Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
2 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | - |
3 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
4 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | - |
5 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
7 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
9 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | - |
10 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | - |
11 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 33% | - |
12 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
13 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
14 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | - |
15 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
16 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
17 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 67% | - |
18 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
19 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
20 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
21 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
22 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
23 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
24 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
25 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
26 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 50% | - |
27 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
28 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 33% | - |
29 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
30 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
31 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
32 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
33 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
34 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
35 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
36 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
37 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
38 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
39 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | - |
41 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 17% | - |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
43 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() |
Shenzhen 2028 FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Shenyang Urban FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Chengdu Better City FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.17 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Winner Match 60
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 61
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 62
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 70 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Shenzhen 2028 FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Winner Match 62
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 30% |
4 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 30% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 30% |
9 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
16 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
18 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 30% |
19 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
27 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
28 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
32 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
34 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
36 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
37 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
38 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 40% |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 70% | 20% | 20% |
41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 30% | 60% | 30% | 40% |
42 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
43 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Shanghai Shenhua FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Guangxi Hengchen FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Shenzhen 2028 FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Shenzhen 2028 FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Yanbian Longding FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Yanbian Longding FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
4 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% |
10 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
18 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
19 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
21 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
23 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
27 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
29 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
31 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
32 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
35 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
36 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
37 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
38 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 80% |
41 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Guangxi Hengchen FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Shanghai Shenhua FC is on the same track as Guangxi Hengchen FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Shenyang Urban FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Yanbian Longding FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
2 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
9 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
10 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
13 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
16 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
20 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
22 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
24 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
26 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
35 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
36 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
37 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
41 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
42 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
43 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Yanbian Longding FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.4.
• Dalian Zhixing FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Yanbian Longding FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
15 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
23 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
27 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
30 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
32 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
33 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
36 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
37 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
40 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
41 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
43 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Tai'an Tiankuang FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Tai'an Tiankuang FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1