Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Estonia II liiga
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - II liiga
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | FC Kuressaare II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% | |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Paide Linnameeskond U21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Saue JK Laagri | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Placet | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Keila JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Helios | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | |
| 15 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Läänemaa JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
FC Kuressaare II
is currently the most in form team in the II liiga. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Viimsi MRJK II
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Rakvere JK Tarvas
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F.
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
FA Tartu Kalev II
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Läänemaa JK
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- II liiga (Estonia) Form Table consists of 16 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the II liiga is FC Kuressaare II
- The team with the worst form currently in the II liiga is Läänemaa JK
Last 10 Form Table (II liiga)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | FC Kuressaare II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Paide Linnameeskond U21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Placet | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Saue JK Laagri | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 11 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Keila JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Helios | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Läänemaa JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For II liiga
• During the last 10 games, FC Kuressaare II have been doing really well with 3 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the II liiga just based on the last 10 matches.
• Viimsi MRJK II is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.33 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Rakvere JK Tarvas, whose tally of 7 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 2 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.33 points per game. Can Rakvere JK Tarvas improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 II liiga games, FC Flora Tallinn III fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. FC Flora Tallinn III is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 1 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (II liiga)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | FC Kuressaare II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Paide Linnameeskond U21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Saue JK Laagri | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 10 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Placet | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Keila JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 13 | ![]() | FC Helios | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Läänemaa JK | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : FC Kuressaare II is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Viimsi MRJK II is on the same track as FC Kuressaare II with an average of of 2.33 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Rakvere JK Tarvas is the 3rd most well performing team with 2 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.33 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes FC Flora Tallinn III, whose 1 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.33 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (II liiga)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 4 | ![]() | Placet | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Kuressaare II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Paide Linnameeskond U21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Saue JK Laagri | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Keila JK | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Läänemaa JK | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Helios | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Viimsi MRJK II has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 2 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.33.
• Tartu JK Welco II has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the II liiga home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Viimsi MRJK II.
• FC Helios's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. FC Helios managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in II liiga at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F.'s performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (II liiga)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | FC Kuressaare II | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | FC Hiiumaa | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Rakvere JK Tarvas | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Saue JK Laagri | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | FC Tallinn II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | ![]() | Paide Linnameeskond U21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | FC Flora Tallinn III | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tartu JK Welco II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | ![]() | Viimsi MRJK II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Placet | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Harju JK Laagri II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 | ![]() | Keila JK | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | FA Tartu Kalev II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Läänemaa JK | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | FC Helios | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• FC Kuressaare II is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 2 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. FC Kuressaare II have the highest points tally with 6 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the II liiga.
• Tabasalu Ulasabat C.F. is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Estonia
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 4
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 2
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
















