Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 17% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 67% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 100% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
Shenyang Urban FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Guangdong GZ-Power FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Rizhao Yuqi FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Wuhan Three Towns FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Qingdao Red Lions FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 64 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Shenyang Urban FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Qingdao Red Lions FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 14 | 16 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 6 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| 7 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 70% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 11 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 60% | 50% | 10% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 30% |
| 24 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 50% | 20% | 20% |
| 25 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 28 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 100% |
| 29 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
| 30 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 31 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 34 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 37 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 27 | -17 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 26 | -18 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 48 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 24 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 50% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangdong GZ-Power FC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Wuxi Wugou FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Shandong Luneng Taishan FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Shandong Luneng Taishan FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Rizhao Yuqi FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Rizhao Yuqi FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 11 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 17 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 19 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 20 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 25 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 30 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 31 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 34 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 37 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 41 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 43 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
| 44 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 45 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Yanbian Longding FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Shenyang Urban FC is on the same track as Yanbian Longding FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Guangdong GZ-Power FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Yunnan Yukun FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 9 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 12 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 15 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 19 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 26 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 35 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 40 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 43 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 48 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 50 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Guangdong GZ-Power FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Beijing Guoan FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Workers' Stadium). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 1 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.25 which is nearly as good as Guangdong GZ-Power FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 5 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 7 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 9 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 15 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 31 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 33 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 34 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 45 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Chongqing Tongliang Long FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Chongqing Tongliang Long FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1


















































