Loading
Beijing Institute of Technology FC vs Zibo Cuju FCStats, H2H & xG
BIT vs Zibo Cuju's head to head record shows that in the previous 3 meetings, BIT has won 0 times, Zibo Cuju has won 3 times, and 0 ended in a draw. BIT scored 0 goals and Zibo Cuju scored 6 goals in these matches.
BIT v Zibo Cuju Past H2H Results & Fixtures
*Beijing Institute of Technology FC and Zibo Cuju FC's average prediction data across current season
- L
- L
- D
- L
- D
- L
- L
- L
- D
- D
- L
- L
- L
- L
- L
- L
- W
- L
- W
- L
- D
- D
- L
- W
- W
- L
- D
- L
- L
- L
Zibo Cuju is +103% better in terms of Goals Scored
BIT at Home
Zibo Cuju at Away
* Stats from Beijing Institute of Technology FC's home scoring record and Zibo Cuju FC's data at away fixtures.
Both Teams are equal in terms of Goals Conceded
BIT at Home
Zibo Cuju at Away
* Stats from Beijing Institute of Technology FC's home conceding record and Zibo Cuju FC's away fixtures.
UNLOCKCorners / Match
* Average Corner Kicks per match between BIT and Zibo Cuju
Total Match Corners for Beijing Institute of Technology FC and Zibo Cuju FC. League AVG is China China League One's average across 111 matches in the 2022 season.
China China League One Corner Stats
17%
17%
17%
50%
* Sum of bookings per match between BIT and Zibo Cuju
Total Match Cards for Beijing Institute of Technology FC and Zibo Cuju FC. League AVG is China China League One's average. There were 269 cards in 111 matches in the 2022 season.
China China League One Card StatsBIT8%
Scored first in 1 / 12 matches
Zibo Cuju33%
Scored first in 4 / 12 matches
Goals By Minute
BIT and Zibo Cuju's goals by 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
| 10 Mins | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 0% | 15% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 9% | 3% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 9% | 6% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 6% | 12% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 20% | 9% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 3% | 12% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 11% | 18% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 14% | 0% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 11% | 18% |
| 15 Mins | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 9% | 15% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 9% | 9% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 14% | 18% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 14% | 15% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 17% | 18% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 20% | 18% |
| Scored (10 min) | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 0% | 8% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 17% | 8% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 0% | 15% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 0% | 15% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 17% | 15% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 0% | 8% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 33% | 8% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 17% | 0% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 17% | 23% |
| Scored (15 min) | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 17% | 8% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 0% | 23% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 0% | 31% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 17% | 8% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 50% | 8% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 17% | 23% |
| Conceded (10 min) | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 10 Mins | 0% | 19% |
| 11 - 20 Mins | 7% | 0% |
| 21 - 30 Mins | 10% | 0% |
| 31 - 40 Mins | 7% | 10% |
| 41 - 50 Mins | 21% | 5% |
| 51 - 60 Mins | 3% | 14% |
| 61 - 70 Mins | 7% | 24% |
| 71 - 80 Mins | 14% | 0% |
| 81 - 90 Mins | 10% | 14% |
| Conceded (15 min) | BIT | Zibo Cuju |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 15 Mins | 7% | 19% |
| 16 - 30 Mins | 10% | 0% |
| 31 - 45 Mins | 17% | 10% |
| 46 - 60 Mins | 14% | 19% |
| 61 - 75 Mins | 10% | 24% |
| 76 - 90 Mins | 21% | 14% |
45' and 90' includes injury time goals.
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
7 | 71% | 12 | 4 | 8 | 17 | 2.29 |
2 |
Kunshan |
6 | 83% | 13 | 3 | 10 | 16 | 2.67 |
3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
7 | 57% | 13 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 3.00 |
4 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
7 | 57% | 9 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 2.00 |
5 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
6 | 67% | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 2.67 |
6 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 57% | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 2.86 |
7 |
Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 60% | 6 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 1.40 |
8 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
6 | 50% | 11 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 2.83 |
9 |
Zibo Cuju |
6 | 50% | 9 | 7 | 2 | 11 | 2.67 |
10 |
Beijing BG |
7 | 43% | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 3.00 |
11 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
7 | 29% | 8 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 2.14 |
12 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
6 | 50% | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | 2.83 |
13 |
Shanghai Jiading |
5 | 60% | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 2.40 |
14 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
7 | 43% | 10 | 11 | -1 | 9 | 3.00 |
15 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
6 | 17% | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1.67 |
16 |
Nanjing City |
5 | 20% | 5 | 6 | -1 | 5 | 2.20 |
17 |
Shenyang Urban |
5 | 20% | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 | 2.80 |
18 |
BIT |
6 | 0% | 2 | 14 | -12 | 2 | 2.67 |
| Team | MP | Win | GF | GA | GD | Pts | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
7 | 86% | 16 | 5 | 11 | 18 | 3.00 |
2 |
Kunshan |
6 | 67% | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 2.83 |
3 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 80% | 15 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 3.80 |
4 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
5 | 60% | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 2.60 |
5 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
7 | 43% | 7 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 1.71 |
6 |
Hebei Kungfu |
7 | 43% | 8 | 9 | -1 | 11 | 2.43 |
7 |
Nanjing City |
8 | 38% | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 | 2.50 |
8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 40% | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3.00 |
9 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
5 | 20% | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2.40 |
10 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
6 | 17% | 8 | 11 | -3 | 5 | 3.17 |
11 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
7 | 0% | 2 | 7 | -5 | 4 | 1.29 |
12 |
Beijing BG |
5 | 20% | 2 | 8 | -6 | 4 | 2.00 |
13 |
Shenyang Urban |
7 | 14% | 4 | 14 | -10 | 4 | 2.57 |
14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 0% | 1 | 5 | -4 | 2 | 1.20 |
15 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
6 | 0% | 3 | 11 | -8 | 1 | 2.33 |
16 |
Zibo Cuju |
6 | 0% | 4 | 14 | -10 | 1 | 3.00 |
17 |
Shanghai Jiading |
8 | 0% | 5 | 16 | -11 | 1 | 2.63 |
18 |
BIT |
6 | 0% | 4 | 15 | -11 | 0 | 3.17 |
* China China League One Home Table and Away Tables are also available
Top Scorers - BIT
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One
Top Scorers - Zibo Cuju
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One
Cards Given - BIT
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One
Cards Given - Zibo Cuju
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One
Cards / 90 - BIT
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One
Cards / 90 - Zibo Cuju
* Stats from 2022 season of China League One