Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Peru Segunda División
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Segunda División
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | |
| 5 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Sport Huancayo II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Unión Minas Volcán | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | CD Bentín Tacna Heroica | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | CD Estudiantil CNI (Loreto) | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | AD Comerciantes FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | FC San Marcos Peru | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 83% | - |
Santos de Nasca FC
is currently the most in form team in the Segunda División. They picked up an average of 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
CSD Carlos A. Manucci
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
CD Universidad San Martín de Porres
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
FC San Marcos Peru
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Segunda División (Peru) Form Table consists of 18 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Segunda División is Santos de Nasca FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Segunda División is Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional
Last 10 Form Table (Segunda División)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 30% |
| 2 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Club Sport Huancayo II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Unión Minas Volcán | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 10 | ![]() | CD Bentín Tacna Heroica | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | AD Comerciantes FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | CD Estudiantil CNI (Loreto) | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 47 | -41 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC San Marcos Peru | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 21 | -21 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 30% | 100% | 0% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Segunda División
• During the last 10 games, Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria have been doing really well with 2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Segunda División just based on the last 10 matches.
• CSD Carlos A. Manucci is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 1.9 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are CD Universidad San Martín de Porres, whose tally of 19 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.9 points per game. Can CD Universidad San Martín de Porres improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Segunda División games, CD Bentín Tacna Heroica fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. CD Bentín Tacna Heroica is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 3 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses.
• FC San Marcos Peru is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.3 points per game. This is the worst in the Segunda División. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Segunda División)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Unión Minas Volcán | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | CD Bentín Tacna Heroica | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Sport Huancayo II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | CD Estudiantil CNI (Loreto) | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | AD Comerciantes FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC San Marcos Peru | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 60% | 100% | 0% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : CD Universidad San Martín de Porres is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : CD Universidad César Vallejo is on the same track as CD Universidad San Martín de Porres with an average of of 2.2 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Ayacucho FC, whose 2 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.4 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.4 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Segunda División.
• Dangerously poor : Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Segunda División. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 3 goals and conceded 8! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad play.
Home - Form Table (Segunda División)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Unión Minas Volcán | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | CD Bentín Tacna Heroica | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club Sport Huancayo II | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | CD Estudiantil CNI (Loreto) | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 17% |
| 16 | ![]() | AD Comerciantes FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC San Marcos Peru | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 15 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 100% | 0% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Unión Minas Volcán has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• CD Unión Comercio has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Estadio IPD de Nueva Cajamarca). With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Segunda División home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Unión Minas Volcán.
• Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (). Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (). Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Segunda División at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. FC San Marcos Peru's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, FC San Marcos Peru is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Segunda División)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Asociación Deportiva Agropecuaria | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 17% |
| 4 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Club Sport Huancayo II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Unión Minas Volcán | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | AD Comerciantes FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | CD Bentín Tacna Heroica | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | FC San Marcos Peru | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | CD Estudiantil CNI (Loreto) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 38 | -36 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• CSD Carlos A. Manucci is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. CSD Carlos A. Manucci have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Segunda División.
• Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Peru
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff


















