 11 | 12 | -1 | 3.29 |
14 |
Melbourne City FC |
6 | 50% | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2.17 |
15 |
Nasaf |
8 | 38% | 10 | 7 | 3 | 2.13 |
16 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
6 | 50% | 17 | 4 | 13 | 3.50 |
17 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
7 | 29% | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3.57 |
18 |
Al Faisaly |
7 | 29% | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.43 |
19 |
Al Taawon |
7 | 29% | 14 | 13 | 1 | 3.86 |
20 |
Jeonnam Dragons |
6 | 33% | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.67 |
21 |
Al Sadd |
6 | 33% | 10 | 11 | -1 | 3.50 |
22 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
6 | 33% | 7 | 10 | -3 | 2.83 |
23 |
Kitchee |
5 | 40% | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3.40 |
24 |
Sepahan |
6 | 33% | 8 | 12 | -4 | 3.33 |
25 |
Home United |
6 | 33% | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3.67 |
26 |
Mumbai City |
6 | 33% | 3 | 11 | -8 | 2.33 |
27 |
Al Wihdat |
6 | 17% | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3.50 |
28 |
Al Sharjah |
7 | 14% | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2.86 |
29 |
Pakhtakor |
6 | 33% | 10 | 15 | -5 | 4.17 |
30 |
Sydney FC |
7 | 14% | 8 | 9 | -1 | 2.43 |
31 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
6 | 17% | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1.83 |
32 |
Al Gharafa |
6 | 17% | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3.50 |
33 |
Ahal |
6 | 17% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2.50 |
34 |
Al Jazira |
6 | 17% | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2.33 |
35 |
Istiqlol |
6 | 17% | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2.50 |
36 |
Al Jaish |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
37 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
38 |
Buriram United |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
39 |
Chiangrai United |
4 | 0% | 2 | 10 | -8 | 3.00 |
40 |
Shandong Luneng |
6 | 0% | 2 | 24 | -22 | 4.33 |
41 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
42 |
Melbourne Victory FC |
1 | 0% | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7.00 |
43 |
Bani Yas |
1 | 0% | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2.00 |
44 |
Port FC |
1 | 0% | 0 | 3 | -3 | 3.00 |
45 |
Kaya |
1 | 0% | 0 | 5 | -5 | 5.00 |
46 |
Ceres |
6 | 0% | 1 | 17 | -16 | 3.00 |
47 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
6 | 0% | 0 | 24 | -24 | 4.00 |
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Urawa Reds |
9 | 67% | 31 | 4 | 27 | 3.89 |
2 |
Al Shabab |
7 | 86% | 20 | 1 | 19 | 3.00 |
3 |
Jeonbuk Motors |
9 | 56% | 14 | 8 | 6 | 2.44 |
4 |
Al Hilal |
7 | 71% | 14 | 6 | 8 | 2.86 |
5 |
Al Duhail |
7 | 71% | 18 | 10 | 8 | 4.00 |
6 |
Bangkok Glass |
8 | 50% | 15 | 6 | 9 | 2.63 |
7 |
Foolad |
7 | 57% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1.14 |
8 |
Daegu |
8 | 50% | 16 | 7 | 9 | 2.88 |
9 |
Vissel Kobe |
7 | 57% | 18 | 11 | 7 | 4.14 |
10 |
Al Rayyan |
7 | 57% | 11 | 8 | 3 | 2.71 |
11 |
Ulsan |
7 | 57% | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3.43 |
12 |
Yokohama F. Marinos |
7 | 57% | 11 | 6 | 5 | 2.43 |
13 |
Johor Darul Ta'zim |
7 | 57% | 11 | 12 | -1 | 3.29 |
14 |
Melbourne City FC |
6 | 50% | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2.17 |
15 |
Nasaf |
8 | 38% | 10 | 7 | 3 | 2.13 |
16 |
Kawasaki Frontale |
6 | 50% | 17 | 4 | 13 | 3.50 |
17 |
Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
7 | 29% | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3.57 |
18 |
Al Faisaly |
7 | 29% | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.43 |
19 |
Al Taawon |
7 | 29% | 14 | 13 | 1 | 3.86 |
20 |
Jeonnam Dragons |
6 | 33% | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1.67 |
21 |
Al Sadd |
6 | 33% | 10 | 11 | -1 | 3.50 |
22 |
Al Quwa Al Jawiya |
6 | 33% | 7 | 10 | -3 | 2.83 |
23 |
Kitchee |
5 | 40% | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3.40 |
24 |
Sepahan |
6 | 33% | 8 | 12 | -4 | 3.33 |
25 |
Home United |
6 | 33% | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3.67 |
26 |
Mumbai City |
6 | 33% | 3 | 11 | -8 | 2.33 |
27 |
Al Wihdat |
6 | 17% | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3.50 |
28 |
Al Sharjah |
7 | 14% | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2.86 |
29 |
Pakhtakor |
6 | 33% | 10 | 15 | -5 | 4.17 |
30 |
Sydney FC |
7 | 14% | 8 | 9 | -1 | 2.43 |
31 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
6 | 17% | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1.83 |
32 |
Al Gharafa |
6 | 17% | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3.50 |
33 |
Ahal |
6 | 17% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2.50 |
34 |
Al Jazira |
6 | 17% | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2.33 |
35 |
Istiqlol |
6 | 17% | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2.50 |
36 |
Al Jaish |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
37 |
Al Zawra'a |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
38 |
Buriram United |
1 | 0% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.00 |
39 |
Chiangrai United |
4 | 0% | 2 | 10 | -8 | 3.00 |
40 |
Shandong Luneng |
6 | 0% | 2 | 24 | -22 | 4.33 |
41 |
Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
42 |
Melbourne Victory FC |
1 | 0% | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7.00 |
43 |
Bani Yas |
1 | 0% | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2.00 |
44 |
Port FC |
1 | 0% | 0 | 3 | -3 | 3.00 |
45 |
Kaya |
1 | 0% | 0 | 5 | -5 | 5.00 |
46 |
Ceres |
6 | 0% | 1 | 17 | -16 | 3.00 |
47 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
6 | 0% | 0 | 24 | -24 | 4.00 |
* Asia AFC Champions League Form Table is also available