Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2. Division
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2. Division
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 50% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
18 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
22 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
25 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
Rana FK
is currently the most in form team in the 2. Division. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Brattvåg IL
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Pors Grenland
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Follo FK
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Flekkerøy IL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Strindheim TF
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2. Division (Norway) Form Table consists of 28 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2. Division is Rana FK
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2. Division is Strindheim TF
Last 10 Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 9 | 21 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
4 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
5 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
8 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 16 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Rana FK | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
15 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
16 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 25 | 23 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Alta IF | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 22 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 10 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 70% |
21 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Follo FK | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 23 | -13 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 29 | -12 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 100% |
25 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 40% |
26 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 28 | -17 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2. Division
• During the last 10 games, Sandnes Ulf have been doing really well with 2.3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2. Division just based on the last 10 matches.
• Sotra SK is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Strømmen IF, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Strømmen IF improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 2. Division games, Lysekloster IL fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Lysekloster IL is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses.
• Strindheim TF is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.4 points per game. This is the worst in the 2. Division. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
2 | ![]() | Rana FK | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
5 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
12 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Alta IF | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
18 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
19 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
22 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
23 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
24 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Follo FK | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : FK Jerv is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Rana FK is on the same track as FK Jerv with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Pors Grenland is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Grorud IL, whose 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.8 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Strindheim TF has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.2 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the 2. Division.
• Dangerously poor : Flekkerøy IL's performance has statistically been the weakest in the 2. Division. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 3 goals and conceded 13! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Flekkerøy IL play.
Home - Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
2 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
6 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
14 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
15 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 17% |
18 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
20 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% |
23 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
26 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
27 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Eidsvold TF has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Eidsvoll kunstgress) with 0 losses and 5 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.67.
• Ullensaker - Kisa IL has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 5 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2. Division home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Eidsvold TF.
• SK Brann II's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. SK Brann II managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2. Division at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Strindheim TF's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 1 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.67 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Strindheim TF is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2. Division)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Ullensaker - Kisa IL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | Strømmen IF | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
5 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Grorud IL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Eidsvold TF | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% |
10 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
12 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Levanger FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Hønefoss BK | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | IL Stjørdals-Blink | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Kjelsås Fotball | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Tromsdalen UIL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% |
19 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Rana FK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Asker Fotball | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Follo FK | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
24 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Strindheim TF | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 24 | -17 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
27 | ![]() | Alta IF | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Sotra SK is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Sotra SK have the highest points tally with 14 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2. Division.
• Flekkerøy IL is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff