Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Estonia II liiga
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - II liiga
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | FCI Tallinn | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 3 | 24 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Vaprus II | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Viljandi JK Tulevik | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Nõmme Kalju FC U21 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
8 | ![]() | FC Helios | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | FC Puuma | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Keila JK | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
14 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Saku Sporting | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
17 | ![]() | Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 24 | -13 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
18 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 30 | -23 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
FCI Tallinn
is currently the most in form team in the II liiga. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Pärnu JK Vaprus II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Viljandi JK Tulevik
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Viimsi MRJK II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 1 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 1 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- II liiga (Estonia) Form Table consists of 18 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the II liiga is FCI Tallinn
- The team with the worst form currently in the II liiga is Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana
Last 10 Form Table (II liiga)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | FCI Tallinn | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 6 | 30 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 90% |
2 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Vaprus II | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 9 | 22 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | FC Puuma | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 20 | 16 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 90% |
4 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | FC Helios | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Nõmme Kalju FC U21 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 27 | -4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
10 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
11 | ![]() | Viljandi JK Tulevik | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
12 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 32 | -17 | 9 |
| 1.13 | 13% | 38% | 50% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 25 | -8 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Keila JK | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% |
17 | ![]() | Saku Sporting | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 34 | -18 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 12 | 45 | -33 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
Last 10 Form Guide For II liiga
• During the last 10 games, FCI Tallinn have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the II liiga just based on the last 10 matches.
• Pärnu JK Vaprus II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are FC Puuma, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 3 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can FC Puuma improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 II liiga games, Viimsi MRJK II fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Viimsi MRJK II is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses.
• Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0.2 points per game. This is the worst in the II liiga. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (II liiga)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | FCI Tallinn | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Vaprus II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Viljandi JK Tulevik | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
6 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Nõmme Kalju FC U21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | FC Helios | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
10 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Saku Sporting | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | FC Puuma | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Keila JK | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
14 | ![]() | Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
18 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 29 | -23 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : FCI Tallinn is doing exceptionally well with 2.4 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Rakvere JK Tarvas is on the same track as FCI Tallinn with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Pärnu JK Vaprus II is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes FA Tartu Kalev II, whose 2 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.4 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Viimsi MRJK II has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 1 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0.6 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the II liiga.
• Dangerously poor : Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana's performance has statistically been the weakest in the II liiga. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0.2 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 6 goals and conceded 29! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana play.
Home - Form Table (II liiga)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Vaprus II | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
2 | ![]() | FCI Tallinn | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | Viljandi JK Tulevik | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% |
8 | ![]() | Keila JK | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Nõmme Kalju FC U21 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | FC Puuma | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | FC Helios | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Saku Sporting | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
18 | ![]() | Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Pärnu JK Vaprus II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.4.
• FCI Tallinn has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Lasnamäe Kergejõustikuhalli kunstmuruväljak). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the II liiga home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Pärnu JK Vaprus II.
• Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium (). Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue (). Their average points per game is 0.67 making them the 2nd worst performing side in II liiga at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 1 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (II liiga)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
2 | ![]() | FC Helios | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Kohtla-Järve Linnameeskond | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Nõmme Kalju FC U21 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Viljandi JK Tulevik | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | FCI Tallinn | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | FC Puuma | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
8 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Saku Sporting | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
12 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Vaprus II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
14 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Keila JK | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
17 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• FC Flora Tallinn III is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. FC Flora Tallinn III have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the II liiga.
• Pärnu JK Poseidon Nirvaana is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Estonia
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff