Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Peru Copa Bicentenario
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Copa Bicentenario
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 50% | 0% | 17% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 20 | -16 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
Club Alianza Atlético Sullana
is currently the most in form team in the Copa Bicentenario. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
CD Sport Huancayo
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
CSD Carlos A. Manucci
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Club Centro Deportivo Municipal
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Copa Bicentenario (Peru) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Copa Bicentenario is Club Alianza Atlético Sullana
- The team with the worst form currently in the Copa Bicentenario is CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca
Last 10 Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 30% |
| 9 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 50% | 20% | 10% |
| 14 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 70% | 50% | 20% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 24 | -14 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 70% | 30% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 43 | -37 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 80% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Copa Bicentenario
• During the last 10 games, Club Alianza Atlético Sullana have been doing really well with 2.2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Copa Bicentenario just based on the last 10 matches.
• CD Sport Huancayo is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are CSD Carlos A. Manucci, whose tally of 20 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2 points per game. Can CSD Carlos A. Manucci improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Copa Bicentenario games, FBC Melgar fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. FBC Melgar is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses.
• CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.2 points per game. This is the worst in the Copa Bicentenario. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 0% | 20% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : CD Sport Huancayo is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : CSD Carlos A. Manucci is on the same track as CD Sport Huancayo with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Club Sporting Cristal SAC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Club Universitario de Deportes, whose 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.6 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Copa Bicentenario.
• Dangerously poor : Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Copa Bicentenario. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 5 goals and conceded 13! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo play.
Home - Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• CD Universidad San Martín de Porres has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Estadio Miguel Grau del Callao) with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• CSD Carlos A. Manucci has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Estadio Mario Orezzole). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Copa Bicentenario home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as CD Universidad San Martín de Porres.
• Club Centro Deportivo Municipal's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Estadio Municipal Iván Elías Moreno). Club Centro Deportivo Municipal managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Estadio Municipal Iván Elías Moreno). Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Copa Bicentenario at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 3 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 8 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 15 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 21 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 25 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 18 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• CD Sport Huancayo is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. CD Sport Huancayo have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Copa Bicentenario.
• CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Peru
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























