- FootyStats的足球统计数据
- ›
- 美国
- ›
- WPSL女子足球联赛
- ›
- 状态表
状态表 - WPSL女子足球联赛
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | 下一场球赛 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | 加利福尼亚 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 2 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% | N/A |
| 3 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago House AC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 9 | 33 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 31 | 6 | 25 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% | N/A |
| 12 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% | |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 14 | ![]() | 三藩市 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% | N/A |
| 15 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% | N/A |
| 17 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Davis FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 33% | N/A |
| 21 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% | |
| 22 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% | N/A |
| 23 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% | N/A |
| 24 | ![]() | Brooklyn City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| 25 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | N/A |
| 26 | ![]() | Fever Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% | |
| 27 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% | N/A |
| 28 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 25% | N/A |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | N/A |
| 30 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Erie FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | N/A |
| 32 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | N/A |
| 33 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 26 | -23 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 35 | ![]() | Yuba | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 17% | N/A |
| 36 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% | N/A |
| 37 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% | N/A |
| 38 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 60% | N/A |
| 43 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | N/A |
| 44 | ![]() | Kensington | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% | |
| 45 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% | N/A |
| 46 | ![]() | Glacier | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% | N/A |
| 47 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% | N/A |
| 48 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% | N/A |
| 49 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 31 | -28 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% | N/A |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 20 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
最近5场比赛状态表 (WPSL女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | Last 5 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | 加利福尼亚 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Chicago House AC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 100% | 20% | 0% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 5 | 37 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 25 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | 三藩市 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Brooklyn City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Fever Women | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 28 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Erie FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 20 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 34 | ![]() | Yuba | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 35 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 36 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 39 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 41 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 43 | ![]() | Kensington | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 44 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Glacier | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 48 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 49 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 21 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 20 | -19 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 80% |
根据Last 5 Form,哪些团队表现良好? - 表格指南
• 优异 :Salvo SC 在过去 5 场比赛中,每场比赛都获得3分,表现地非常出色。
• 非常好:Milwaukee Torrent FC Women与Salvo SC在同一级别上,在过去的5场比赛中,平均每场比赛都得2.6分。
• 相当不错:Chicago House AC 是过去 5 场比赛中表现最佳的球队中,排名第三的球队,4获胜,0失败,每场比赛平均获得2.6分。
• 表现普通:最近有几支球队表现平平。这包括Louisiana Krewe Rush Women,他们的4获胜、0平局和1失败,使他们本赛季到目前为止的场均得分为2.4分。
主场状态表 (WPSL女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | 加利福尼亚 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 17 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 22 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 15 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | 三藩市 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chicago House AC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 18 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Brooklyn City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Davis FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fever Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Glacier | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Yuba | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 38 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 22 | -21 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
| 39 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Erie FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Kensington | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 50 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 75% |
在主场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• 加利福尼亚在过去的6场主场比赛中,一直是主场表现最好的球队。有0场的败绩和4场的胜利。他们每场比赛的平均得分为2.6分,在所有俱乐部中排名最高。
• Little Rock Rangers 在他们的主场一直表现很出色。 4场的获胜,0场的平局和0局的失败。使他们在WPSL女子足球联赛的主场纪录表格中排名第二。每场比赛的平均得分为3分,几乎与加利福尼亚一样好。
客场状态表 (WPSL女子足球联赛)
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去6场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 第一队入球 | 两队都得分 | 高于2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | 加利福尼亚 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Austin Rise FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 3 | ![]() | Nashville Rhythm FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Little Rock Rangers | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Chicago House AC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | Milwaukee Torrent FC Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 8 | 17 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Albany Rush | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Davis FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Premier Women | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 10 | ![]() | Salvo SC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Minnesota Thunder | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Merrimack Valley Hawks FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | St Croix SC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Milwaukee Bavarian SC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Decatur FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | KICS Football Club | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Chattanooga FC Women | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Erie FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Louisiana Krewe Rush Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Middletown Sporting CT | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Connecticut Rush | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Brooklyn City FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | Portland Thorns FC II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Beach Futbol Club | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Fever Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Westside Timbers FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Yuba | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Tennessee Tempo FC Women | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Minnesota Dutch Lions FC Women | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Texas Lone Star | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Kensington | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 32 | ![]() | The Futbol Collective | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | So Cal Union FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Colorado Elevation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Fort Worth Vaqueras FC Women | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 36 | ![]() | San Francisco Glens SC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Atlanta Fire United | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | San Diego Parceiro LFC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Hattiesburg FC Women | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20 | -18 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 40 | ![]() | 三藩市 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Penn Fusion SA | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | FC Dallas Women | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Niagara 1812 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Mankato United SC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | 865 Alliance | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Fresno Freeze FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Force FC New York | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Glacier | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Philadelphia Ukrainian Nationals Liberty | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 | ![]() | Inter CT FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
在客场表现的最好和最差的球队是哪一队?
• 加利福尼亚在客场比赛中表现出色。他们在最近6场客场比赛中,都取得了3场的胜利。加利福尼亚获得了9分,这使他们成为WPSL女子足球联赛的客场比赛中,表现最好的球队。
状态表 - 美国
美国职业足球大联盟 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
美国足球冠军联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
美国足球冠军乙级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
国家女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
美国足球乙级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
美国足球冠军甲级联赛 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
美国公开杯 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
NPSL国家足球超级联赛 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
WPSL女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
国家独立足球协会 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
国家女子足球联赛挑战杯 状态表
- 组别 1
- 组别 1
国家女子足球联赛秋季 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
UWS女子足球联赛 状态表
- 组别 2
- 组别 2
USL W League 状态表
- 组别 4
- 组别 4
MLS Next Pro 状态表
- 组别 3
- 组别 3
Leagues Cup 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
MLS All Star 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯
USL Cup 状态表
- 赛杯
- 赛杯


















































