Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 33% | - |
| 4 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 6 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 83% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 100% | |
| 31 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 67% | 0% | 0% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 67% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
Shenyang Urban FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Guangdong GZ-Power FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Rizhao Yuqi FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Wuhan Three Towns FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Qingdao Red Lions FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.17 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 64 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Shenyang Urban FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Qingdao Red Lions FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 20% | 40% | 70% |
| 6 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 27 | 14 | 13 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 90% |
| 7 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 70% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 19 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 20 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| 22 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 60% | 50% | 10% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 30% |
| 27 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 50% | 20% | 20% |
| 28 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 29 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 30 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 31 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
| 35 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 70% |
| 36 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 37 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 90% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 50% | 70% |
| 48 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 24 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.10 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 50% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangdong GZ-Power FC have been doing really well with 2.6 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Wuxi Wugou FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Yanbian Longding FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Yanbian Longding FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Rizhao Yuqi FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Rizhao Yuqi FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 6 wins, 3 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 4 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 40% |
| 5 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 6 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 10 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 17 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 19 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 21 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 27 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
| 31 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| 34 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 36 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 38 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 40 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 43 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 44 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 46 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 48 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Yanbian Longding FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Shenyang Urban FC is on the same track as Yanbian Longding FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Guangdong GZ-Power FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chongqing Tongliang Long FC, whose 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses take them to an underwhelming 2.2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 10 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 14 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 17 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 19 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 20 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 22 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 24 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 26 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 27 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 29 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 30 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 34 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
| 37 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 40 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 42 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 44 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| 48 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Tianjin Teda FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium) with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Guangdong GZ-Power FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Tianjin Teda FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 2 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 4 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 7 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 8 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| 12 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 13 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 19 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 20 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 21 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 22 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 24 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 67% |
| 25 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 27 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 28 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 30 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 32 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 35 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.25 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
| 46 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Chongqing Tongliang Long FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Chongqing Tongliang Long FC have the highest points tally with 9 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1


















































