Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | - |
2 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | - |
3 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
4 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 83% | - |
5 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
6 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
7 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
8 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
9 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | - |
10 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
11 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
12 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
13 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
14 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
15 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | - |
16 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
17 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
18 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
19 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
20 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
21 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
22 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 33% | - |
23 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | - |
24 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
25 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
26 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
27 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
28 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
29 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
30 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
31 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | - |
32 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
33 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% | - |
34 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
35 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
36 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
37 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
38 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
39 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 17% | - |
40 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
41 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
42 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
43 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% | - |
Shanghai Shenhua FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.5 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Beijing Guoan FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Yunnan Yukun FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Winner Match 61
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 62
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Meizhou Hakka FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 70 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Shanghai Shenhua FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Meizhou Hakka FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 5 | 17 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
4 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 10% | 30% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 30% |
7 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 70% |
8 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
9 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
10 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
11 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
15 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
17 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
20 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
22 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
27 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 50% | 30% | 30% |
33 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
35 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
37 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
38 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
42 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 60% | 30% | 20% |
43 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
44 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Beijing Guoan FC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Guangxi Hengchen FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Chengdu Better City FC, whose tally of 25 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 8 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.5 points per game. Can Chengdu Better City FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Yanbian Longding FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Yanbian Longding FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
4 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
5 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
15 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
20 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
21 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
22 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
24 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
27 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
28 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
30 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
31 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
32 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
33 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
36 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
39 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
40 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Beijing Guoan FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Shanghai Shenhua FC is on the same track as Beijing Guoan FC with an average of of 2.4 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Yunnan Yukun FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Yanbian Longding FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
7 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
8 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
9 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
10 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
11 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
14 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
20 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
22 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
24 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
26 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
27 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
30 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
31 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
33 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
34 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
35 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
36 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
37 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
38 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
39 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
41 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Guangdong GZ-Power FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Shenzhen Jixiang FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 2 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 1.8 which is nearly as good as Guangdong GZ-Power FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
3 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
4 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
5 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
15 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
17 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
18 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
20 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
25 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
26 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
28 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
29 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
32 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
33 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
34 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
37 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
40 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
47 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
48 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Yunnan Yukun FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Yunnan Yukun FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3