Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2 Division Group 1
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2 Division Group 1
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 9 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% |
Idrettslaget Bjarg
is currently the most in form team in the 2 Division Group 1. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Mjøndalen IF
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
FK Jerv
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Sportsklubben Træff
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.83 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Notodden FK
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Kvik Halden FK
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2 Division Group 1 (Norway) Form Table consists of 14 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2 Division Group 1 is Idrettslaget Bjarg
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2 Division Group 1 is Kvik Halden FK
Last 10 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 31 | 11 | 20 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 70% |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 15 | 11 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 24 | -11 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 8 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 26 | -16 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 30% | 70% | 10% | 30% |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2 Division Group 1
• During the last 10 games, Idrettslaget Bjarg have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2 Division Group 1 just based on the last 10 matches.
• FK Jerv is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Mjøndalen IF, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can Mjøndalen IF improve and top the table soon?
Last 5 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Idrettslaget Bjarg is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Mjøndalen IF is on the same track as Idrettslaget Bjarg with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Brattvåg IL is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
Home - Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 5 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 9 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 14 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 83% | 17% | 17% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Sotra SK has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Straume stadion) with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• FK Jerv has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (J.J. Ugland Stadion - Levermyr). With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2 Division Group 1 home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Sotra SK.
• Lysekloster IL's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Lysekloster Framo Idrettsplass). Lysekloster IL managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Lysekloster Framo Idrettsplass). Their average points per game is 0.33 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2 Division Group 1 at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Kvik Halden FK's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 1 draws, 5 losses, and just the 0.17 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Kvik Halden FK is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 8 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% |
| 13 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Idrettslaget Bjarg is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Idrettslaget Bjarg have the highest points tally with 16 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2 Division Group 1.
• FK Eik Tønsberg is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 1 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 3
- Division 3














