Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Asia AFC Champions League
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - AFC Champions League
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Johor Darul Ta'zim FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 23 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Al Hilal FC Riyadh | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Al Ahli SC Jeddah | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Melbourne City FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Bangkok United FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Buriram United FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Tractor Sazi Tabriz FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Al Ittihad FC Jeddah | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 50% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai Club | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 17% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Al Gharafa SC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Gangwon FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Al Duhail SC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Al Sadd SC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Vissel Kobe | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Al Shorta | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 17% | |
| 23 | ![]() | FC Machida Zelvia | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Nasaf Qarshi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Seoul | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Al Sharjah SCC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
Johor Darul Ta'zim FC
is currently the most in form team in the AFC Champions League. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Al Hilal FC Riyadh
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Al Ahli SC Jeddah
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
FC Nasaf Qarshi
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.83 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FC Seoul
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.83 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Al Sharjah SCC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.67 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- AFC Champions League (Asia) Form Table consists of 26 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the AFC Champions League is Johor Darul Ta'zim FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the AFC Champions League is Al Sharjah SCC
Last 10 Form Table (AFC Champions League)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Al Hilal FC Riyadh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 7 | 18 | 30 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Johor Darul Ta'zim FC | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 6 | 33 | 28 |
| 2.80 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 30% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Al Ahli SC Jeddah | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Bangkok United FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Buriram United FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 15 | 14 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 8 | ![]() | Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| 9 | ![]() | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai Club | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | Vissel Kobe | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Melbourne City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 30% |
| 12 | ![]() | Tractor Sazi Tabriz FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 15 | ![]() | Al Gharafa SC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 16 | ![]() | Al Ittihad FC Jeddah | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Al Shorta | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Seoul | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Nasaf Qarshi | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Machida Zelvia | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | Al Sharjah SCC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Gangwon FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 50% | 40% | 30% |
| 25 | ![]() | Al Duhail SC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 26 | ![]() | Al Sadd SC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 23 | -3 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For AFC Champions League
• During the last 10 games, Al Hilal FC Riyadh have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the AFC Champions League just based on the last 10 matches.
• Johor Darul Ta'zim FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.8 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi, whose tally of 26 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.6 points per game. Can Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 AFC Champions League games, Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
• Al Sadd SC is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.8 points per game. This is the worst in the AFC Champions League. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (AFC Champions League)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Johor Darul Ta'zim FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 21 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Al Hilal FC Riyadh | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Melbourne City FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Al Ahli SC Jeddah | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Buriram United FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tractor Sazi Tabriz FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Bangkok United FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai Club | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Al Gharafa SC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Al Ittihad FC Jeddah | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Al Duhail SC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 17 | ![]() | Gangwon FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Al Sadd SC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Vissel Kobe | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Al Shorta | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Machida Zelvia | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | FC Seoul | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Al Sharjah SCC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Nasaf Qarshi | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Johor Darul Ta'zim FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Al Hilal FC Riyadh is on the same track as Johor Darul Ta'zim FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Melbourne City FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Bangkok United FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Al Sharjah SCC has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 1 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.8 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the AFC Champions League.
• Dangerously poor : FC Nasaf Qarshi's performance has statistically been the weakest in the AFC Champions League. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.4 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 9! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching FC Nasaf Qarshi play.
Home - Form Table (AFC Champions League)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Buriram United FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
| 3 | ![]() | Johor Darul Ta'zim FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Bangkok United FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Al Duhail SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Melbourne City FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai Club | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Al Hilal FC Riyadh | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Al Gharafa SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Al Ahli SC Jeddah | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Vissel Kobe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | ![]() | Tractor Sazi Tabriz FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Gangwon FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Seoul | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | FC Nasaf Qarshi | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Al Ittihad FC Jeddah | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Al Sadd SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Al Shorta | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Al Sharjah SCC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | FC Machida Zelvia | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Buriram United FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Chang Arena) with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium). With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the AFC Champions League home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Buriram United FC.
• Al Sharjah SCC's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Al-Sharjah Stadium). Al Sharjah SCC managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Al-Sharjah Stadium). Their average points per game is 1.5 making them the 2nd worst performing side in AFC Champions League at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. FC Machida Zelvia's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 2 losses, and just the 0.33 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, FC Machida Zelvia is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (AFC Champions League)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Al Ahli SC Jeddah | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Al Hilal FC Riyadh | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Al Wahda FC Abu Dhabi | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Johor Darul Ta'zim FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Foolad Mobarakeh Sepahan SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | ![]() | Melbourne City FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 7 | ![]() | Al Ittihad FC Jeddah | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tractor Sazi Tabriz FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Bangkok United FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Gangwon FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | FC Machida Zelvia | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai Club | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Al Sadd SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Al Gharafa SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Al Shorta | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Nasaf Qarshi | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Vissel Kobe | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Seoul | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Al Sharjah SCC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Buriram United FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Al Duhail SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Al Ahli SC Jeddah is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Al Ahli SC Jeddah have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the AFC Champions League.
• Al Duhail SC is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Asia
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


























