Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Peru Copa Bicentenario
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Copa Bicentenario
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 33% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 31 | -28 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 17 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
Club Alianza Atlético Sullana
is currently the most in form team in the Copa Bicentenario. They picked up an average of 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Club Universitario de Deportes
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Club Sporting Cristal SAC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Los Chankas
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FC Carlos Stein
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Copa Bicentenario (Peru) Form Table consists of 30 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Copa Bicentenario is Club Alianza Atlético Sullana
- The team with the worst form currently in the Copa Bicentenario is CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca
Last 10 Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 3 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 70% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 6 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 50% | 30% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 30% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 23 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 25 | -13 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
| 24 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 39 | -33 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
| 25 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 24 | -17 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 | 24 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
| 30 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 25 | -22 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 10% | 70% | 30% | 50% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Copa Bicentenario
• During the last 10 games, CSD Carlos A. Manucci have been doing really well with 2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Copa Bicentenario just based on the last 10 matches.
• Club Universitario de Deportes is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are CD Unión Comercio, whose tally of 19 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 5 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.9 points per game. Can CD Unión Comercio improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Copa Bicentenario games, Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses.
• FC Carlos Stein is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.1 points per game. This is the worst in the Copa Bicentenario. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 11 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 12 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 14 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 20 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 22 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 22 | -19 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 25 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Club Alianza Atlético Sullana is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : CD Sport Huancayo is on the same track as Club Alianza Atlético Sullana with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : CSD Carlos A. Manucci is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Copa Bicentenario.
• Dangerously poor : Los Chankas's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Copa Bicentenario. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 17! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Los Chankas play.
Home - Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• CD Universidad San Martín de Porres has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Estadio Miguel Grau del Callao) with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Club Sporting Cristal SAC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Estadio Alberto Gallardo). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Copa Bicentenario home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as CD Universidad San Martín de Porres.
• CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Estadio Héroes de San Ramón). CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Estadio Héroes de San Ramón). Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Copa Bicentenario at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Los Chankas's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Los Chankas is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Copa Bicentenario)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Club Universitario de Deportes | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Asociación Civil Real Atlético Garcilaso | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | CD Sport Huancayo | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | FBC Melgar | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Club Alianza Atlético Sullana | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | CD Unión Comercio | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | CSD Carlos A. Manucci | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | CD Universidad César Vallejo | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 9 | ![]() | Club Unión Huaral | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | CD Comerciantes Unidos | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 11 | ![]() | Club Sporting Cristal SAC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Molinos El Pirata FC | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Club Atlético Grau | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Club Cienciano | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 15 | ![]() | Club Social Deportivo Alianza Universidad | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 16 | ![]() | Sport Boys Association | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Club Alianza Lima | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Coopsol | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Club Deportivo Llacuabamba | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Club Centro Deportivo Municipal | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Los Chankas | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | FC Carlos Stein | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
| 23 | ![]() | CD Universidad San Martín de Porres | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Santos de Nasca FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Ayacucho FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Club Juan Aurich de Chiclayo | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Academia Deportiva Cantolao | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Escuela Municipal Deportivo Binacional | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 23 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sport Chavelines Juniors de Pacasmayo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Club Universitario de Deportes is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Club Universitario de Deportes have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Copa Bicentenario.
• CCyD Universidad Técnica de Cajamarca is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Peru
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff






























