Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2 Division Group 1

- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2 Division Group 1
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 18 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
Sandnes Ulf
is currently the most in form team in the 2 Division Group 1. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Brattvåg IL
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.FK Jerv
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 1.83 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.SK Vard Haugesund
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.83 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Flekkerøy IL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Lysekloster IL
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.5 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2 Division Group 1 (Norway) Form Table consists of 14 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2 Division Group 1 is Sandnes Ulf
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2 Division Group 1 is Lysekloster IL
Last 10 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
4 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 30% |
7 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
8 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 29 | -22 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2 Division Group 1
• During the last 10 games, Brattvåg IL have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2 Division Group 1 just based on the last 10 matches.
• Sandnes Ulf is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Sandviken IL, whose tally of 17 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 5 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.7 points per game. Can Sandviken IL improve and top the table soon?
Last 5 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
4 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
6 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
9 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
10 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
12 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
13 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 15 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Sandnes Ulf is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Brattvåg IL is on the same track as Sandnes Ulf with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : FK Eik Tønsberg is the 3rd most well performing team with 2 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 1.6 points per game.
Home - Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
2 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 16 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% |
4 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 17% |
8 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Brattvåg IL has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Brattvåg kunstgress) with 0 losses and 6 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Arendal Fotball has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Norac Stadion). With 5 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2 Division Group 1 home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.67 which is nearly as good as Brattvåg IL.
• Flekkerøy IL's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (Arkicon Arena Flekkerøy). Flekkerøy IL managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (Arkicon Arena Flekkerøy). Their average points per game is 0.83 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2 Division Group 1 at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Notodden FK's performances have been terrible at home. With 1 wins, 1 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.67 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Notodden FK is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Sandnes Ulf | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
3 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
6 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% |
7 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 17% |
9 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
11 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | SK Brann II | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | SK Vard Haugesund | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Flekkerøy IL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 20 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Sandnes Ulf is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Sandnes Ulf have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2 Division Group 1.
• Flekkerøy IL is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 3