- FootyStats
- ›
- China
- ›
- Chinese FA Cup
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 83% | 17% | 17% | 33% | |
| 2 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 3 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% | |
| 5 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 9 | ![]() | Ganzhou Ruishi FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 50% | |
| 10 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 67% | |
| 12 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 17% | |
| 15 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 16 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% | |
| 17 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 75% | 0% | 50% | |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 20 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | ![]() | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | ![]() | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | ![]() | Shandong Scout | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Ningxia Pingluo Hengli FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 28 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 29 | ![]() | Shanxi Xiangyu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Guangdong Shudihong FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Changle Jingangtui FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Changchun Xidu FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Wuchuan Youth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Xiamen 1026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||
| 36 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Nantong Home Textile | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Wuhua Huajing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Beijing Smart Sky | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Guizhou Feiying | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Xingjun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Huzhou Changxing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongxing Greenery | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Tianjin Kaiser | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Hainan Shuangyu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenzhen Keysida | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | - |
Rizhao Yuqi FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Tai'an Tiankuang FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Beijing Institute of Technology FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Tianjin Kaiser
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Hainan Shuangyu
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Shenzhen Keysida
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 48 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Rizhao Yuqi FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Shenzhen Keysida
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 2 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | ![]() | Shandong Scout | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 80% | 40% | 10% | 30% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 30% |
| 11 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 30% |
| 15 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
| 17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Ningxia Pingluo Hengli FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 50% | 20% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 50% | 50% | 10% | 10% |
| 24 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Ganzhou Ruishi FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 30% |
| 27 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 75% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shanxi Xiangyu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Guangdong Shudihong FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Wuchuan Youth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Changle Jingangtui FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Changchun Xidu FC | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 30% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Xiamen 1026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 | ![]() | Nantong Home Textile | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Wuhua Huajing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Beijing Smart Sky | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Guizhou Feiying | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Xingjun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Huzhou Changxing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongxing Greenery | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Tianjin Kaiser | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Hainan Shuangyu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenzhen Keysida | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Beijing Institute of Technology FC have been doing really well with 2.1 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Rizhao Yuqi FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.1 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Tai'an Tiankuang FC, whose tally of 21 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.1 points per game. Can Tai'an Tiankuang FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses.
• Shenzhen Keysida is simply doing terribly in the last 10 games. Compared to other teams, they have the lowest points tally with an average of 0 points per game. This is the worst in the Chinese FA Cup. Can they turn it around before it's too late?
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 4 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 7 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 10 | ![]() | Ganzhou Ruishi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 12 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 14 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 17 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 75% | 0% | 50% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shandong Scout | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Ningxia Pingluo Hengli FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shanxi Xiangyu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Guangdong Shudihong FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Changle Jingangtui FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 32 | ![]() | Changchun Xidu FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Wuchuan Youth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Xiamen 1026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 | ![]() | Nantong Home Textile | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 | ![]() | Wuhua Huajing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Beijing Smart Sky | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Guizhou Feiying | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Xingjun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Huzhou Changxing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongxing Greenery | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Tianjin Kaiser | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Hainan Shuangyu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenzhen Keysida | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Rizhao Yuqi FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Tai'an Tiankuang FC is on the same track as Rizhao Yuqi FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Shanghai Segenda FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Langfang Glory City FC, whose 2 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses take them to an underwhelming 1.4 points per game so far this season.
• Not doing good : Hainan Shuangyu has been performing subpar compared to other teams with 0 wins in last 5 games. This takes them to an average of 0 points per game making it one of the worst performing teams of the season. At this rate they may be risking relegation or being thrown out of the Chinese FA Cup.
• Dangerously poor : Shenzhen Keysida's performance has statistically been the weakest in the Chinese FA Cup. They've been abysmal recently with just 0 wins in last 5 games. The average points per game comes out to be 0 making them the worst performer. They've only scored 0 goals and conceded 6! If they keep this up we're not sure if the fans can bare watching Shenzhen Keysida play.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 3 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 7 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 16 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shandong Scout | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Ganzhou Ruishi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Guangdong Shudihong FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shanxi Xiangyu FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Wuchuan Youth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Changchun Xidu FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Beijing Smart Sky | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | ![]() | Dongxing Greenery | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | ![]() | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | ![]() | Guizhou Feiying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Hainan Shuangyu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Nantong Home Textile | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Ningxia Pingluo Hengli FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Qingdao Fuli | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Shenzhen Keysida | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Shenzhen Xingjun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Tianjin Kaiser | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Xiamen 1026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Wuhua Huajing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Huzhou Changxing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Changle Jingangtui FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Langfang Glory City FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Shanghai Segenda FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 2 wins, 1 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 1.75 which is nearly as good as Langfang Glory City FC.
• Huzhou Changxing's performance has been sub-standard in their home stadium. Huzhou Changxing managed to get just 0 wins in the last 6 games played at their home venue. Their average points per game is 0 making them the 2nd worst performing side in Chinese FA Cup at home.
• Woeful, just woeful. Changle Jingangtui FC's performances have been terrible at home. With 0 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses, and just the 0 points per game in their last 6 home games to show for, Changle Jingangtui FC is simply not turning up at home games.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Ganzhou Ruishi FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 50% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 6 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 7 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 9 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | ![]() | Ningxia Pingluo Hengli FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | ![]() | Changle Jingangtui FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% |
| 15 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Changchun Xidu FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Beijing Smart Sky | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Guizhou Feiying | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Dongxing Greenery | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Guangzhou Rockgoal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Shenzhen Xingjun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | ![]() | Hainan Shuangyu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Nantong Home Textile | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shenzhen Keysida | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Tianjin Kaiser | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Chongqing Handa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Shanxi Xiangyu FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 36 | ![]() | Huzhou Changxing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | ![]() | Shandong Scout | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Shanxi TYUT Changsheng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Wuchuan Youth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Wuhua Huajing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Guangdong Shudihong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Xiamen 1026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Tai'an Tiankuang FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Tai'an Tiankuang FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
• Xiamen 1026 is on a disappointing run at away games. They remain the worst performer with 0 wins in the last 6 games played away from their home stadium, which is quite unfavourable for the club and their fans.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1
















































