Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 33% | - |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
3 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% | - |
4 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | - |
6 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
7 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
8 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | - |
9 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | - |
10 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 17% | - |
11 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
13 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
14 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
15 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
16 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
17 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
18 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
19 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
20 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
21 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
22 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
23 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
24 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
25 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
26 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
27 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
28 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
29 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
30 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
31 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
32 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
33 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
34 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
35 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
36 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 33% | - |
37 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
38 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 50% | - |
39 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
40 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% | - |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% | - |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() |
Guangxi Hengchen FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Shanghai Shenhua FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Shenzhen 2028 FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Winner Match 60
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 61
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 62
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 70 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Guangxi Hengchen FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Winner Match 62
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 12 | 16 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 30% |
4 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 30% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 30% |
9 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 70% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
12 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
15 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
16 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 40% |
17 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 70% |
18 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 30% |
19 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
22 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 15 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 60% |
23 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
28 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 70% |
30 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
31 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
32 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
35 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
36 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
37 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
40 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 40% | 60% | 30% | 40% |
41 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 70% | 30% | 30% |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 25 | -20 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 70% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Shanghai Shenhua FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Guangxi Hengchen FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.5 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Shenzhen 2028 FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Shenzhen 2028 FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Yanbian Longding FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Yanbian Longding FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
3 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
5 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
6 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
7 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
10 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% |
12 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
18 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
19 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
21 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
22 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
23 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
24 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
25 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
26 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
27 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
28 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
29 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
31 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
32 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
34 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
35 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
38 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Guangxi Hengchen FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Shenzhen 2028 FC is on the same track as Guangxi Hengchen FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Shanghai Shenhua FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Dalian Huayi FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
2 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% |
4 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
9 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
10 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
11 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
12 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
21 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
23 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
24 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
27 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
28 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
29 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
31 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
32 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
35 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
36 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
37 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
38 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
40 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
41 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
42 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
49 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Yanbian Longding FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 1 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.4.
• Dalian Zhixing FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Yanbian Longding FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 25% |
2 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
3 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
10 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% |
11 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
12 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
13 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
14 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 0% |
16 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
19 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
21 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
22 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
23 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
24 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
30 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
31 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
32 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
35 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
36 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
37 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
40 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
44 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Shenzhen 2028 FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Shenzhen 2028 FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1