Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Norway 2 Division Group 1
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - 2 Division Group 1
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 20 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 21 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Arendal Fotball
is currently the most in form team in the 2 Division Group 1. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Mjøndalen IF
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Notodden FK
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Sandviken IL
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FK Vidar
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FK Eik Tønsberg
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- 2 Division Group 1 (Norway) Form Table consists of 14 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the 2 Division Group 1 is Arendal Fotball
- The team with the worst form currently in the 2 Division Group 1 is FK Eik Tønsberg
Last 10 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 3 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 5 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 9 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 10 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 22 | -14 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 29 | -17 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
Last 10 Form Guide For 2 Division Group 1
• During the last 10 games, Mjøndalen IF have been doing really well with 2.2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the 2 Division Group 1 just based on the last 10 matches.
• FK Jerv is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Notodden FK, whose tally of 19 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 1.9 points per game. Can Notodden FK improve and top the table soon?
Last 5 Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 6 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Arendal Fotball is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Notodden FK is on the same track as Arendal Fotball with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Mjøndalen IF is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
Home - Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% |
| 3 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% |
| 7 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% |
| 12 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Mjøndalen IF has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Consto Arena) with 1 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.17.
• FK Jerv has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (J.J. Ugland Stadion - Levermyr). With 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the 2 Division Group 1 home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.17 which is nearly as good as Mjøndalen IF.
• FK Eik Tønsberg's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (). FK Eik Tønsberg managed to get just 1 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (). Their average points per game is 0.67 making them the 2nd worst performing side in 2 Division Group 1 at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Lysekloster IL's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 2 draws, 4 losses, and just the 0.33 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Lysekloster IL is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (2 Division Group 1)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Notodden FK | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Mjøndalen IF | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | FK Jerv | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 83% |
| 4 | ![]() | Brattvåg IL | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Pors Grenland | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Kvik Halden FK | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Idrettslaget Bjarg | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Arendal Fotball | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Sotra SK | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Sportsklubben Træff | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Lysekloster IL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Sandviken IL | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | FK Vidar | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 83% |
| 14 | ![]() | FK Eik Tønsberg | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Notodden FK is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 5 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Notodden FK have the highest points tally with 15 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the 2 Division Group 1.
• FK Eik Tønsberg is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Norway
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Division 4
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 3
- Division 3














