Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% | - |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% | - |
3 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 100% | - |
4 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 17% | - |
5 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
6 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
7 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 67% | - |
8 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
9 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | ![]() |
10 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | - |
11 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
12 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
13 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
14 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 67% | - |
15 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 17% | - |
16 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 83% | - |
17 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% | - |
18 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
19 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
20 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
21 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 50% | - |
22 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
23 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
24 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
25 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
26 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | - |
27 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 83% | ![]() |
28 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 33% | - |
29 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 0% | - |
30 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 17% | - |
31 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
32 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
33 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
34 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
35 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
36 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
37 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 67% | 17% | 17% | - |
38 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
39 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
40 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
41 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
43 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
44 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 33% | 83% | 17% | 0% | - |
45 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 33% | - |
46 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
47 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | - |
48 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 83% | - |
49 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% | - |
Guangxi Hengchen FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 3 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.Shenzhen 2028 FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 3 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Shandong Luneng Taishan FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.Wuhan Three Towns FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.5 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Chongqing Chunlei FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.33 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0.33 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 64 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Guangxi Hengchen FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 25 |
| 2.50 | 70% | 0% | 30% | 50% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
3 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
4 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 50% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 21 |
| 2.10 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 10% | 90% | 90% |
7 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
8 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 30% |
9 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
10 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 30% |
11 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
15 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 10% |
16 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
17 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 60% | 20% | 30% | 20% |
18 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 40% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
19 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 20% |
20 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
21 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 30% |
22 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 70% |
23 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 70% |
24 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
25 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
27 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% |
29 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
30 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 40% | 50% | 40% |
31 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 30% |
32 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
33 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
34 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 29 | -11 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 10% | 80% | 80% |
35 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
36 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
37 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
38 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 30% | 30% |
39 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 30% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
40 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
41 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 40% |
42 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 10% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
43 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 9 |
| 0.90 | 20% | 70% | 30% | 30% |
44 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 7 |
| 0.70 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 80% |
45 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 70% |
46 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 23 | -13 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
47 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 5 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 70% |
48 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 30% | 30% |
49 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangxi Hengchen FC have been doing really well with 2.5 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Shenzhen 2028 FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.4 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 7 wins and 2 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Shandong Luneng Taishan FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Shandong Luneng Taishan FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
2 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 15 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
3 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 20% |
4 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
5 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
6 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 100% |
7 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
8 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
9 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
10 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
11 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
12 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
14 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
15 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 80% |
16 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
17 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
18 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
19 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
20 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
21 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
22 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
23 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
24 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
25 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
26 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
27 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
28 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 20% |
29 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 0% |
30 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
31 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
32 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
33 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
34 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
35 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
36 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
37 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
38 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
39 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
40 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
41 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 40% |
42 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
43 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
44 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
45 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 100% |
46 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 80% |
47 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 80% | 20% | 0% |
48 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
49 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
50 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Shenzhen 2028 FC is doing exceptionally well with 3 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Guangxi Hengchen FC is on the same track as Shenzhen 2028 FC with an average of of 3 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Nantong Zhiyun FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 0 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Chengdu Better City FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 25% |
2 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
3 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
5 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 40% |
7 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
9 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
10 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
11 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
12 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
13 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
14 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 50% |
15 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
17 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
18 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
19 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
20 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
21 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
22 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
25 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
26 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
27 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
29 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
31 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
32 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
33 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
34 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
35 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
36 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
37 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
38 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
39 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
40 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
41 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 75% |
42 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
43 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
44 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
45 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
46 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
47 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
48 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
50 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Tianjin Teda FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium (Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium) with 0 losses and 3 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 2.5.
• Shandong Luneng Taishan FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium (Jinan Olympic Sports Center Stadium). With 3 wins, 0 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 3 which is nearly as good as Tianjin Teda FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
2 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 67% |
4 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 33% |
5 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
6 | ![]() | Tai'an Tiankuang FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
7 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
8 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
9 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
10 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
11 | ![]() | Guangdong Mingtu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
12 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
13 | ![]() | Guizhou Zhucheng Athletic FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
14 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
15 | ![]() | Yichun Grand Tiger FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
16 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
17 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
18 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
19 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
20 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
21 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
22 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 50% |
23 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 0% |
24 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
25 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
26 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
27 | ![]() | Nantong Haimen Codion FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
28 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% |
29 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
30 | ![]() | Guangxi Baoyun FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
31 | ![]() | Beijing Institute of Technology FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
32 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% |
33 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 67% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
34 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% |
35 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
36 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
37 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
38 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% |
39 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
40 | ![]() | Shenzhen Jixiang FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
41 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 50% |
42 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
43 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
44 | ![]() | Shaanxi Northwest Youth FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
45 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
46 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
47 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
48 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% |
49 | ![]() | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
50 | ![]() | Chongqing Chunlei FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Guangdong GZ-Power FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 3 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Guangdong GZ-Power FC have the highest points tally with 10 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1