- FootyStats
- ›
- China
- ›
- Chinese FA Cup
- ›
- Form Table - Last 5 & 10
Form Table - Last 5 & 10 - China Chinese FA Cup
- Stats in this category :
- Home & Away Tables -
- Form Table -
- Home Advantage -
- Draws -
- Predictions -
- Attendance -
- Players
Form Table - Chinese FA Cup
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | Next Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | |
| 4 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 5 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 13 |
| 2.17 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 67% | |
| 6 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 7 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 67% | |
| 8 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 9 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 10 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | |
| 11 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 12 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.83 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 13 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 14 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 15 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 17% | 33% | 50% | - |
| 16 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 17 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 18 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 19 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 |
| 1.67 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 20 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | - |
| 21 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 17% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 22 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 9 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 83% | - |
| 23 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | - |
| 24 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 25 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 50% | - |
| 26 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 27 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 8 |
| 1.33 | 17% | 33% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 28 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 17% | 0% | 83% | 83% | - |
| 29 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 30 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 31 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.17 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 32 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% | - |
| 33 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | - |
| 34 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 35 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 17% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 36 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 5 |
| 0.83 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 37 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 38 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 39 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% | - |
| 40 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 17% | - |
| 41 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 42 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 67% | - |
| 43 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% | - |
| 44 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.50 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 45 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 50% | - |
| 46 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 50% | 50% | 33% | - |
| 47 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 2 |
| 0.33 | 17% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 67% | - |
| 49 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 0.17 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | - |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | - |
Hebei Kungfu FC
is currently the most in form team in the Chinese FA Cup. They picked up an average of 2.67 Points Per Game. This makes them the best performing team.
Guangdong GZ-Power FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Shanghai SIPG FC
is doing very good but not excellent. Their performance earned them 2.33 Points Per Game. This makes them one of the better performing teams.
Shenyang Urban FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Nanjing City FC
ended their recent results very poorly. This performance equated to 0.17 Points Per Game. This is one of the worst performances in this league.
Qingdao Jonoon FC
is the worst performing team in the league. They've earned 0 Points Per Game in their last 6 matches. This is the poorest form in the league and could possibly lead to relegation.
- Chinese FA Cup (China) Form Table consists of 80 teams, generating its form stats from the last 6 matches that they have played.
- The best performing team in the Chinese FA Cup is Hebei Kungfu FC
- The team with the worst form currently in the Chinese FA Cup is Qingdao Jonoon FC
Last 10 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 10 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 24 |
| 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 23 |
| 2.30 | 40% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 4 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 5 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 22 |
| 2.20 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 20% |
| 8 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 9 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 60% |
| 10 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 20 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 14 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 40% | 30% | 50% | 30% |
| 15 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 18 |
| 1.80 | 30% | 10% | 60% | 80% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 17 |
| 1.70 | 20% | 10% | 70% | 90% |
| 17 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 30% | 0% | 70% | 30% |
| 18 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 20% | 20% | 70% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 30% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 50% | 10% | 50% | 40% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 22 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 15 |
| 1.50 | 10% | 30% | 60% | 70% |
| 23 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 24 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 25 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% |
| 26 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 70% |
| 27 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 10% | 0% | 90% | 80% |
| 28 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 14 |
| 1.40 | 30% | 10% | 70% | 50% |
| 29 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 30% | 30% | 60% | 60% |
| 32 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 13 |
| 1.30 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 33 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 10% | 20% | 80% | 50% |
| 34 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 30% | 20% | 50% | 50% |
| 35 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 30% | 50% | 40% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.20 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
| 37 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 30% | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 38 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 11 |
| 1.10 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 39 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 50% |
| 40 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 10 |
| 1.00 | 10% | 20% | 70% | 60% |
| 41 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 42 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 30% | 40% | 40% | 30% |
| 44 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 8 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 45 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 10 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 40% |
| 46 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 20% |
| 48 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 10% | 30% | 70% | 60% |
| 49 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 18 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.30 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 29 | -21 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 30% | 70% | 70% |
Last 10 Form Guide For Chinese FA Cup
• During the last 10 games, Guangdong GZ-Power FC have been doing really well with 2.4 points per game earned. In fact, they are the best in terms of performances in the Chinese FA Cup just based on the last 10 matches.
• Shanghai SIPG FC is also on fire lately. Their last 10 matches ended with an average of of 2.3 points per game which puts them 2nd in the last 10 form table.
• Chasing the top runners are Beijing Guoan FC, whose tally of 22 points see them at the 3rd place in the last 10 form table. 6 wins and 0 losses in the last 10 matches mean they are sitting with an average of 2.2 points per game. Can Beijing Guoan FC improve and top the table soon?
• Being average in the last 10 Chinese FA Cup games, Shenzhen Juniors FC fans are probably wondering whether their team is going to move up or down in the last 10 table next. Shenzhen Juniors FC is currently sitting in the middle of the pack with 5 wins, 4 draws and 1 losses.
Last 5 Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 2 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 13 |
| 2.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| 2.40 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 4 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 60% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 6 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 7 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 |
| 2.20 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 20% |
| 8 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 80% |
| 9 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 80% |
| 10 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
| 2.00 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 11 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 12 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 13 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 14 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 15 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 16 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 0% |
| 17 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 18 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 19 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 20 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| 21 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 22 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 23 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| 24 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 25 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| 26 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 27 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 28 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| 29 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 30 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 31 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 33 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 34 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 35 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 38 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 39 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 20% | 80% | 40% |
| 40 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 41 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| 42 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 43 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 0.60 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 44 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 20% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 2 |
| 0.40 | 20% | 40% | 60% | 60% |
| 46 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 47 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 48 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 1 |
| 0.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 80% |
| 49 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 80% |
| 50 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 60% |
Which Teams are Doing Well Based On Last 5 Form? - Form Guide
• Excellent : Shanghai SIPG FC is doing exceptionally well with 2.6 points per game earned in the last 5 matches.
• Very good : Hebei Kungfu FC is on the same track as Shanghai SIPG FC with an average of of 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches.
• Quite good : Guangxi Hengchen FC is the 3rd most well performing team with 4 wins and 1 losses in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.4 points per game.
• Average performance : There are a few teams that's been bang average recently. This includes Yunnan Yukun FC, whose 3 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses take them to an underwhelming 2 points per game so far this season.
Home - Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 50% |
| 2 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 100% |
| 3 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% |
| 4 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| 2.00 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 6 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 8 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 10 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 11 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 12 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
| 13 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.75 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 50% |
| 14 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 1.40 | 40% | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 15 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% |
| 16 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 17 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| 18 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 23 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 25 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 30 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 31 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 33 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 35 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
| 0.75 | 25% | 25% | 75% | 50% |
| 39 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 40 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% |
| 41 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 42 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 43 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 44 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 45 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 46 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 47 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 48 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 49 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms?
• Yunnan Yukun FC has been the finest performer at their home stadium with 0 losses and 4 wins in the last 6 matches at home. Their average points per game stands highest among all other clubs with 3.
• Shaanxi Union FC has been showing excellent performances in their home stadium. With 3 wins, 1 draw, and 0 losses. Their form brings them to 2nd place in the Chinese FA Cup home form table. Average points per game comes out as 2.5 which is nearly as good as Yunnan Yukun FC.
Away Form Table (Chinese FA Cup)
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 6 | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | Over 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() | Hebei Kungfu FC | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 3.00 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 2 | ![]() | Guangdong GZ-Power FC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 10 |
| 2.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 75% |
| 3 | ![]() | Guangxi Hengchen FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | ![]() | Jiangxi Liansheng | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | ![]() | Shanghai SIPG FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| 3.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 6 | ![]() | Suzhou Dongwu FC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 | ![]() | Shanghai Shenhua FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 8 | ![]() | Xi'an Ronghai FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 1.50 | 25% | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 9 | ![]() | Beijing Guoan FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 10 | ![]() | Langfang Glory City FC | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% |
| 11 | ![]() | Guangzhou Dandelion Alpha FC | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1.25 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 25% |
| 12 | ![]() | Rizhao Yuqi FC | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.00 | 25% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 13 | ![]() | Sichuan Jiuniu FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 14 | ![]() | Chengdu Better City FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 | ![]() | Hubei Chufeng Heli FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | ![]() | Yanbian Longding FC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 4 |
| 0.80 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 60% |
| 17 | ![]() | Dalian Kewei | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| 18 | ![]() | Dalian Zhixing FC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 1.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 19 | ![]() | Shenzhen Juniors FC | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 20 | ![]() | Wuhan Three Towns FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 21 | ![]() | Shandong Luneng Taishan FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | ![]() | Nantong Zhiyun FC | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 23 | ![]() | Qingdao Youth Island FC | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 24 | ![]() | Wuxi Wugou FC | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 | ![]() | Chongqing Tongliang Long FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 26 | ![]() | Dalian Huayi FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 27 | ![]() | Shenzhen 2028 FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 28 | ![]() | Henan Jianye FC | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 2 |
| 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 29 | ![]() | Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 | ![]() | Shanghai Segenda FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 31 | ![]() | Dongguan United FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 32 | ![]() | Changchun Yatai FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | ![]() | Meizhou Hakka FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 34 | ![]() | Qingdao Red Lions FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% |
| 35 | ![]() | Zhejiang Professional FC | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 1 |
| 0.33 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 36 | ![]() | Tianjin Teda FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 37 | ![]() | Yunnan Yukun FC | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 1 |
| 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
| 38 | ![]() | Beijing Pengrui | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 39 | ![]() | Shanghai Jiading City Development | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 | ![]() | Nanjing City FC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% |
| 41 | ![]() | Shenyang Urban FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 50% |
| 42 | ![]() | Liaocheng Legend | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | ![]() | Xiamen Chengyi FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | ![]() | Shaanxi Union FC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 45 | ![]() | Guizhou Xufengtang | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | ![]() | Shanghai Imair | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | ![]() | Wuhan Lianzhen FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | ![]() | Yulin Miners | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | ![]() | Yunnan Cuanhe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | ![]() | Qingdao Jonoon FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 75% |
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms?
• Hebei Kungfu FC is on an incredible run playing at away matches. They managed to bag 4 wins in their last 6 matches played away from home. Hebei Kungfu FC have the highest points tally with 12 which makes them the best performer at the away venues in the Chinese FA Cup.
Form Table - China
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Cup or Playoff
- Division 3
- Division 1


















































