Loading
3 - 2
Goal Timings were not recorded for this match
* Post-Match data such as shots, cards, and corners are not yet available yet for this match. Will be added soon.
Three Bridges vs Whitehawk's head to head record shows that in the previous 3 meetings, Three Bridges has won 2 times, Whitehawk has won 1 times, and 0 ended in a draw. Three Bridges scored 3 goals and Whitehawk scored 4 goals in these matches.
Three Bridges v Whitehawk Past H2H Results & Fixtures
*Three Bridges FC and Whitehawk FC's average prediction data across current season
- W
- L
- W
- W
- L
- L
- W
- W
- W
- W
- L
- L
- L
- L
- L
- W
- L
- W
- L
- L
- W
- W
- W
- W
- L
- D
- D
- L
- W
- L
Whitehawk is +9% better in terms of Goals Scored
Three Bridges at Home
Whitehawk at Away
| Scored Per Game | Three Bridges | Whitehawk |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 73% | 81% |
| Over 1.5 | 53% | 50% |
| Over 2.5 | 27% | 19% |
| Over 3.5 | 7% | 13% |
| Failed To Score | 27% | 19% |
| Scored 1st/2nd Half | Three Bridges | Whitehawk |
|---|---|---|
| Scored in 1H | 100% | 0% |
| Scored in 2H | 100% | 33% |
| Scored in Both Halves | 0% | 0% |
| Scored Average 1H | 0 | 0 |
| Scored Average 2H | 0 | 0.33 |
* Stats include both home and away games that Three Bridges FC and Whitehawk FC have played.
Whitehawk is +55% better in terms of Goals Conceded
Three Bridges at Home
Whitehawk at Away
| Conceded / Game | Three Bridges | Whitehawk |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 87% | 50% |
| Over 1.5 | 53% | 25% |
| Over 2.5 | 33% | 6% |
| Over 3.5 | 7% | 0% |
| Clean Sheets | 13% | 50% |
| Conceded 1st/2nd Half | Three Bridges | Whitehawk |
|---|---|---|
| 1H Clean Sheet | 0% | 67% |
| 2H Clean Sheet | 0% | 100% |
| Conceded Average 1H | 0 | 0.67 |
| Conceded Average 2H | 0 | 0 |
* Goals conceded data include both home and away games that Three Bridges FC and Whitehawk FC have played.
UNLOCKCorners / Match
* Average Corner Kicks per match between Three Bridges and Whitehawk
| Match Corners | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 6 | |||
| Over 7 | |||
| Over 8 | |||
| Over 9 | |||
| Over 10 | |||
| Over 11 | |||
| Over 12 | |||
| Over 13 |
| First Half | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH Average | |||
| FH Over 4 | |||
| FH Over 5 | |||
| FH Over 6 |
| Second Half | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2H Average | |||
| 2H Over 4 | |||
| 2H Over 5 | |||
| 2H Over 6 |
Total Match Corners for Three Bridges FC and Whitehawk FC. League AVG is England Isthmian League South East Division's average across 165 matches in the 2022/2023 season.
England Isthmian League South East Division Corner Stats
73%
50%
13%
High Chance
81%
* Sum of bookings per match between Three Bridges and Whitehawk
| Match Cards | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | |||
| Over 3.5 | |||
| Over 4.5 | |||
| Over 5.5 | |||
| Over 6.5 |
| Team Cards | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cards For Average | |||
| Over 0.5 For | |||
| Over 1.5 For | |||
| Over 2.5 For | |||
| Over 3.5 For |
| Cards Against | Three Bridges | Whitehawk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 Against | |||
| Over 1.5 Against | |||
| Over 2.5 Against | |||
| Over 3.5 Against |
Total Match Cards for Three Bridges FC and Whitehawk FC. League AVG is England Isthmian League South East Division's average. There were 0 cards in 165 matches in the 2022/2023 season.
England Isthmian League South East Division Card StatsThree Bridges13%
Scored first in 2 / 15 matches
Whitehawk25%
Scored first in 4 / 16 matches
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Ramsgate |
17 | 65% | 33 | 19 | 14 | 36 | 3.06 |
2 |
Chatham Town |
16 | 63% | 30 | 17 | 13 | 33 | 2.94 |
3 |
Beckenham Town |
16 | 63% | 27 | 21 | 6 | 32 | 3.00 |
4 |
Whitehawk |
16 | 50% | 28 | 13 | 15 | 29 | 2.56 |
5 |
Cray Valley PM |
16 | 50% | 31 | 18 | 13 | 29 | 3.06 |
6 |
Ashford United |
18 | 44% | 30 | 19 | 11 | 29 | 2.72 |
7 |
VCD Athletic |
19 | 42% | 27 | 30 | -3 | 27 | 3.00 |
8 |
Littlehampton Town |
16 | 44% | 20 | 16 | 4 | 25 | 2.25 |
9 |
Chichester City |
17 | 35% | 19 | 17 | 2 | 25 | 2.12 |
10 |
Sevenoaks Town FC |
16 | 44% | 19 | 16 | 3 | 24 | 2.19 |
11 |
Burgess Hill Town |
16 | 38% | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 | 2.13 |
12 |
Sheppey United |
17 | 35% | 21 | 25 | -4 | 21 | 2.71 |
13 |
Hythe Town |
15 | 33% | 15 | 16 | -1 | 20 | 2.07 |
14 |
East Grinstead Town |
16 | 38% | 20 | 23 | -3 | 20 | 2.69 |
15 |
Lancing |
18 | 28% | 22 | 31 | -9 | 19 | 2.94 |
16 |
Haywards Heath Town |
17 | 29% | 25 | 35 | -10 | 19 | 3.53 |
17 |
Three Bridges |
15 | 40% | 24 | 27 | -3 | 18 | 3.40 |
18 |
Sittingbourne |
16 | 25% | 15 | 18 | -3 | 16 | 2.06 |
19 |
Corinthian |
16 | 13% | 10 | 27 | -17 | 9 | 2.31 |
20 |
Faversham Town |
17 | 12% | 17 | 45 | -28 | 8 | 3.65 |
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Ramsgate |
17 | 65% | 33 | 19 | 14 | 36 | 3.06 |
2 |
Chatham Town |
16 | 63% | 30 | 17 | 13 | 33 | 2.94 |
3 |
Beckenham Town |
16 | 63% | 27 | 21 | 6 | 32 | 3.00 |
4 |
Whitehawk |
16 | 50% | 28 | 13 | 15 | 29 | 2.56 |
5 |
Cray Valley PM |
16 | 50% | 31 | 18 | 13 | 29 | 3.06 |
6 |
Ashford United |
18 | 44% | 30 | 19 | 11 | 29 | 2.72 |
7 |
VCD Athletic |
19 | 42% | 27 | 30 | -3 | 27 | 3.00 |
8 |
Littlehampton Town |
16 | 44% | 20 | 16 | 4 | 25 | 2.25 |
9 |
Chichester City |
17 | 35% | 19 | 17 | 2 | 25 | 2.12 |
10 |
Sevenoaks Town FC |
16 | 44% | 19 | 16 | 3 | 24 | 2.19 |
11 |
Burgess Hill Town |
16 | 38% | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 | 2.13 |
12 |
Sheppey United |
17 | 35% | 21 | 25 | -4 | 21 | 2.71 |
13 |
Hythe Town |
15 | 33% | 15 | 16 | -1 | 20 | 2.07 |
14 |
East Grinstead Town |
16 | 38% | 20 | 23 | -3 | 20 | 2.69 |
15 |
Lancing |
18 | 28% | 22 | 31 | -9 | 19 | 2.94 |
16 |
Haywards Heath Town |
17 | 29% | 25 | 35 | -10 | 19 | 3.53 |
17 |
Three Bridges |
15 | 40% | 24 | 27 | -3 | 18 | 3.40 |
18 |
Sittingbourne |
16 | 25% | 15 | 18 | -3 | 16 | 2.06 |
19 |
Corinthian |
16 | 13% | 10 | 27 | -17 | 9 | 2.31 |
20 |
Faversham Town |
17 | 12% | 17 | 45 | -28 | 8 | 3.65 |
* England Isthmian League South East Division Form Table is also available