Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2. Division
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2. Division
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 19 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 17% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | ![]() |
Sandnes Ulf
is currently the most in form team in the 2. Division. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Ullensaker - Kisa IL
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Sotra SK
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Strindheim TF
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Asker Fotball
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Sandviken IL
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2. Division (Norway) Form Table consists of 28 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2. Division is Sandnes Ulf
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2. Division is Sandviken IL
Last 10 Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 8 | 24 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
3 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 19 | 4 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
5 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 26 | 16 | 10 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
6 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
9 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 20 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 22 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 70% |
17 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Follo FK | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
22 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 24 | -14 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
24 | ![]() | Rana FK | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
25 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 27 | -14 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Alta IF | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 30 | -19 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 25 | -14 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2. Division
• During the last 10 games, Sandnes Ulf have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2. Division just based on the last 10 matches.
• Sotra SK is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Strømmen IF, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Strømmen IF improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 2. Division games, FK Jerv fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. FK Jerv is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses.
• Sandviken IL is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.5 points per game. This is the worst in the 2. Division. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
4 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
9 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0% |
12 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Rana FK | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
17 | ![]() | Follo FK | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
19 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Alta IF | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
26 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Sandnes Ulf is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Eidsvold TF is on the same track as Sandnes Ulf with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Strømmen IF is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Hønefoss BK, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Sandviken IL has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.2 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the 2. Division.
• Dangerously poor : Asker Fotball's performance has statistically been the weakest in the 2. Division. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 4 goals and conceded 19! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Asker Fotball play.
Home - Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 3 | 15 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
3 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
8 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
9 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
18 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
20 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
23 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
24 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
26 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
28 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Eidsvold TF has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Eidsvoll kunstgress) with 1 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Sandnes Ulf has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Sandnes Idrettspark). With 4 wins, 2 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2. Division home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.33 which is nearly as good as Eidsvold TF.
• SK Vard Haugesund's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Haugesund Stadion). SK Vard Haugesund managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Haugesund Stadion). Their average points per game is 1 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2. Division at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Asker Fotball's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0.83 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Asker Fotball is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% |
3 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
8 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
9 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
10 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
12 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 33% |
16 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
19 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
20 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
21 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
25 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
26 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
27 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
28 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Sotra SK is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Sotra SK have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2. Division.
• Alta IF is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff