Form Table - Last 5/6/10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
2 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 33% | ![]() |
3 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
4 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 15 |
| 2.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
6 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 17% | ![]() |
7 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
8 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | ![]() |
9 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
11 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | ![]() |
12 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | ![]() |
13 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 50% | - |
14 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
15 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 83% | 50% | 17% | 17% | ![]() |
16 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 0% | - |
18 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
19 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
20 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
21 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
22 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
23 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
24 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
25 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | ![]() |
26 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | ![]() |
27 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
28 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | ![]() |
29 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 0% | - |
30 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
31 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 67% | 17% | 0% | - |
32 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 0% | ![]() |
33 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
34 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | ![]() |
35 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 17% | ![]() |
36 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
37 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | ![]() |
38 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 17% | - |
39 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | ![]() |
40 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
41 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
42 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% | ![]() |
43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | ![]() |
44 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 83% | ![]() |
45 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
46 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
48 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% | - |
49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | ![]() |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% | - |
Chongqing Tongliang Long FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Chengdu Better City FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Tai'an Tiankuang FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Qingdao Jonoon FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 64 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Chongqing Tongliang Long FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 20% |
2 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 60% |
4 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 19 |
| 2.38 | 63% | 13% | 38% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
6 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 60% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
11 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 30% | 30% | 30% |
12 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
14 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
15 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
17 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
18 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
21 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
23 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
24 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 90% |
25 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 50% | 20% | 20% |
26 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 30% |
27 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
28 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
29 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
30 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
32 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 14% | 14% |
33 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 50% | 30% | 30% |
36 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 30% |
38 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 50% | 40% | 40% |
39 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
41 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 50% |
42 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 30% |
43 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.75 | 38% | 50% | 38% | 38% |
44 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 20% |
45 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
46 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 22 | -12 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
47 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 50% | 40% | 30% |
48 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
49 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Hebei Kungfu FC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Shenyang Urban FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Chongqing Tongliang Long FC, whose tally of 24 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.4 points per game. Can Chongqing Tongliang Long FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Shandong Luneng Taishan FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Shandong Luneng Taishan FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 1 draws and 3 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
2 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
3 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 0% |
4 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
10 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
16 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 20% |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
19 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
20 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
22 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
24 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
25 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
26 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
27 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 60% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
31 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
32 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 0% |
34 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
35 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
36 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
38 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
39 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
40 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
41 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
42 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
43 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
44 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 0% |
45 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
46 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
48 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 20% |
49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Shenyang Urban FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Chongqing Tongliang Long FC is on the same track as Shenyang Urban FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Hebei Kungfu FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Guangxi Hengchen FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
2 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
3 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
4 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
7 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
9 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
10 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
12 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
14 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
15 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
16 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
21 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
23 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
25 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
28 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
31 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
35 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
37 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
38 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
39 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
40 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
41 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
42 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
43 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
44 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
45 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
46 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
47 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
48 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
49 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
50 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Shanghai Shenhua FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Hongkou Stadium) with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Beijing Guoan FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Workers' Stadium). With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Shanghai Shenhua FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 75% |
2 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% |
4 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
6 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 25% |
7 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
9 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
13 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
14 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
15 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
16 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
17 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
19 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
21 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
28 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
29 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
30 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
32 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 67% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
35 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
36 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
37 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
38 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
40 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
41 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
47 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
48 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Chengdu Better City FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Chengdu Better City FC have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3