Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2 Division Group 1
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2 Division Group 1
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 83% | |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | |
| 5 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 9 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
Brattvåg IL
is currently the most in form team in the 2 Division Group 1. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Kvik Halden FK
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
FK Vidar
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Sandviken IL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 1 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Notodden FK
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.83 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Lysekloster IL
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2 Division Group 1 (Norway) Form Table consists of 14 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2 Division Group 1 is Brattvåg IL
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2 Division Group 1 is Lysekloster IL
Last 10 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 2 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 8 | 30 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 13 | 21 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
| 4 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 20 | 13 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 9 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 24 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
| 12 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 26 | -15 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 14 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2 Division Group 1
• During the last 10 games, Kvik Halden FK have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2 Division Group 1 just based on the last 10 matches.
• Brattvåg IL is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Idrettslaget Bjarg, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can Idrettslaget Bjarg improve and top the table soon?
Last 5 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 8 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Idrettslaget Bjarg is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Brattvåg IL is on the same track as Idrettslaget Bjarg with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : FK Eik Tønsberg is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
Home - Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 6 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 7 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
| 11 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Arendal Fotball has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Norac Stadion) with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Brattvåg IL has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Brattvåg kunstgress). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2 Division Group 1 home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Arendal Fotball.
• Notodden FK's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Idrettsparken). Notodden FK managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Idrettsparken). Their average points per game is 1 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2 Division Group 1 at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Lysekloster IL's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Lysekloster IL is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• FK Vidar is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 2 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. FK Vidar have the highest points tally with 7 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2 Division Group 1.
• Sandviken IL is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 3
- Division 3














