Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% | - |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% | - |
3 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 17% | - |
4 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 33% | - |
6 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 83% | - |
7 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
8 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
9 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
10 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 17% | - |
11 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
12 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | - |
13 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
14 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 0% | - |
15 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
16 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 17% | - |
18 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
19 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
20 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 33% | - |
21 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
22 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
23 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
24 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
25 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
26 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
27 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
28 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
29 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
30 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
31 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
32 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
33 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 50% | - |
34 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
35 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
36 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
37 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
38 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
39 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
40 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 100% | - |
41 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 50% | - |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% | - |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ![]() |
Guangxi Hengchen FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Shenzhen 2028 FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Winner Match 60
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 61
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Winner Match 62
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 70 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Guangxi Hengchen FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Winner Match 62
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 16 | 12 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 15 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
6 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 40% | 30% |
7 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
9 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
10 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 70% |
11 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 30% |
15 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
16 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 20% |
18 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
19 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
22 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
23 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
27 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
28 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
29 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
30 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 21 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 90% |
32 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 30% |
33 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
34 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
35 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
36 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 50% | 30% | 40% |
37 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 40% | 50% | 40% | 40% |
39 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 22 | -7 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 90% |
40 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
41 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 50% |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 2 |
| 0.20 | 10% | 70% | 30% | 20% |
44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 26 | -20 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 70% |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangxi Hengchen FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Shenzhen 2028 FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Shanghai Shenhua FC, whose tally of 23 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.3 points per game. Can Shanghai Shenhua FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Dalian Zhixing FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Dalian Zhixing FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
2 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
3 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
4 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
5 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 20% |
6 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
8 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
10 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
11 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
12 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
15 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
16 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
17 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0% |
18 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 40% |
19 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
20 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
21 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
23 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
24 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
27 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
29 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
30 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
31 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
32 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
33 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
34 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
35 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
36 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
37 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
38 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 40% |
40 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 100% |
41 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
42 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
43 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
49 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Shenzhen 2028 FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Guangxi Hengchen FC is on the same track as Shenzhen 2028 FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Dalian Huayi FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Dalian Zhixing FC, whose 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.4 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% |
4 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
7 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
10 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
11 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
12 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
13 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
14 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
17 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
19 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
20 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
21 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 100% |
22 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
23 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
24 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
28 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
29 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
31 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
33 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
34 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
35 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
36 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
37 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
38 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
40 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
42 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
44 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
49 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
50 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Yunnan Yukun FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Dalian Zhixing FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Yunnan Yukun FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
5 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
8 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
10 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 25% |
11 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
13 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
14 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
15 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
16 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
17 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
18 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
19 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
20 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
21 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
22 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
23 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
24 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
25 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
26 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
27 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
29 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
31 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
32 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
33 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
34 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
35 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
36 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
37 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
38 | ![]() | Winner Match 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
39 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 33% |
40 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | Winner Match 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
42 | ![]() | Winner Match 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Winner Match 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
46 | ![]() | Winner Match 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
47 | ![]() | Winner Match 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
48 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
49 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
50 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Shanghai SIPG FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Shanghai SIPG FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1