主场& 客场积分表 - 美国足球冠军乙级联赛
主场积分表
| 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去5场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 两队都得分 | 第一队入球 | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | 平均 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | 雷丁狂怒 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 30 |
| 2.73 | 36% | 64% | 0% | 82% | 73% | 3.82 | ||
| 2 |  | Calgary Foothills Soccer Club | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 3 | +15 | 26 |
| 2.60 | 70% | 30% | 10% | 60% | 20% | 2.10 | ||
| 3 |  | FC Golden State Force | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 7 | +18 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 88% | 75% | 4.00 | ||
| 4 |  | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 21 |
| 2.63 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 63% | 50% | 2.75 | ||
| 5 |  | 得梅因威胁 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 4 | +12 | 20 |
| 2.22 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 56% | 33% | 2.22 | ||
| 6 |  | 密西西比布里拉 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 4 | +15 | 19 |
| 2.71 | 43% | 57% | 14% | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 7 |  | Albion Hurricanes FC Royals | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 |
| 2.57 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 8 |  | The Villages FC | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 3 | +17 | 17 |
| 2.43 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 86% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 9 |  | Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 17 |
| 2.43 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 10 |  | Myrtle Beach Mutiny | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 8 | +14 | 16 |
| 2.67 | 33% | 67% | 17% | 83% | 83% | 5.00 | ||
| 11 |  | New York Red Bulls III | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 16 |
| 2.29 | 43% | 57% | 14% | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 12 |  | SIMA Aguilas | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 16 |
| 1.78 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 78% | 56% | 2.44 | ||
| 13 |  | 大洋城男爵 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 15 |
| 2.14 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 14 |  | Kaw Valley FC | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 15 |
| 2.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 3.71 | ||
| 15 |  | South Carolina United Bantams | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 8 | +13 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 43% | 57% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | ||
| 16 |  | Brazos Valley FC | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 13 | +13 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 5.57 | ||
| 17 |  | FC Tucson | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 43% | 57% | 0% | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 18 |  | Lakeland Tropics SC | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 43% | 57% | 0% | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 19 |  | Santa Cruz Breakers FC | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 20 |  | 布拉登顿学院 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 21 |  | Chicago FC United | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 57% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 22 |  | 长岛骑马者 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 43% | 57% | 0% | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 23 |  | Birmingham Hammers FC | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 100% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 24 |  | Corpus Christi FC | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 100% | 71% | 4.57 | ||
| 25 |  | 西部先锋 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 100% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 26 |  | Tri Cities FC | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 27 |  | 卡里铁路之鹰U23 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 28 |  | Oklahoma City Energy FC II | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.43 | ||
| 29 |  | Lionsbridge FC | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 11 |
| 1.57 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 71% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 30 |  | 文图拉县溶合 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 31 |  | Lansing United | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 100% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 32 |  | GPS Portland Phoenix | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 86% | 3.86 | ||
| 33 |  | 弗雷斯诺福尔戈 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 43% | 57% | 0% | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 34 |  | Lane United FC | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 35 |  | Peachtree City MOBA FC | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 4.29 | ||
| 36 |  | Weston FC | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 71% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 37 |  | FC Cleburne | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | ||
| 38 |  | 密歇根公鹿 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 2.29 | ||
| 39 |  | 夏洛特雄鹰 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 40 |  | Texas United FC | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 4.71 | ||
| 41 |  | 塔科马潮水 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 42 |  | Orange County SC II | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | ||
| 43 |  | San Francisco City FC | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 86% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 44 |  | 雷湾寒颤 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 86% | 71% | 2.86 | ||
| 45 |  | 韦斯特切斯特火焰 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.13 | 25% | 50% | 38% | 88% | 38% | 2.50 | ||
| 46 |  | TSS FC Rovers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 86% | 86% | 3.29 | ||
| 47 |  | 维克托里亚高原人 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 57% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 48 |  | Black Rock FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | ||
| 49 |  | San Francisco Glens SC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 50 |  | 新汉普顿郡幻影 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 57% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 51 |  | 圣路易斯雄狮 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 52 |  | Colorado Pride Switchbacks FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | ||
| 53 |  | Tobacco Road FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | ||
| 54 |  | 卡罗莱纳戴拿模 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | ||
| 55 |  | Dayton Dutch Lions | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 100% | 75% | 4.13 | ||
| 56 |  | Albuquerque Sol FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 5.57 | ||
| 57 |  | 西弗吉尼亚混乱 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 100% | 57% | 3.86 | ||
| 58 |  | Portland Timbers III | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 59 |  | 南加州海马 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 100% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 60 |  | FC Miami City Champions | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 3.86 | ||
| 61 |  | AC Connecticut Soccer | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 3.57 | ||
| 62 |  | San Diego Zest FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 63 |  | Next Academy Palm Beach FC | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 83% | 3.67 | ||
| 64 |  | FC Boston Bolts | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 3.71 | ||
| 65 |  | FA Euro New York Magic | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 86% | 43% | 3.00 | ||
| 66 |  | Houston FC | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 67 |  | Memphis FC | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 5 |
| 0.71 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | ||
| 68 |  | Cincinnati Dutch Lions FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 1.83 | ||
| 69 |  | Evergreen FC | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 71% | 43% | 3.29 | ||
| 70 |  | Ogden City SC | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 71 |  | North County United FC | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 14 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 71% | 71% | 2.57 | ||
| 72 |  | FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 19 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 73 |  | World Soccer Academy Winnipeg | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 22 | -16 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 100% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 74 |  | Derby City Rovers | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 46 | -41 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 100% | 7.29 |
- 雷丁狂怒
在主场表现非常出色。他们的主场比赛获胜百分比是 91% - South Georgia Tormenta FC
是在主场表现出色排名前3的球队，主场比赛获胜比率为 88%。 - FC Golden State Force
是在主场表现出色排名前3的球队，主场比赛获胜比率为 88%。 - World Soccer Academy Winnipeg
是主场赛程中表现最差的球队之一，排名前3。World Soccer Academy Winnipeg的主场比赛获胜比率为0%。 - Derby City Rovers
是主场赛程中表现最差的球队之一，排名前3。Derby City Rovers的主场比赛获胜比率为0%。 - FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic
拥有0%的所有团队中主场比赛获胜百分比最低。
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛(美国)主场积分表由74球队组成，每支球队平均在主场打了11场比赛。
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛中的主场获胜百分比为44%
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛 中的主队平均每场比赛得分为1.81，而他们每场比赛失球为1.65，在主场比赛中。
- 主场队伍平均11.93次射门，但每场比赛越位被罚球0 次。
- 所有这些总结意味着美国足球冠军乙级联赛中的主队有10%的可能，在主场平均表现更佳。
客场积分表
| 球队 | 场次 | 赢 | 平 | 输 | 进球 | 失球 | 净胜球 | 积分 | 过去5场 | 场均得分 | 没有失球 | 两队都得分 | 第一队入球 | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | 平均 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Black Rock FC | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 8 | +10 | 22 |
| 2.75 | 25% | 75% | 0% | 100% | 75% | 3.25 | ||
| 2 | | 得梅因威胁 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | +18 | 21 |
| 3.00 | 57% | 43% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 3.43 | ||
| 3 | | Calgary Foothills Soccer Club | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6 | +14 | 21 |
| 2.63 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 75% | 63% | 3.25 | ||
| 4 | | Dayton Dutch Lions | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 2 | +15 | 19 |
| 2.71 | 71% | 29% | 0% | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 5 | | The Villages FC | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 19 |
| 1.90 | 30% | 40% | 30% | 60% | 40% | 2.10 | ||
| 6 | | New York Red Bulls III | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 18 |
| 2.00 | 22% | 78% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 4.67 | ||
| 7 | | Cincinnati Dutch Lions FC | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 5 | +14 | 17 |
| 2.43 | 57% | 43% | 0% | 86% | 43% | 3.43 | ||
| 8 | | Lansing United | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 17 |
| 2.13 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 50% | 38% | 2.38 | ||
| 9 | | 雷丁狂怒 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 3 | +10 | 17 | 2.43 | 71% | 29% | 14% | 86% | 14% | 2.29 | |||
| 10 | | FC Golden State Force | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | +10 | 16 |
| 2.29 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 71% | 71% | 2.86 | ||
| 11 | | Brazos Valley FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 8 | +9 | 16 |
| 2.00 | 38% | 50% | 25% | 75% | 63% | 3.13 | ||
| 12 | | SIMA Aguilas | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 16 |
| 2.29 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 57% | 43% | 2.14 | ||
| 13 | | Chicago FC United | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 16 |
| 1.60 | 40% | 40% | 30% | 70% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 14 | | 长岛骑马者 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 15 |
| 2.14 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 15 | | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 14 |
| 2.33 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 83% | 67% | 2.83 | ||
| 16 | | GPS Portland Phoenix | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 8 | +6 | 14 |
| 2.00 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 17 | | Oklahoma City Energy FC II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 13 | +9 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 18 | | Lakeland Tropics SC | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 86% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 19 | | 弗雷斯诺福尔戈 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | +1 | 13 |
| 1.86 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 20 | | 密歇根公鹿 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 29 | 9 | +20 | 12 |
| 2.00 | 17% | 83% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 6.33 | ||
| 21 | | 塔科马潮水 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | +3 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 100% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 22 | | Orange County SC II | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 57% | 2.57 | ||
| 23 | | FC Boston Bolts | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 24 | | 圣路易斯雄狮 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 25 | | 大洋城男爵 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.71 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 26 | | FC Tucson | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 12 |
| 1.33 | 0% | 78% | 22% | 89% | 78% | 3.67 | ||
| 27 | | Colorado Rapids II | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 16 | +6 | 11 |
| 1.38 | 13% | 75% | 13% | 88% | 75% | 4.75 | ||
| 28 | | 卡里铁路之鹰U23 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 11 |
| 1.57 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 71% | 2.86 | ||
| 29 | | Myrtle Beach Mutiny | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 17 | +1 | 11 |
| 1.38 | 13% | 75% | 13% | 100% | 75% | 4.38 | ||
| 30 | | Lane United FC | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 31 | | 雷湾寒颤 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 9 | +3 | 10 | 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 14% | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |||
| 32 | | South Carolina United Bantams | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 33 | | 西部先锋 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 34 | | AC Connecticut Soccer | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 10 |
| 1.43 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | ||
| 35 | | 密西西比布里拉 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 36 | | Texas United FC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 71% | 4.43 | ||
| 37 | | 文图拉县溶合 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 71% | 43% | 2.57 | ||
| 38 | | FC Miami City Champions | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 9 |
| 1.29 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 100% | 100% | 4.86 | ||
| 39 | | Kaw Valley FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 29% | 2.57 | ||
| 40 | | San Francisco Glens SC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 41 | | TSS FC Rovers | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 86% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 42 | | 西弗吉尼亚混乱 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | ||
| 43 | | Ogden City SC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | ||
| 44 | | Albuquerque Sol FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 71% | 3.43 | ||
| 45 | | 布拉登顿学院 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 86% | 86% | 3.29 | ||
| 46 | | North County United FC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 8 |
| 1.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 86% | 4.29 | ||
| 47 | | Colorado Pride Switchbacks FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 48 | | Corpus Christi FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 4.57 | ||
| 49 | | Santa Cruz Breakers FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | ||
| 50 | | San Diego Zest FC | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 100% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 51 | | San Francisco City FC | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 7 |
| 1.00 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 86% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 52 | | Lionsbridge FC | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 53 | | 韦斯特切斯特火焰 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 1.00 | 0% | 83% | 17% | 100% | 83% | 3.83 | ||
| 54 | | 维克托里亚高原人 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 2.71 | ||
| 55 | | 南加州海马 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 56 | | Birmingham Hammers FC | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 86% | 0% | 86% | 86% | 3.86 | ||
| 57 | | Peachtree City MOBA FC | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 6 |
| 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 100% | 71% | 4.00 | ||
| 58 | | Tri Cities FC | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 5 |
| 0.71 | 14% | 71% | 14% | 86% | 71% | 4.86 | ||
| 59 | | Tobacco Road FC | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 5 |
| 0.71 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 60 | | Houston FC | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 86% | 86% | 3.43 | ||
| 61 | | Weston FC | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 83% | 83% | 3.50 | ||
| 62 | | 夏洛特雄鹰 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -12 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 63 | | Portland Timbers III | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 4 |
| 0.57 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 64 | | Next Academy Palm Beach FC | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 71% | 71% | 2.57 | ||
| 65 | | FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 66 | | Albion Hurricanes FC Royals | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 71% | 4.29 | ||
| 67 | | 卡罗莱纳戴拿模 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 86% | 57% | 4.00 | ||
| 68 | | FA Euro New York Magic | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 69 | | FC Cleburne | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 3 |
| 0.43 | 14% | 57% | 29% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 70 | | 新汉普顿郡幻影 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | ||
| 71 | | Memphis FC | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 20 | -15 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 57% | 3.57 | ||
| 72 | | Derby City Rovers | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 19 | -16 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 73 | | Evergreen FC | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 1 |
| 0.14 | 0% | 86% | 14% | 100% | 86% | 5.00 | ||
| 74 | | World Soccer Academy Winnipeg | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 24 | -20 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
- 得梅因威胁
经常在客场比赛中获胜。得梅因威胁的客场比赛获胜百分比为 100% - Black Rock FC
在客场比赛中表现出色。在客场比赛获胜方面排名前列。 Black Rock FC的统计数据记录为88%。 - Calgary Foothills Soccer Club
在客场比赛中表现出色。在客场比赛获胜方面排名前列。 Calgary Foothills Soccer Club的统计数据记录为88%。 - Evergreen FC
在客场表现不佳。他们是排名最差的3 之一，排名为0%的客场比赛获胜。 - World Soccer Academy Winnipeg
在客场表现不佳。他们是排名最差的3 之一，排名为0%的客场比赛获胜。 - Derby City Rovers
拥有0%的所有团队中客场比赛获胜百分比最低。
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛(美国)客场积分表由74支球队组成，每支球队都参加过7场的客场比赛。
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛中的客场获胜百分比为38%
- 美国足球冠军乙级联赛中的客队平均每场比赛得分 1.65，而他们在客场的每场比赛失球1.81分。
- 客场球队平均11.75次射门，同时每场比赛得到0越位的罚球。
主场& 客场积分表 - 美国
- 组别 1
- 组别 2
- 组别 4
- 组别 1
- 组别 4
- 组别 3
- 赛杯
- 组别 4
- 组别 2
- 组别 3
- 组别 1
- 赛杯
- 组别 2
- 组别 4
- 组别 3
- 赛杯