Loading
Kirkley & Pakefield FC vs Ipswich Wanderers FCStats, H2H & xG
Kirkley & Pakefield vs Ipswich Wanderers's head to head record shows that in the previous 2 meetings, Kirkley & Pakefield has won 0 times, Ipswich Wanderers has won 1 times, and 1 ended in a draw. Kirkley & Pakefield scored 0 goals and Ipswich Wanderers scored 1 goals in these matches.
Kirkley & Pakefield v Ipswich Wanderers Past H2H Results & Fixtures
*Kirkley & Pakefield FC and Ipswich Wanderers FC's average prediction data across current season
Kirkley & Pakefield FC
England - Counties Leagues Eastern Counties LeagueRecent : 2 Wins / 1 Draws / 3 Losses
- L
- W
- L
- W
- D
- L
- W
- W
- L
- L
- D
Ipswich Wanderers FC
England - Counties Leagues Eastern Counties LeagueRecent : 4 Wins / 0 Draws / 1 Losses
- W
- W
- L
- W
- W
- W
- W
- W
- L
- W
Ipswich Wanderers is +9% better in terms of Goals Scored
Kirkley & Pakefield at Home
Ipswich Wanderers at Away
| Scored Per Game | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 | 50% | 80% |
| Over 2.5 | 17% | 20% |
| Over 3.5 | 17% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 0% | 0% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 50% | 75% |
| Scored in 2H | 50% | 50% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 0% | 25% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0.67 | 1.25 |
| Scored Average 2H | 1.17 | 0.50 |
* Stats include both home and away games that Kirkley & Pakefield FC and Ipswich Wanderers FC have played.
Ipswich Wanderers is +48% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Kirkley & Pakefield at Home
Ipswich Wanderers at Away
| Conceded / Game | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 83% | 40% |
| Over 1.5 | 67% | 40% |
| Over 2.5 | 67% | 20% |
| Over 3.5 | 17% | 20% |
| Clean Sheets | 17% | 60% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 33% | 75% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 50% | 75% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 1 | 0.5 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 1.33 | 0.50 |
* Goals conceded data include both home and away games that Kirkley & Pakefield FC and Ipswich Wanderers FC have played.
UNLOCKCorners / Match
* Average Corner Kicks per match between Kirkley & Pakefield and Ipswich Wanderers
| Match Corners | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 6 | |||
| Over 7 | |||
| Over 8 | |||
| Over 9 | |||
| Over 10 | |||
| Over 11 | |||
| Over 12 | |||
| Over 13 |
| First Half | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH Average | |||
| FH Over 4 | |||
| FH Over 5 | |||
| FH Over 6 |
| Second Half | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2H Average | |||
| 2H Over 4 | |||
| 2H Over 5 | |||
| 2H Over 6 |
Total Match Corners for Kirkley & Pakefield FC and Ipswich Wanderers FC. League AVG is England Counties Leagues Eastern Counties League's average across 53 matches in the 2025/2026 season.
England Counties Leagues Eastern Counties League Corner Stats
100%
Medium Chance
60%
17%
High Chance
100%
* Sum of bookings per match between Kirkley & Pakefield and Ipswich Wanderers
| Match Cards | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Over 3.5 | |||
| Over 4.5 | |||
| Over 5.5 | |||
| Over 6.5 |
| Team Cards | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cards For Average | |||
| Over 0.5 For | |||
| Over 1.5 For | |||
| Over 2.5 For | |||
| Over 3.5 For |
| Cards Against | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 Against | |||
| Over 1.5 Against | |||
| Over 2.5 Against | |||
| Over 3.5 Against |
Total Match Cards for Kirkley & Pakefield FC and Ipswich Wanderers FC. League AVG is England Counties Leagues Eastern Counties League's average. There were 0 cards in 53 matches in the 2025/2026 season.
England Counties Leagues Eastern Counties League Card StatsKirkley & Pakefield33%
Scored first in 2 / 6 matches
Ipswich Wanderers80%
Scored first in 4 / 5 matches
Goals By Minute
Kirkley & Pakefield and Ipswich Wanderers's goals by 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
| 10 Mins | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 12% | 25% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 8% | 6% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 4% | 6% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 8% | 6% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 12% | 6% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 12% | 0% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 16% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 8% | 13% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 20% | 6% |
| 15 Mins | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 12% | 31% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 12% | 6% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 16% | 6% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 16% | 6% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 20% | 6% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 24% | 13% |
| Scored (10 min) | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 9% | 30% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 0% | 10% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 9% | 10% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 9% | 0% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 18% | 0% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 0% | 0% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 27% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 9% | 10% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 18% | 10% |
| Scored (15 min) | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 9% | 40% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 9% | 10% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 18% | 0% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 9% | 0% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 27% | 0% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 27% | 20% |
| Conceded (10 min) | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 14% | 17% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 14% | 0% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 0% | 0% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 7% | 17% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 7% | 17% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 21% | 0% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 7% | 0% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 7% | 17% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 21% | 0% |
| Conceded (15 min) | Kirkley & Pakefield | Ipswich Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 14% | 17% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 14% | 0% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 14% | 17% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 21% | 17% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 14% | 17% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 21% | 0% |
45' and 90' includes injury time goals.
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Fakenham Town |
6 | 83% | 23 | 6 | 17 | 15 | 4.83 |
2 |
Stowmarket Town |
6 | 83% | 15 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 4.67 |
3 |
Thetford Town FC |
7 | 57% | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 2.71 |
4 |
Mulbarton Wanderers FC |
5 | 80% | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 3.40 |
5 |
Ipswich Wanderers |
5 | 80% | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 3.20 |
6 |
Ely City |
5 | 60% | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 2.40 |
7 |
Great Yarmouth Town FC |
7 | 43% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 10 | 2.14 |
8 |
Soham Town Rangers |
5 | 60% | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 3.20 |
9 |
Walsham Le Willows |
6 | 33% | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 2.83 |
10 |
Haverhill Rovers |
5 | 60% | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 2.60 |
11 |
Dereham Town |
7 | 29% | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 2.57 |
12 |
Kirkley & Pakefield |
6 | 33% | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 | 4.17 |
13 |
Harleston Town |
7 | 14% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 | 2.14 |
14 |
Lakenheath |
6 | 17% | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 | 3.00 |
15 |
Hadleigh United |
6 | 17% | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 | 3.50 |
16 |
Cornard United FC |
6 | 17% | 9 | 17 | -8 | 4 | 4.33 |
17 |
Heacham |
5 | 0% | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 | 3.60 |
18 |
Woodbridge Town FC |
6 | 0% | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 | 3.50 |
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Fakenham Town |
6 | 83% | 23 | 6 | 17 | 15 | 4.83 |
2 |
Stowmarket Town |
6 | 83% | 15 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 4.67 |
3 |
Thetford Town FC |
7 | 57% | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 2.71 |
4 |
Mulbarton Wanderers FC |
5 | 80% | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 3.40 |
5 |
Ipswich Wanderers |
5 | 80% | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 3.20 |
6 |
Ely City |
5 | 60% | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 2.40 |
7 |
Great Yarmouth Town FC |
7 | 43% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 10 | 2.14 |
8 |
Soham Town Rangers |
5 | 60% | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 3.20 |
9 |
Walsham Le Willows |
6 | 33% | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 2.83 |
10 |
Haverhill Rovers |
5 | 60% | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 2.60 |
11 |
Dereham Town |
7 | 29% | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 2.57 |
12 |
Kirkley & Pakefield |
6 | 33% | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 | 4.17 |
13 |
Harleston Town |
7 | 14% | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 | 2.14 |
14 |
Lakenheath |
6 | 17% | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 | 3.00 |
15 |
Hadleigh United |
6 | 17% | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 | 3.50 |
16 |
Cornard United FC |
6 | 17% | 9 | 17 | -8 | 4 | 4.33 |
17 |
Heacham |
5 | 0% | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 | 3.60 |
18 |
Woodbridge Town FC |
6 | 0% | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 | 3.50 |
* England Counties Leagues Eastern Counties League Form Table is also available