- FootyStats
- ›
- China
- ›
- Chinese FA Cup
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 7 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 8 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 11 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | |
| 13 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 67% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 0% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
Hebei Kungfu FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Guangdong GZ-Power FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Shanghai SIPG FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Shenyang Urban FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Qingdao Jonoon FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Nanjing City FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 80 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Hebei Kungfu FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Nanjing City FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 10% | 60% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 60% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 4 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 8 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
| 10 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 12 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| 13 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 10% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 17 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 90% |
| 18 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 30% |
| 20 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 22 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 23 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 24 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 26 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 27 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 50% |
| 33 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 35 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
| 37 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 38 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 21 | -11 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 44 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 21 | -7 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 40% |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 20% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 30% |
| 49 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 50% |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 29 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangdong GZ-Power FC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Hebei Kungfu FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Shanghai SIPG FC, whose tally of 23 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 1 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.3 points per game. Can Shanghai SIPG FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Nantong Zhiyun FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Nantong Zhiyun FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 4 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 5 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
| 6 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
| 8 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 9 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 11 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 13 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 14 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 15 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0% |
| 16 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 80% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 19 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 20 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 21 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 22 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 23 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 24 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 27 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 29 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 30 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 31 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 60% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 34 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 35 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 37 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 39 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 40 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 41 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 42 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 44 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 80% | 0% | 0% |
| 45 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 46 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 47 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Shanghai SIPG FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Hebei Kungfu FC is on the same track as Shanghai SIPG FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Guangdong GZ-Power FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 3 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.2 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Yunnan Yukun FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 8 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 9 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% |
| 12 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 14 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 16 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 17 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 18 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 20 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 23 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 26 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 31 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 40 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 41 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 44 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 47 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 48 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 50 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Yunnan Yukun FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Shaanxi Union FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Yunnan Yukun FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 4 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 11 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 12 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 15 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 18 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 28 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.50 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 25% |
| 29 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 31 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 34 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 39 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 45 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 50 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Guangdong GZ-Power FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Guangdong GZ-Power FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1


















































