- FootyStats
- ›
- Philippines
- ›
- PFL
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - Philippines PFL
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - PFL
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Maharlika FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Manila Digger FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 25% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Kaya FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Davao Aguilas FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Stallion Laguna FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Azkals Development Team | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Dynamic Herb Cebu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Tuloy FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Mendiola FC 1991 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Maharlika FC
is currently the most in form team in the PFL. They picked up an average of 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Manila Digger FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Kaya FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.25 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Tuloy FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Mendiola FC 1991
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.67 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- PFL (Philippines) Form Table consists of 10 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the PFL is Maharlika FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the PFL is Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM
Last 10 Form Table (PFL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Manila Digger FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
| 2 | ![]() | Davao Aguilas FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Kaya FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Maharlika FC | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 43% |
| 5 | ![]() | Stallion Laguna FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 6 | ![]() | Dynamic Herb Cebu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Azkals Development Team | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 8 | ![]() | Mendiola FC 1991 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tuloy FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For PFL
• During the last 10 games, Maharlika FC have been doing really well with 2 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the PFL just based on the last 10 matches.
• Manila Digger FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Kaya FC, whose tally of 9 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.25 points per game. Can Kaya FC improve and top the table soon?
Last 5 Form Table (PFL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Manila Digger FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
| 2 | ![]() | Maharlika FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Kaya FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 75% |
| 4 | ![]() | Davao Aguilas FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Stallion Laguna FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 75% |
| 6 | ![]() | Azkals Development Team | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Dynamic Herb Cebu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tuloy FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Mendiola FC 1991 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Manila Digger FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Maharlika FC is on the same track as Manila Digger FC with an average of of 2 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Kaya FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.25 points per game.
Home - Form Table (PFL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Maharlika FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Manila Digger FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | ![]() | Azkals Development Team | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Kaya FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Davao Aguilas FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Stallion Laguna FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Mendiola FC 1991 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Dynamic Herb Cebu FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tuloy FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Maharlika FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Manila Digger FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the PFL home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Maharlika FC.
• Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in PFL at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Tuloy FC's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Tuloy FC is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (PFL)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Manila Digger FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Kaya FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Davao Aguilas FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Maharlika FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 | ![]() | Stallion Laguna FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Dynamic Herb Cebu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Tuloy FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | ![]() | Mendiola FC 1991 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 9 | ![]() | Azkals Development Team | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Manila Digger FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 2 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Manila Digger FC have the highest points tally with 6 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the PFL.
• Philippine Army Fritz and Macziol IBM is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - Philippines
- Division 1
- Cup or Playoff










